Reducing Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation (RaDIANT) Regional Study

May 17, 2024 updated by: Rachel Patzer, Emory University

Reducing Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation: The RaDIANT Regional Study

The purpose of this study is to facilitate coordination of transplant centers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia to share kidney transplant referral data in patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) who are candidates for kidney transplantation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Disparities exist in access to kidney transplantation where poor and minority patients are less likely to access each step of the kidney transplant process. Current national surveillance data does not capture information on transplant referral, and it is unclear to what extent dialysis facility-level factors may influence disparities in access to transplantation. Due to significant variability in the standardized transplant ratios observed at each facility, the investigators hypothesize that there may be facility-related reasons that impact disparities in access to the first step of the kidney transplant process -- referral to the transplant center to undergo an evaluation for the suitability for transplant.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
440

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Research assistants from GA transplant centers will contact ~1500 patients via phone. These are patients that were referred for kidney transplant in 2014 that did and did not start the evaluation process. Verbal consent will be obtained, and then conduct the surveys by phone to ensure that patients with any literacy or visual barriers are included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Kidney transplant centers in the geographic area of North Carolina (NC), South Carolina (SC) and Georgia (GA)
  2. Low rates of referral for kidney transplantation (6-month crude referral risk mean of 0.06 and all facilities with a crude referral risk less than the mean)
  3. The presence of a racial disparity (African American vs. Caucasian) in referrals for kidney transplantation (racial disparity calculated based on the crude referral risk difference and the standardized referral risk difference.)

The final pool of 440 facilities will be randomized to either the intervention or control group using a one to one ratio.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Close out date populated
  2. Transplant and hospital-based facility
  3. Home dialysis facility
  4. Patient census <25
  5. >100 miles from nearest transplant center
  6. Non-profit facility (except Wake Forest University Dialysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Control
Two hundred twenty (220) dialysis facilities will follow standard of care practices in their management of ESRD patients. They will not receive interventions, but they will have access to standard educational materials and quality improvement through End Stage Renal Disease Network 6.
Intensive Intervention
Two hundred twenty (220) dialysis facilities will follow standard of care practices and the intensive intervention in their management of ESRD patients. The intensive intervention will consist of 1) A multi-module, secure, web-enabled software application called Transplant Referral EXchange (T-REX) to enhance coordination between dialysis and transplant staff and track ESRD patients through the seven primary steps to transplant , 2) educational webinars/seminars for staff, 3) facility-specific performance feedback reports, 4) assistance with and review of center-specific action plans to increase transplant referral, 5) scheduled bi-annual phone calls with an SETC member to monitor progress, 6) patient education on transplant via creation of an Education Station in facility lobby, and 7) development of a Peer Mentor program.
Other: Intensive Intervention
I.A multi-module, secure, web-enabled software application called Transplant Referral EXchange (T-REX):1) real-time communication between staff across healthcare settings, documenting the use of transplant education materials, 2) sending/receiving electronic referrals for transplant specific to a transplant center's requirements and 3) tracking patients' status in the transplant process (e.g., patient interest in transplant, referral for transplant, evaluation start/completion, waitlist status, and transplant) II. Educational webinars/seminars for staff, III. Facility-specific performance feedback reports, IV. Assistance with and review of center-specific action plans to increase transplant referral, V. Scheduled bi-annual phone calls with an SETC member to monitor progress, VI. Patient education on transplant via creation of an Education Station in facility lobby, VII. Development of a Peer Mentor program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Referral Disparity from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, one year after completion of the intervention
Assessed by referral disparity ratio: percentage of African American patients over percentage of white patients referred (%AA referred/%white referred) to compare across intervention and control facilities at baseline and one year after completion of the intervention. This is a facility level outcome.
Baseline, one year after completion of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in medical evaluation start racial disparity and waitlisting racial disparity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months after referral, one year after the start of medical evaluation
Assessed by the racial disparity ratio (%AA/%white) by facility group (control or experimental) for medical evaluation start within 6 months of referral and placement on the waitlist within 1 year of initiating the medical evaluation. This is a facility level outcome.
Baseline, 6 months after referral, one year after the start of medical evaluation
Change in number of referrals between Control and Experimental patients from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months after referral, one year after referral
Number of individual-patient referrals within 1 year of dialysis start, medical evaluation start within 6 months among those referred, and waitlisting within 1 year among those who start evaluation, among experimental vs. control patients.
Baseline, 6 months after referral, one year after referral

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Emory University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rachel Patzer, PhD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00079596
  • 5U01MD010611-05 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings