Trial of IV NTG for CD After Second Stage Arrest for the Prevention of Uterine Extension (NITRO)

May 6, 2020 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Randomized Controlled Trial of IV Nitroglycerin in Cesarean Deliveries After Second Stage Arrest for the Prevention of Uterine Extension

Randomized controlled clinical trial of IV nitroglycerin at cesarean delivery for second stage arrest of descent to prevent or uterine extension at the hysterectomy site.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Intravenous nitroglycerin resulting in uterine relaxation has been standardly utilized for various obstetrics conditions, e.g. breech extraction of second twin in vaginal deliveries, uterine relaxation after tachysystole in labor, prior to external cephalic version, and during difficult fetal extraction during cesarean delivery for arrest of descent in labor. Currently the use of nitroglycerin is at equipoise in obstetrics for difficult cesarean delivery after second stage arrest in labor. The clinical trial will randomize women who undergo cesarean delivery for second stage arrest in labor to receive IV nitroglycerin vs saline at the time of hysterotomy. The primary outcomes will be maternal: uterine extension, blood loss, total fetal extraction time, surgical time; neonatal: cord gases at delivery, apgar scores, admission to neonatal intensive care unit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University California San Francisco-Labor and Delivery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria: women 37weeks or greater gestation diagnosed with second stage arrest of descent undergoing cesarean delivery -

Exclusion Criteria: elective, active phase arrest cesarean delivery, successful operative vaginal delivery

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intravenous Nitroglycerin
Subjects will receive IV nitroglycerin at the time of Hysterotomy. Infusion will be stopped once neonate is delivered
Drug: intravenous nitroglycerin
Infusion at started at time of hysterotomy and stopped at neonate delivery
No Intervention: Intravenous Saline
Subjects will receive IV saline at the time of Hysterotomy. Infusion will be stopped once neonate is delivered

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Uterine Extension of Hysterotomy
Time Frame: During cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Obstetrician determined whether the subject had an uterine extension.
During cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Umbilical Artery Blood pH
Time Frame: At time of cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Measure of umbilical artery blood pH
At time of cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Number of Participants With Deliveries After Which Neonate is Admitted to NICU
Time Frame: After cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
After cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Number of Participants With Deliveries in Which Cord Blood Base Deficit is More Negative Than or Equal to Negative 12
Time Frame: At time of cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
A cord blood base deficit more negative than negative 12 is abnormal and a sign of metabolic acidosis.
At time of cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
APGAR at 5 Minutes
Time Frame: Immediately after cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
The APGAR scale is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five simple criteria -- Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration -- on a scale from zero to two, then summing up the five values thus obtained. The resulting APGAR score ranges from zero to 10. Zero is the worst possible score and 10 is the highest possible score.
Immediately after cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fetal Extraction Time in Seconds
Time Frame: At time of cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Time from uterine incision to delivery (body of neonate fully extracted from uterus)
At time of cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Total Operative Time in Minutes
Time Frame: After cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Time from uterine incision to out of room
After cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Surgical Blood Loss
Time Frame: During and after cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest
Total blood loss will be measured
During and after cesarean delivery, estimated to be within 4 hours after diagnosis of second stage arrest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Francisco

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer M Lucero, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UCSF-OB-NTG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings