Corpus Luteum and Uterine Artery Doppler With Serum P and CA125 in Threatened Abortion (CLCA125)

December 5, 2017 updated by: Nesreen Abdel Fattah Abdullah Shehata

Color Doppler of CL and Uterine Artery With Serum Progesterone and CA125 in Threatened Abortion

The purpose of this study is to determine whether assessing color doppler of corpus luteum and uterine artery is useful in predicting patients who will complete pregnancy. The investigators will add to this the usefulness of serum progesterone and CA125 in prediction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The introduction of Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics has allowed evaluating hemodynamic characteristics from the first trimester of pregnancy. For example, Kurjak et al.,in one of the first studies using transvaginal pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound in early pregnancies, identified the uterine arteries in 100% of the patients. The flow blood of the corpus luteum was identified in 75% patients. The measures obtained by Doppler ultrasonography that may have prognostic value to the evolution of pregnancy include uteroplacental blood flow, also known as trophoblastic flow. Jaffe et al. reported that abnormal Doppler findings were associated with a significantly higher prevalence of complicated pregnancies, among women with abnormal Doppler findings, 43% ended in miscarriage, whereas among women with normal findings only 1.4% of women miscarried.Progesterone plays a crucial role in the maintenance of pregnancy. In the presence of sufficient progesterone levels during pregnancy, lymphocytes synthesize a mediator called progesterone induced blocking factor (PIBF), which is anti-abortive in mice . Besides inducing secretary changes in the endometrium and supporting early pregnancy, it modulates the maternal immune response to prevent fetal rejection and relaxes the uterine smooth muscles .CA-125, well-known as a tumor marker for epithelial ovarian cancer , is a high molecular weight glycoprotein that is produced not only by ovarian cancer, but also by nonovarian tumors, normal epithelia of the peritoneum, the endometrium, the fallopian tube, and the ovary. Because CA-125 is also produced by the endometrium, some authors suggest that CA-125 can be used as a marker for endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing IVF . Its role as a predictor for pregnancy outcome is controversial .

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 018
        • Beni-Suef University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant females >8 weeks but < 20 weeks gestation. They are presenting with a complaint of threatened abortion to our outpatient ANC clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with pregnancy between 8 to 20 weeks of gestation,
  • who were diagnosed with threatened abortion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with multiple pregnancies,
  • molar pregnancy,
  • ectopic pregnancy,
  • amenorrhea with different etiologies of pregnancy,
  • maternal history of systemic diseases and uterine anatomic abnormalities
  • patients who did not have their outcome data through week 20 of gestation due to relocation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Threatened abortion
Pregnant patients > 8 weeks gestation coming to the ANC clinic with mild vaginal bleeding but healthy viable intrauterine pregnancy. Vaginal color doppler for uterine artery and corpus luteum together with serum progesterone and CA125 will be assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Viable fetus (According to WHO viable fetus >500 gm or > 20 weeks)
Time Frame: from 20 weeks till 21 weeks gestation
The investigators will assess how many patients in both groups reached viability of fetus. According to WHO viable fetus >500 gm or > 20 weeks.
from 20 weeks till 21 weeks gestation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resistance index of uterine artery and corpus luteum
Time Frame: from 8 weeks till 20 weeks
Vaginal color doppler of uterine artery and corpus luteum for all pregnant patients in the study at first visit in ANC clinic .
from 8 weeks till 20 weeks
serum CA125 and progesterone
Time Frame: from 8 weeks till 20 weeks gestation
serum CA125 and progesterone will be done for all pregnant patients at first visit in ANC clinic
from 8 weeks till 20 weeks gestation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nesreen Abdel Fattah Abdullah Shehata

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Beni-Suef University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nesreen A Shehata, MD, Beni-Suef University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Beni-Suef 9

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Threatened Abortion

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings