Safety and Immunogenicity of a Zoster Vaccine in SLE

September 2, 2019 updated by: Chi Chiu Mok, Tuen Mun Hospital

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Herpes Zoster Vaccine (Zostavax) in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a Randomized Controlled Trial

To study the safety and immunogenicity of a herpes zoster vaccine in patients with SLE.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Herpes zoster (HZ) (Shingles) is a painful condition caused by reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV) that remains dormant after primary infection. HZ reactivation may cause significant morbidity such as post-herpetic neuralgia and even mortality for disseminated infection, particularly in immunocompromised individuals.

HZ vaccine (Zostavax) is essentially a larger-than-normal dose of the chickenpox vaccine, which contains the Oka strain of live attenuated VZV. Zostavax has been shown to be safe and protective in immunocompetent elderly populations (>60 years of age) by reducing reactivation of HZ by 51% and post-herpetic neuralgia by 66%. Another study also demonstrated efficacy of Zostavax in reducing HZ infection by 70% in adults aged 50-59 years.

Data regarding the use of HZ vaccine in patients with rheumatic diseases are scant. A recent observational study involving 463,541 US patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis showed that 4% of patients had received HZ vaccination. After a median observation period of 2 years, the rate HZ reactivation among vaccinated patients was significantly lower than that of unvaccinated group (hazard ratio 0.61 [0.52-0.71]). Among 633 patients exposed to biologics at the time of vaccination, no cases of HZ or varicella infection occurred in the subsequent 42 days after vaccination. Thus, the vaccine appears to be safe in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases even receiving the biological agents.

HZ reactivation is fairly common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

However, data regarding HZ vaccination in SLE patients are generally lacking. Safety and efficacy of HZ vaccination has recently been demonstrated in other immunocompromised groups such as HIV infection, post-chemotherapy and hematological malignancies. According to the 2011 EULAR recommendation, HZ vaccination may be considered in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases provided that they are less seriously immunosuppressed.

The current study is designed to test for the immunogenicity and safety of a HZ vaccine (Zostavax) in patients with stable SLE who are receiving minimal immunosuppressive therapies for maintenance.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Hong Kong, China, 000
        • Department of Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. SLE patients who fulfill ≥4 of the 1997 ACR (17) or the 2012 SLICC/ACR criteria for SLE (18)
  2. Age ≥18 years
  3. Clinically inactive disease with SELENA-SLEDAI score <6 (see below) and receiving stable dose of immunosuppressive agents for ≥6 months
  4. History of varicella (chickenpox) or herpes zoster infection in the past
  5. Willing to comply with all study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active infection, including upper respiratory tract infection
  2. Active untreated tuberculosis
  3. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  4. Lymphocyte count <500/mm2
  5. Reduced serum IgG, IgA or IgM level (below normal range)
  6. Serum creatinine >200umol/L
  7. History of hematological malignancies (eg. lymphoma, leukaemia) and other solid tumors

  8. Patients receiving doses of immunosuppressive agents exceeding the following:

    • Prednisolone (>15mg) or equivalent
    • Azathioprine (>100mg/day)
    • Mycophenolate mofetil (>1000mg/day)
    • Cyclosporin A (>100mg/day)
    • Tacrolimus (>3mg/day)
    • Methotrextate (>15mg/week)
    • Cyclophosphamide (any dose)
    • Biological agents eg. rituximab, belimumab (any dose)
  9. Patients who are pregnant or plan to become pregnancy within one year of study entry
  10. Patients who cannot give a written consent (mentally incapable or illiterate)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: SLE (vaccine)
Zostavax SC injection (0.65ml)
Biological: Zostavax
Vaccination of a zoster vaccine (Zostavax)
Placebo Comparator: SLE (placebo)
Placebo SC injection (normal saline 0.65ml)
Biological: placebo
placebo administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
antibody rise to varicella zoster virus
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Difference between the two groups in the proportion of patients who achieve a two-fold rise in IgG to VZV at week 6 post-vaccination compared to baseline
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
safety (incidence of herpes zoster reactivation or chickenpox infection)
Time Frame: week 6
incidence of herpes zoster reactivation or chickenpox infection
week 6
T cell response to VZV
Time Frame: week 6
differences between IFN release upon VZV stimulation of PBMC
week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tuen Mun Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: CC Mok, MD, Tuen Mun Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NTWC/CREC/15029

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Clinical Trials on Zostavax

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings