Transplantation of Autologous Oral Mucosal Epithelial Sheets for Limbal Stem-cell Deficiency

October 10, 2019 updated by: Adisak Wongkajornsilp, Siriraj Hospital

Clinical Study of Transplantation of Autologous Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Sheets for Limbal Stem-cell Deficiency

The study purpose is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheet transplantation as a novel therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency, for which no effective approaches has thus far been available, for the purpose of establishing this therapy as an effective strategy for this disease with an aim of improving visual acuity and corneal transparency.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The efficacy and safety of cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheet transplantation as a novel therapy for limbal stem-cell deficiency, for which no effective approaches have thus far been available, will be evaluated for the purpose of establishing this therapy as an effective strategy for this disease with an aim of improving visual acuity and corneal transparency. The primary endpoint will be an area of no conjunctivalization and no corneal epithelial defect at one year, which will be evaluated according to a 6-grade rating scale. The secondary endpoints will be corrected visual acuity, severity of corneal opacification, extent of corneal neovascularization, expected ocular complications, and all adverse events including abnormal laboratory findings. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of the investigational therapy so as to provide rationales for making this strategy approved as an advanced medical care in the future.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
    • Bangkok
      • Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Clinical Research Center, Siriraj Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Among patients with bilateral limbal stem-cell deficiency, those who meet all the criteria listed below when they give their informed consent to participate in this research will be included.

    1. Patients in whom the eye(s) (subject to the interventional therapy) show(s) loss or dysfunction of corneal epithelial stem cells throughout the total* circumference of the cornea
    2. Patients in whom the corneal surface of the eye(s) (subject to the investigational therapy) is(are) entirely enveloped by conjunctival tissue
    3. Patients of both genders aged ≥20 years when they give their informed consent
    4. Patients who have given their own written consent to participate in this clinical research (The target disease is bilateral limbal stem-cell deficiency, although it is not always necessary that the both eyes of the patient meet the inclusion criteria.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are or may be pregnant, and patients who are breast feeding
  2. Patients with infections (HBV, HCV, HIV, HTLV-1)
  3. Patients with extreme hypolacrimation resistant to therapy
  4. Patients from whom oral mucosal specimens cannot be collected because clear scar formation or inflammatory findings are noted in a cell-collection site of the mucosal membrane
  5. Patients whose score of Performance Status (PS*) is 3 or more
  6. Any others who are judged by the chief subinvestigator to be ineligible for this clinical research, due to the presence of complications, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Mucosal cell sheet transplantation
The subjects will have their oral mucosal tissues retrieved for cell sheet preparation. The mucosal cell sheet will be transplanted over the affected cornea.
Biological: Mucosal cell sheet transplantation
The subjects will have their oral mucosal tissues retrieved for cell sheet preparation. The mucosal cell sheet will be transplanted over the affected cornea.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of conjunctivalization and corneal epithelial defect
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
One year after the transplantation, an area of no conjunctivalization and no corneal epithelial defect will be rated according to the Grading scale described in Table 2, on the basis of which the efficacy of the investigational therapy will be assessed. Generally, the preoperative condition of ocular surface is rated as "Bad (Grading 0)." In subjects showing improvement to Grading 2 or greater, the investigational therapy will be assessed as effective.
1 year after transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corrected visual acuity (efficacy)
Time Frame: 1 year
Corrected visual acuity will be evaluated by the decimal acuity method and converted to Log MAR values, which will be used to assess the extent of postoperative change in visual acuity. Note that 0.005 will be given to "counting fingers," 0.002, to "hand motion," and 0.001, to "light perception" 14). Visual acuity will be measured before transplantation, and 1, 3, and 6 months as well as one year after transplantation.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Siriraj Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Osaka University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Adisak Wongkajornsilp, M.D., Ph.D., Mahidol University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 17, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 3, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 16, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 662/2555(EC2)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Limbal Stem-cell Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Mucosal cell sheet transplantation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings