Abdominoperineal Extra-Elevators Rectal Resection for Cancer: Prone Position vs. Supine Position (APPRO)
Estudio A.P.PRO: Estrategia quirúrgica en la amputación Abdominoperineal cilíndrica Del Recto Por cáncer: posición de litotomía vs. Prono-navaja
Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the prone vs. the supine position of the perineal time of the Miles operation in patients with advanced rectal cancer.
Primary objective:
- Pathological circumferential resection margin
Secondary objectives:
- 5 year oncological outcomes
- Morbimortality rates
- Surgical specimen quality
- Perineal hernia incidence
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Murcia, Spain
- Hospital Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca"
-
Valencia, Spain, 46026
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
-
Valencia, Spain
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
-
Valencia, Spain
- Hospital Clinico Universitario
-
-
Andalucia
-
Jerez, Andalucia, Spain
- Hospital del SAS
-
-
Andalucía
-
Cordoba, Andalucía, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
-
-
Castilla Y Leon
-
Medina del Campo, Castilla Y Leon, Spain
- Hospital General
-
-
Cataluña
-
Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
- Hospital Bellvitge
-
Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
- Hospital Del Mar
-
Girona, Cataluña, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta
-
Sabadell, Cataluña, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí
-
-
Galicia
-
Orense, Galicia, Spain
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario
-
Vigo, Galicia, Spain
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario
-
-
Navarra
-
Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
- Complejo Hospitalario
-
-
Pais Vasco
-
Donostia, Pais Vasco, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Donostia
-
-
Valencia
-
Elche, Valencia, Spain
- Hospital General Universitario
-
Requena, Valencia, Spain
- Hospital General
-
Sagunto, Valencia, Spain
- Hospital de Sagunto
-
Xativa, Valencia, Spain
- Hospital Luis Alcanyis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with primary low lying rectal cancer involving or threatening anal sphincter complex as seen in MRI
Exclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification of Physical Health (ASA) IV patients
- Locally palliative purpose of the operation
- Age < 18 years
- Preoperative indication for pelvic exenteration
- Pregnancy
- Lack of patients consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Supine position
Abdominoperineal resection - perineal time- in supine position
|
Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer involving anal sphincter complex
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Prone position
Abdominoperineal resection - perineal time- in prone position
|
Abdominoperineal extra-elevators rectal resection for low lying rectal cancer involving anal sphincter complex
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of the circumferential resection margin
Time Frame: 15-30 days after surgery date
|
Histopathological report of the circumferential resection margin of the surgical specimen obtained in patients that underwent perineal time of Miles procedure in prone vs supine position.
|
15-30 days after surgery date
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Histopathological quality of surgical specimen
Time Frame: 15-30 days after
|
Comparison of the quality of the surgical specimen in terms of integrity of the circumferential resection margin, accidental iatrogenic rupture etc.
|
15-30 days after
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oncological outcomes
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Compare the incidence of local oncological disease, distance metastasis and survival in a 5 year follow up time span.
|
5 years
|
|
Morbidity of the perineal incision.
Time Frame: 1 day, 60 days ,1 ,2,3,4 and 5 years after surgery
|
Evaluation the clinical outcome of the perineal wound in terms of infection, dehiscence, perineal hernia etc.
|
1 day, 60 days ,1 ,2,3,4 and 5 years after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Matteo Frasson, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
- Study Chair: Eduardo Garcia-Granero, MD, PhD, EBSQ-c, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Garcia-Granero E, Faiz O, Munoz E, Flor B, Navarro S, Faus C, Garcia-Botello SA, Lledo S, Cervantes A. Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team. Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;115(15):3400-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24387.
- Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg. 1998 Aug;133(8):894-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894.
- Flor-Lorente B, Frasson M, Montilla E. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position. Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92 Suppl 1:30-9. doi: 10.1016/S0009-739X(14)70006-5. English, Spanish.
- Frasson M, Garcia-Granero E. Reply to Kelly et al. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;18(3):312-3. doi: 10.1111/codi.13272. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- APPRO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.