Effect of Family-Centered Empowerment Model
Family-Centered Empowerment Model With Four-stage Including Perceived Threat With Group Discussion Method, Self-efficacy With Problem Solving Method, Self-esteem With Educational Partnership, and Outcome and Process Evaluations
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being within the age-range of 45 to 85 years old
- having the minimum literacy for reading and writing
- being hospitalized due to MI for the first time
- verification of MI by clinical symptoms
- enzyme-serum tests and cardiograph changes
- lack of participation in the any related educational course simultaneously with the execution of intervention
- patients' willingness toward participating in the research
- having no psychological problems
- ability to fill out the questionnaire and participating in the empowerment program.
Exclusion Criteria:
- any offending items from mentioned criteria.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Family-Centered Empowerment Model
Have the same in-patient, pre-intervention, and post-intervention follow-up care as Control Group.
However, rather than routine care and follow-up during the intervention period, they recieved than 4 stage intervention using the Family Centered Empowerment Model.
|
FCEM and Control groups had similar inpatient care.
Patients in the intervention group received care employing the FCEM in four stages.
Stage 1: Awareness and cognition.
During 3-5 group sessions they were evaluated for their insight into their perceived illness severity and perceived sensitivity, or the degree to which they felt threatened by their illness.
Stage 2: Expectations.
3-5 sessions.
Stage 3: Acceptance.
Assessed using an educational participation method in group discussion.
Stage 4: Formative summative evaluations.
The formative evaluation encourages patients to internalize their locus of control by seeing his/her self-empowerment (increasing self-responsibility about their health).
Summative evaluations were performed to evaluate the influence of the intervention on HRQoL dimensions, perceived stress and anxiety -- assessed at baseline and at 3 months post-intervention.
Empowerment was measured at baseline and at 10 days post-intervention by deploying FCEM questionnaires.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Same in-patient, pre-intervention, and post-intervention follow-up care as Experimental Group.
However, rather than 4 stage intervention they receive routine care and follow-up.
|
FCEM and Control groups had similar inpatient care.
Upon discharge the Control group underwent routine care and follow-up.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 10-year
|
5-year, 7-year, and 10-year mortality rates of MI survivors who received a FCEM-focused hybrid CR program as intervention group compared with those who received a standard CR program as control group
|
10-year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Stress
Time Frame: 48 months
|
14-item Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-14)
|
48 months
|
|
Anxiety
Time Frame: 48 months
|
Beck 20-Item state and 20-Item trait anxiety Questionnaires
|
48 months
|
|
Level of quality of life
Time Frame: 48 months
|
the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
|
48 months
|
|
psychological distress
Time Frame: 48 months
|
Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
|
48 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ejection Fraction
Time Frame: 48 months
|
Measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography
|
48 months
|
|
Independent functioning
Time Frame: 48 months
|
Barthel Index (BI) activities of daily living index
|
48 months
|
|
Functional exercise capacity status
Time Frame: 48 months
|
six-minute walk test (6MWT), and free walking index (FWI)
|
48 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amir vahedian-azimi, Resea fellow, BMSU
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BMSU
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.