Neurological Outcome in Surgical and Non-surgical Septic Patients (NOSEPP)

April 19, 2017 updated by: Dr. Martin Sauer, MD, University of Rostock

Prospective Observational Study: Comparison of Neurological Outcome in Septic Surgical, Septic Non-surgical and Non-septic Patients on ICU

Systemic inflammation and sepsis cause multi organ failure including severe neurologic impairment in the course of disease. Neurologic failure typically presents as critical-illness-polyneuropathy/-myopathy and septic encephalopathy during sepsis and is associated with an increased mortality rate.

Clinical parameters to determine the neurologic entities during the course of sepsis are heterogeneous. Further research for an association of clinical parameters and the patients' outcome is needed.

The study aims toward differences in the clinical and neurological outcome of surgical and non-surgical septic patients in comparison to non-septic patients on ICU. The aim of the study is to identify clinical and diagnostic outcome predictors in septic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

All patients with severe sepsis and septic shock and fulfilling the inclusion criteria should be screened for the study on two surgical (septic surgical patients), one medical intensive care unit (septic non-surgical patients) and one neurological intensive care unit (non-septic patients) at the university hospital of Rostock, Germany.

The inclusion of patients will be started if written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their representatives (if direct consent could not be obtained).

The aim of the study is to determine differences in the neurological outcome of surgical and non-surgical septic patients (incidence, severity and length of critical-illness-polyneuropathy/-myopathy and septic encephalopathy). The main interest of the study is to find parameters associated with an improved neurological outcome in septic patients within an observation time of 100 days.

The main criterion is the incidence, severity and length of septic encephalopathy and critical-illness-polyneuropathy and -myopathy on days 7 and 28.

From all patients basic demographic data, illness severity scores (APACHE-II, SOFA) and delirium scores for the assessment of septic encephalopathy (CAM-ICU, ICDSC), laboratory, cerebrospinal fluid and microbiological results, electrophysiological (electroneurography(ENG)), electroencephalography (EEG), cranial MRI results, pre-morbidity data and clinical outcome for the study cohort will be recorded. At the days 1, 3, 7 and 28 the patients will be screened for clinical and laboratory/immunological data: hemodynamic, inflammation, coagulation, organ function, blood parameters including cytokines.

Neurological examination and EEG will be performed within 24 hours after the beginning of the study. Examination of liquor cerebrospinalis will be performed within 24-48 hours and cranial MRI between day 3 and 7 after the inclusion of the patient. ENG will be done earliest one week after the beginning of the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Rostock, Germany, 18055
        • Intensive Care Units PIT 1+2, University hospital Rostock

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with severe sepsis and septic shock and fulfilling the inclusion criteria should be screened for the study on two surgical (septic surgical patients), one medical intensive care unit (septic non-surgical patients) and one neurological intensive care unit (non-septic patients) at the university hospital of Rostock, Germany.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilling criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (pre-existing)
  • Advanced dementia
  • Diagnosis of pre-existing other neuromuscular disease
  • High-dose glucocorticosteroid therapy (> 300 mg Hydrocortisone/die)
  • Pre-existing renal replacement therapy
  • Coagulation disorder with bleeding
  • Frequent administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (> 3 times/week)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Septic Shock or severe sepsis
Septic patients on ICU with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Non-Septic, Surgical Patients
Non-septic patients after surgical treatment and anesthesia on ICU.
Non-Septic, Non-Surgical Patients
Patients without sepsis criteria treated on ICU, non-surgical patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Septic Encephalopathy
Time Frame: day 7
EEG, MRT, CSF (cerebrospinal fluid)
day 7
Critical-Illness-Polyneuropathy and -myopathy
Time Frame: day 7
ENG
day 7
Septic Encephalopathy (28)
Time Frame: day 28
Clinical observation.
day 28
Critical-Illness-Polyneuropathy and -myopathy (28)
Time Frame: day 28
Clinical observation.
day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
- 28-day survival (observation time 100 days)
Time Frame: day 28
Survival after 28 days.
day 28
- Time of respirator-therapy
Time Frame: 1 year
In days cumulative.
1 year
- Dosage of vasopressors (cumulative)
Time Frame: observation time 100 days
In days cumulative.
observation time 100 days
- 100 day survival
Time Frame: day 100
Survival after 100 days.
day 100

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rostock

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Martin Sauer, MD, University of Rostock

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • URostock

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopathy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings