Endpoint Calibration for a Phase 2 Study of Lisinopril in Multiple Sclerosis

October 10, 2017 updated by: Transparency Life Sciences

Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Proof-of-Concept Efficacy of Lisinopril in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), Stage 1

This study aims to calibrate the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) for home implementation in a phase 2 trial of lisinopril in multiple sclerosis. In this initial stage, participants are required to travel to the study site one day a week for three weeks to complete the MSFC. They are also required to complete the MSFC at home once weekly for three weeks using remote sensing technology and video conferencing.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Recruiting
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fred Lublin, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females between the ages of 18 and 64.
  2. Documented informed consent
  3. Documented diagnosis of RRMS via 2010 McDonald Criteria
  4. Normal blood pressure at baseline: 90-140 mmHg systolic AND 60-90 mmHg diastolic
  5. Baseline score of 0-5.5 on Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
  6. Availability of a person in the home who is physically able and willing to steady the subject if s/he loses balance during the walk test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypotensive at baseline: <90 mmHg systolic or <60 mmHg diastolic
  2. Hypertensive at baseline: >140 mmHg systolic or >90 mmHg diastolic
  3. Bradycardia at baseline: < 50 bpm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group 1
Participants will be separated into two groups for scheduling purposes. Each group will complete the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) once weekly at the study site and once weekly at home for three weeks. They will alternate their visit dates with Group 2.
Procedure: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
The MSFC is a diagnostic test that measures multiple sclerosis symptoms. It includes a timed walk test, 9-hole peg test, and paced auditory serial addition test. The MSFC is administered in-person at the study site.
Other Names:
  • MSFC
Procedure: Mobile Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
The mMSFC is a diagnostic test that measures multiple sclerosis symptoms from. It includes a timed walk test, 9-hole peg test, and paced auditory serial addition test. All aspects of this exam are completed from a participant's home using remote sensing technology and video conferencing.
Other Names:
  • mMSFC
Active Comparator: Group 2
Participants will be separated into two groups for scheduling purposes. Each group will complete the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) once weekly at the study site and once weekly at home for three weeks. They will alternate their visit dates with Group 1.
Procedure: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
The MSFC is a diagnostic test that measures multiple sclerosis symptoms. It includes a timed walk test, 9-hole peg test, and paced auditory serial addition test. The MSFC is administered in-person at the study site.
Other Names:
  • MSFC
Procedure: Mobile Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
The mMSFC is a diagnostic test that measures multiple sclerosis symptoms from. It includes a timed walk test, 9-hole peg test, and paced auditory serial addition test. All aspects of this exam are completed from a participant's home using remote sensing technology and video conferencing.
Other Names:
  • mMSFC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of mMSFC Tally
Time Frame: Week 6
Safety of remote video administration of the mMSFC will be calculated at the end of the study by calculating and comparing the instances of balance-related safety issues.
Week 6
MSFC Score Comparison
Time Frame: Week 6
mMSFC scores will be compared to MSFC scores for proof of calibration.
Week 6
Mobile Timed Walk Test Value Comparison
Time Frame: Week 6
Mobile timed walk times will be compared to 25-foot timed walk test times for proof of calibration.
Week 6
Mobile 9-hole Peg Test Time Comparison
Time Frame: Week 6
Mobile 9HPT time will be compared to 9 HPT time for proof of calibration.
Week 6
Mobile Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test Score Comparison
Time Frame: Week 6
Mobile PASAT3 scores will be compared to PASAT3 scores for proof of calibration.
Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Transparency Life Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Tomasz Sablinski, MD, PhD, Transparency Life Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TLS-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings