Autologous Cell Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery

October 28, 2021 updated by: Cook MyoSite

Muscle Cell Mediated Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery: An Investigation of Cook MyoSite Autologous Muscle Derived Cells

To study the safety and potential efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Urinary Sphincter Repair (AMDC-USR) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for patients that have undergone prior prostate surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This preliminary, prospective, single-arm clinical study will evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Urinary Sphincter Repair (AMDC-USR) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that develops following prostate surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami School of Medicine
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • William Beaumont Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • McKay Urology
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male, at least 18 years old, with primary symptoms of SUI following prostate surgery,
  • Patient has undergone prostate surgery but has not undergone radiation therapy, cryotherapy, or high-intensity focused ultrasound of the prostate,
  • SUI severity should be ≥10 g and <400 g of urine leakage over 24 hours,
  • Patient has failed to achieve acceptable resolution of SUI symptoms following prior therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of only urge urinary incontinence,
  • Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence prior to prostate surgery,
  • Routinely has more than 2 episodes of awakening to void during normal sleeping hours,
  • Compromised immune system due to disease state, chronic corticosteroid use, or other immunosuppressive therapy,
  • Previously treated with a periurethral balloon or adjustable sling for urinary incontinence,
  • Symptoms of overflow incontinence
  • Additional medical restrictions as specified in the Clinical Investigation Plan,
  • Additional anatomical restrictions as specified in the Clinical Investigation Plan.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AMDC-USR
Cell treatment
Biological: autologous muscle-derived cells (AMDC)
Cell treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Product-related, Biopsy Procedure-related, and Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety of AMDC-USR following treatment of SUI in male patients who have undergone prior prostate surgery was determined by the frequency and severity of adverse events related to study procedures and study product through 24 months following treatment of SUI in male patients who have undergone prior prostate surgery.
24 months
Volume of Post-void Residual (PVR) Urine
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Post void residual volume (PVR) was assessed through 12 months post-treatment to monitor potential retention or obstruction.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Amount of Urine Leakage (Median 24 Hour Pad Weight)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in the amount of urine leakage from baseline was assessed by 24-hour pad test at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Amount of urine leakage experienced by subject at home during a 24-hour period; all pads used during test period are weighed before and after use and differences in weights represent the amount of urine leaked.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Amount of Urine Leakage (Categorial ≥50% Reduction in 24-hour Pad Weight)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in the amount of urine leakage from baseline was assessed by a 24-hour pad test at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Amount of urine leakage experienced by subject at home during a 24-hour period; all pads used during test period are weighed before and after use and differences in weights represent the amount of urine leaked.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) - Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median change from baseline in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) was assessed by the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The I-QOL questionnaire was a validated, 22-item tool used to assess QOL of participants with urinary incontinence. Scored 0 to100, with higher scores indicating a better QOL.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Symptom Severity- International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median change from baseline in patient-reported symptom severity was assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The ICIQ questionnaire was a validated 4-item tool used to assess symptom severity of participants with urinary incontinence. Scored 0 to 21, with lower scores indicating a better symptom severity.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change in Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity - International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) questionnaire. The I-PSS was a validated questionnaire used to assess the severity of three urine storage symptoms (frequency, nocturia, urgency), four voiding symptoms (feeling of incomplete emptying, intermittency, straining, and a weak stream) and the degree of bother associated with those symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms, and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Distribution of Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity Scores - Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) questionnaire. The PGI-S was a global assessment of symptom severity compared with severity before treatment started. Ratings that could be selected were: 1-normal, 2-mild, 3-moderate, and 4-severe. Percentages of participants in each category were determined at each visit.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Distribution of Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity Scores - Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. The PGI-I was a global assessment of symptom severity in which participants selected the following ratings: 1-Very much better, 2-Much better, 3-A little better, 4-No change, 5-A little worse, 6-Much worse, and 7-Very much worse. Percentages of participants in each category were determined at each visit.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Erectile Dysfunction (ED) - Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
SUI and ED can be comorbidities that develop following prostate surgery; median change from baseline in patient-reported Erectile Dysfunction (ED) was assessed by the 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). The IIEF-5 questionnaire was a validated 5-item tool used to assess to presence and severity of erectile dysfunction. Scored from 5 to 25, with lower scores indicating less ED symptoms.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cook MyoSite

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 19, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13-11

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings