Autologous Cell Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery

October 28, 2021 updated by: Cook MyoSite

Muscle Cell Mediated Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery: An Investigation of Cook MyoSite Autologous Muscle Derived Cells

To study the safety and potential efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Urinary Sphincter Repair (AMDC-USR) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for patients that have undergone prior prostate surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This preliminary, prospective, single-arm clinical study will evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Urinary Sphincter Repair (AMDC-USR) for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that develops following prostate surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami School of Medicine
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • William Beaumont Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • McKay Urology
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male, at least 18 years old, with primary symptoms of SUI following prostate surgery,
  • Patient has undergone prostate surgery but has not undergone radiation therapy, cryotherapy, or high-intensity focused ultrasound of the prostate,
  • SUI severity should be ≥10 g and <400 g of urine leakage over 24 hours,
  • Patient has failed to achieve acceptable resolution of SUI symptoms following prior therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of only urge urinary incontinence,
  • Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence prior to prostate surgery,
  • Routinely has more than 2 episodes of awakening to void during normal sleeping hours,
  • Compromised immune system due to disease state, chronic corticosteroid use, or other immunosuppressive therapy,
  • Previously treated with a periurethral balloon or adjustable sling for urinary incontinence,
  • Symptoms of overflow incontinence
  • Additional medical restrictions as specified in the Clinical Investigation Plan,
  • Additional anatomical restrictions as specified in the Clinical Investigation Plan.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AMDC-USR
Cell treatment
Cell treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Product-related, Biopsy Procedure-related, and Injection Procedure-related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety of AMDC-USR following treatment of SUI in male patients who have undergone prior prostate surgery was determined by the frequency and severity of adverse events related to study procedures and study product through 24 months following treatment of SUI in male patients who have undergone prior prostate surgery.
24 months
Volume of Post-void Residual (PVR) Urine
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Post void residual volume (PVR) was assessed through 12 months post-treatment to monitor potential retention or obstruction.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Amount of Urine Leakage (Median 24 Hour Pad Weight)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in the amount of urine leakage from baseline was assessed by 24-hour pad test at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Amount of urine leakage experienced by subject at home during a 24-hour period; all pads used during test period are weighed before and after use and differences in weights represent the amount of urine leaked.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Amount of Urine Leakage (Categorial ≥50% Reduction in 24-hour Pad Weight)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in the amount of urine leakage from baseline was assessed by a 24-hour pad test at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Amount of urine leakage experienced by subject at home during a 24-hour period; all pads used during test period are weighed before and after use and differences in weights represent the amount of urine leaked.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) - Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median change from baseline in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) was assessed by the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The I-QOL questionnaire was a validated, 22-item tool used to assess QOL of participants with urinary incontinence. Scored 0 to100, with higher scores indicating a better QOL.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Symptom Severity- International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median change from baseline in patient-reported symptom severity was assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The ICIQ questionnaire was a validated 4-item tool used to assess symptom severity of participants with urinary incontinence. Scored 0 to 21, with lower scores indicating a better symptom severity.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change in Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity - International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) questionnaire. The I-PSS was a validated questionnaire used to assess the severity of three urine storage symptoms (frequency, nocturia, urgency), four voiding symptoms (feeling of incomplete emptying, intermittency, straining, and a weak stream) and the degree of bother associated with those symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms, and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Distribution of Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity Scores - Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) questionnaire. The PGI-S was a global assessment of symptom severity compared with severity before treatment started. Ratings that could be selected were: 1-normal, 2-mild, 3-moderate, and 4-severe. Percentages of participants in each category were determined at each visit.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Distribution of Patient-reported Incontinence Symptom Severity Scores - Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Patient-reported incontinence symptom severity was assessed by questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. The PGI-I was a global assessment of symptom severity in which participants selected the following ratings: 1-Very much better, 2-Much better, 3-A little better, 4-No change, 5-A little worse, 6-Much worse, and 7-Very much worse. Percentages of participants in each category were determined at each visit.
1, 3, 6, and 12 months
Median Change From Baseline in Patient-reported Erectile Dysfunction (ED) - Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months
SUI and ED can be comorbidities that develop following prostate surgery; median change from baseline in patient-reported Erectile Dysfunction (ED) was assessed by the 5-Item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). The IIEF-5 questionnaire was a validated 5-item tool used to assess to presence and severity of erectile dysfunction. Scored from 5 to 25, with lower scores indicating less ED symptoms.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urologic Diseases

Clinical Trials on autologous muscle-derived cells (AMDC)

Subscribe