Immunogenicity of Rabies Vaccine for Pre Exposure Prophylaxis (RABVAX)

June 10, 2022 updated by: Timothy Endy, MD MPH, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Immunogenicity of a Two vs Three Dose, Intradermal (ID) vs Intramuscular (IM) Administration of a Licensed Rabies Vaccine for Pre-Exposure Vaccination

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a two dose versus a three dose schedule and intramuscular versus intradermal injection for pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an exploratory vaccine trial to evaluate immunogenicity of a non-licensed dosing schedule and route of administration for a currently FDA licensed rabies vaccine for pre-exposure prophylaxis against rabies infection. The goal of this study is to characterize the immune response and persistence of immunity to a shortened dose schedule and intradermal (ID) administration, relative to the current licensed dosing schedule of the rabies vaccine (3 dose (0, 7, 21 days) IM). Rabies virus is endemic throughout the world due to high rates of both wild and domestic animal rabies and the risk to deployed military in endemic areas is considerable. Currently the commonly supported pre-exposure prophylaxis regimen for rabies, in the United States is comprised of three, 1.0 ml intramuscular (IM) injections of the human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV) or purified chick embryo cell (PCEC) rabies vaccine on days 0, 7, and 21 or 28. Modified, two and three dose schedules of intradermal (ID) injections of 0.1 ml of HDCV and PCEC are utilized outside the US. These two and three dose intradermal schedules share a similar safety and immunogenicity profile to intramuscular vaccinations and are easily boosted at one year after vaccination. A death, from rabies, of a US Soldier returned from Afghanistan underscores the importance of rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis for soldiers and the need to evaluate the safest, most effective means of vaccinating large deploying forces. While the current three dose, 1 ml IM rabies series is effective, a shortened, equally effective vaccination series with significantly smaller dose per injection would greatly improve the logistics and cost associated with universal or even targeted coverage of deploying soldiers. Evaluation of a shorter, smaller-dose, pre-exposure vaccination series for rabies is the goal of this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • State University of New York, Upstate Medical University (SUNY-UMU)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Male and non-pregnant females aged ≥ 18 to ≤ 60 years on the day of inclusion Able to comprehend and give informed consent Able to attend all scheduled visits and to comply with all trial procedures Subject in good health, based on medical history and physical examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is pregnant, or lactating, or of childbearing potential (to be considered of non-childbearing potential, a female must be post- menopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of contraception or abstinence from at least 4 weeks prior to the first vaccination and until at least 4 weeks after the last vaccination).
  2. Participation in the 4 weeks preceding the first trial vaccination, or planned participation during the present trial period, in another clinical trial investigating a vaccine, drug, medical device, or medical procedure.
  3. Previous history of receiving the rabies vaccine.
  4. Previous history of receiving rabies immune globulin.
  5. Any major psychiatric disorder, such as severe depression, severe anxiety disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, other major psychiatric disorders, or seizures. History of mild depression or anxiety disorder that is well controlled is not an exclusion criteria.
  6. Any history of cardiac arrhythmias, such as: Bradycardia, tachycardia, heart block, SVT, PAC, VF, VT, or any other conduction abnormalities.
  7. Use of any immunosuppressive drug , including topical steroids of potency groups I, II or III within 30 days of the study period.
  8. Any immunosuppressive disorder, such as HIV, common variable, active cancers or chemotherapy.
  9. History of renal insufficiency or requiring dialysis.
  10. Any condition that would, in the opinion of the site investigator, place the subject at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the subject unable to meet the requirements of the protocol.
  11. Identified as an employee of the Investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that Investigator or study center, as well as family members (i.e., immediate, husband, wife and their children, adopted or natural) of the employee or the Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Rabies vaccine IM 3 dose
Intramuscular injection: 1mL at 0, 7 and 21 days. An additional 1 mL intramuscular dose at day 365
Drug: Rabies vaccine
Compare dose schedule and route of administration
Other Names:
  • Rabavert
Experimental: Rabies vaccine ID 3 dose
Intradermal injection: 0.1mL at 0, 7 and 21 days. A single intramuscular 1 mL dose at day 365
Drug: Rabies vaccine
Compare dose schedule and route of administration
Other Names:
  • Rabavert
Experimental: Rabies vaccine IM 2 dose
Intramuscular injection: 1mL at 0, 7 days. An additional 1 mL intramuscular dose at day 365
Drug: Rabies vaccine
Compare dose schedule and route of administration
Other Names:
  • Rabavert
Experimental: Rabies vaccine ID 2 dose
Intradermal injection: 0.1mL at 0, 7 days. A single intramuscular 1 mL dose at day 365
Drug: Rabies vaccine
Compare dose schedule and route of administration
Other Names:
  • Rabavert
Placebo Comparator: Placebo IM 1 dose
Albumin and saline comparator, Intramuscular injection: 1mL
Drug: Placebo
Placebo
Other Names:
  • Albumin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo ID 1 dose
Albumin and saline comparator, Intradermal injection: 0.1mL
Drug: Placebo
Placebo
Other Names:
  • Albumin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Protective Humoral Immune Response at 1 Month Post First Vaccination.
Time Frame: 1 month post first vaccination
Percentage of subjects achieving the protective titer of ≥ 0.5 IU/ml against rabies virus
1 month post first vaccination
Protective Humoral Immune Response 12 Months Post First Vaccination.
Time Frame: 12 months post first vaccination
Percentage of subjects achieving the protective titer of ≥ 0.5 IU/ml against rabies virus 12 months post vaccinations (prior to boost).
12 months post first vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Protective Humoral Immune Response 7 Days Post Booster at 12 Months Post First Vaccination.
Time Frame: up to 13 months post first vaccination
Percentage of subjects achieving the protective titer of ≥ 0.5 IU/ml against rabies virus at 7 days post boost.
up to 13 months post first vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Polhemus, MD, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 24, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 22, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 568085

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings