Screening Strategy for Asymptomatic Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) in a Cohort of HIV Outpatients Men Who Have Sex With Men (DRIVER) (DRIVER)

July 13, 2018 updated by: Hopital Foch

Asymptomatic Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) : Comparison of Two Screening Strategies Routine Screening Versus Screening as Reported by the Risks Taken by the Patient, in a Cohort of HIV Outpatients Men Who Have Sex With Men

Comparison of two screening strategies of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections : routine screening versus screening as reported by the risks taken by the patient, in a cohort of HIV outpatients men who have sex with men. The aim of this study will be create and validate a simple tool for clinicians. A digital tool will be developed will allowed empowerment of HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Main objectives are :

create and validate a risk score for STIs (DRIVER score) in a population of HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM).

determine the prevalence of asymptomatic STIs in a population of HIV-positive MSM

Secondary objectives are :

compare 2 screening strategies regarding STIs in HIV-positive MSM (systematic screening vs screening according to self-declared risk factors) conduct a cost-efficiency analysis of both strategies evaluate patients' knowledge of STIs develop a DRIVER digital tool that will be made available to patients on websites, mobile apps…

Position of the problem :

Over the past 15 years, a resurgence of symptomatic STIs has been observed at both at the global and at the local (French) level. This has been true for gonorrhea since 2008, for syphilis since 2000 and for lymphogranuloma venereum since 2003. The epidemiology of asymptomatic STIs has not been studied as thoroughly but asymptomatic carriage of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis as well as latent syphilis account for at least half of cases declared in the past few years. The population of HIV-positive MSM is the demographic category with the highest rates of STIs. In addition, risky sexual attitudes are on the rise in the MSM population in general (in 2010, the French RESIST Network reported that condom use during anal penetrations between males had dropped from 49% in 2008 to 37% in 2010).

Screening practices are currently center- and healthcare-provider dependant. Study will allow a comparison of screening practices thanks to a score that will be built, validated and made available to clinicians and patients.

Type of study : Prospective, non randomized, multicentric and cross-sectional Timeline : Study duration : 18 months Beginning of study : March 2015

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
495

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Argenteuil, France, 95107
        • CH Argenteuil
      • Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 92104
        • CHU Ambroise Pare
      • Colombes, France, 92700
        • CHU Louis Mourier
      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Hopital Raymond Poincare
      • Jossigny, France, 77600
        • CH Marne La Vallée
      • Le Chesnay, France, 78150
        • Hôpital Mignot-centre hospitalier de versailles
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • Ch Bicetre
      • Levallois-Perret, France, 92300
        • Hôpital Franco-Britannique
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
      • Paris, France, 75004
        • Hotel Dieu
      • Paris, France, 750015
        • CHU Necker
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Hôpital de Saint-Antoine
      • Paris, France, 75475
        • CHU St Louis
      • Saint-Germain en Laye, France, 78100
        • CHI Poissy/ Saint-Germain en Laye
      • Villeneuve Saint-Georges, France, 94190
        • CHI Villeneuve Saint-Georges,
    • Hauts DE Seine
      • Suresnes, Hauts DE Seine, France, 92150
        • Hopital Foch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV positive outpatients
  • Men who have sex with men
  • Speaking, literate french
  • Having a french health insurance or an equivalent
  • Asymptomatic for a STI the appointment day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men who never had sex with men
  • Protected adults (adults under guardianship)
  • Have a STI symptom ( anal discharge, urethritis, proctitis, chancre, rush)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: First period

creation of a STIs score risk

pharyngeal swab+urinary collection+blood specimens+rectal Chlamydia trachomatis l Neisseria gonorrhoeae (CT/GC) testing
Other: creation of a STIs score risk
4 questionnaires 3 screening test ( syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea)
Other Names:
  • First period
Other: Second period

validation of a STIs score risk

pharyngeal swab+urinary collection+blood specimens+rectal Chlamydia trachomatis l Neisseria gonorrhoeae (CT/GC) testing
Other: validation of a STIs score risk
DRIVER questionnaire (DRIVER STI score risk) 3 screening test ( syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea)
Other Names:
  • Second period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexually Transmitted Infections risk score in men HIV positive
Time Frame: 6 months
Construction of a STI risk score
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cost-efficacy of a targeted screening versus universal screening
Time Frame: 12 months
conduct a cost-efficiency analysis of both strategies
12 months
patients' knowledge of STIs evaluated by a Sexually Transmitted Disease Knowledge Questionnaire (STD-KQ)
Time Frame: 3 months
patients' knowledge of STIs will be evaluate
3 months
prevalence of asymptomatic STIs in a population of HIV-positive MSM
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hopital Foch

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
Bicetre Hospital
European Georges Pompidou Hospital
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Hotel Dieu Hospital
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Hôpital Louis Mourier
Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris
Centre Hospitalier Argenteuil
Hôpital Franco-Britannique
Hôpital Lagny Marne la Vallée

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David ZUCMAN, MD, Hopital Foch

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014/50
  • 2014-A01358-39 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on creation of a STIs score risk

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings