A Study to Investigate How Common Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency (PEI) is in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Also to Investigate the Uptake of a Single Dose of EPANOVA® or OMACOR® in Patients With Different Degrees of PEI (PRECISE)

November 25, 2016 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Two-part, Open-label, Randomised, Crossover, Multicentre, Phase II Study to Investigate the Presence of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency (PEI) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of EPANOVA® and OMACOR® Following a Single Oral Dose in Patients With Different Degrees of PEI

This study is a 2-part open-label, randomized, crossover, multicenter, non-therapeutic Phase II study to investigate the presence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of EPANOVA® (omega-3 carboxylic acids) and omega-3-acid ethyl esters (OMACOR®, Abbott Healthcare Products Ltd) following a single oral dose in patients with different degrees of PEI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
490

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Frederiksberg, Denmark
        • Research Site
      • København NV, Denmark
        • Research Site
      • Århus, Denmark
        • Research Site
  • Hungary
      • Balatonfüred, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Létavértes, Hungary
        • Research Site
  • Latvia
      • Daugavpils, Latvia
        • Research Site
      • Jekabpils, Latvia
        • Research Site
      • Riga, Latvia
        • Research Site
  • Poland
      • Białystok, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Puławy, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Staszów, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Zamość, Poland
        • Research Site
  • Slovakia
      • Bardejov, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Bratislava, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Lubochna, Slovakia
        • Research Site
  • Sweden
      • Göteborg, Sweden
        • Research Site
      • Linköping, Sweden
        • Research Site
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Research Site
      • Malmo, Sweden
        • Research Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Research Site
      • Uppsala, Sweden
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged ≥18 years and ≤70 years, with suitable veins for cannulation or repeated venipuncture.
  • Clinically diagnosed Type 2 diabetics (American Diabetes Association guidelines;), on oral antibiotic drug use ≥3 months and HbA1c value ≥6.5% and ≤9.0% at Visit 1.
  • Have a body mass index ≥18 kg/m2 and ≤40 kg/m2 and weigh at least 50 kg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance to Omega-3 fatty acids, ethyl esters or fish.
  • On insulin therapy or treated with injectable Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1).
  • Treated with bile acid sequestrants.
  • Serum levels of TGs >10 mmol/L at any time during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Sequence AB
A single dose of EPANOVA® 4 g (administered as 4 x 1 g capsules) at Visit 4, followed by 10 to 14 days washout, followed by a single dose of OMACOR® 4 g (administered as 4 x 1 g capsules) at Visit 7.
Drug: Epanova® (omega-3 carboxylic acids)
4 g (administered orally as 4 x 1 g capsules)
Other Names:
  • omega-3 carboxylic acids
Drug: Omacor® (omega-3-acid ethyl esters)
4 g (administered orally as 4 x 1 g capsules)
Other Names:
  • omega-3-acid ethyl esters
EXPERIMENTAL: Sequence BA
A single dose of OMACOR® 4 g (administered as 4 x 1 g capsules) at Visit 4, followed by 10 to 14 days washout, followed by a single dose of EPANOVA® 4 g (administered as 4 x 1 g capsules) at Visit 7.
Drug: Epanova® (omega-3 carboxylic acids)
4 g (administered orally as 4 x 1 g capsules)
Other Names:
  • omega-3 carboxylic acids
Drug: Omacor® (omega-3-acid ethyl esters)
4 g (administered orally as 4 x 1 g capsules)
Other Names:
  • omega-3-acid ethyl esters

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Part A: Serum TG Level.
Time Frame: 7 days after enrollment.
For Part A, the distribution of serum TG levels by the degree of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) was assessed in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).
7 days after enrollment.
Part B: Baseline Corrected Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-last]) for Total Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) Following Administration of EPANOVA® and OMACOR®.
Time Frame: Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Baseline corrected AUC(0-last) was measured for total EPA following administration of single oral doses of EPANOVA® 4 g (A) and OMACOR® 4 g (B) (2-way crossover design) to patients with T2DM and different degrees of PEI.
Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Part B: Baseline Corrected AUC(0-last) for Total Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Following Administration of EPANOVA® and OMACOR®.
Time Frame: Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Baseline corrected AUC(0-last) was measured for total DHA following administration of single oral doses of EPANOVA® 4 g (A) and OMACOR® 4 g (B) (2-way crossover design) to patients with T2DM and different degrees of PEI.
Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Part B: Baseline Corrected AUC(0-last) for Total EPA+DHA Following Administration of EPANOVA® and OMACOR®.
Time Frame: Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Baseline corrected AUC(0-last) was measured for the sum of EPA and DHA (total EPA+DHA) following administration of single oral doses of EPANOVA® 4 g (A) and OMACOR® 4 g (B) (2-way crossover design) to patients with T2DM and different degrees of PEI.
Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Part B: Baseline Corrected Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Total EPA Following Administration of EPANOVA® and OMACOR®.
Time Frame: Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Baseline corrected Cmax was measured for total EPA following administration of single oral doses of EPANOVA® 4 g (A) and OMACOR® 4 g (B) (2-way crossover design) to patients with T2DM and different degrees of PEI.
Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Part B: Baseline Corrected Cmax for Total DHA Following Administration of EPANOVA® and OMACOR®.
Time Frame: Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Baseline corrected Cmax was measured for total DHA following administration of single oral doses of EPANOVA® 4 g (A) and OMACOR® 4 g (B) (2-way crossover design) to patients with T2DM and different degrees of PEI.
Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Part B: Baseline Corrected Cmax for Total EPA+DHA Following Administration of EPANOVA® and OMACOR®.
Time Frame: Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.
Baseline corrected Cmax was measured for the sum of EPA and DHA (total EPA+DHA) following administration of single oral doses of EPANOVA® 4 g (A) and OMACOR® 4 g (B) (2-way crossover design) to patients with T2DM and different degrees of PEI.
Blood samples for analysis were taken at 1, 0.5, and 0.05 hours pre-dose, to be used as baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24 and 48 hours post-dose.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D5881C00006
  • 2014-003511-11 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings