The Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation (ACE) Randomized CardioLink-3 Trial

September 11, 2018 updated by: Unity Health Toronto

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Axillary vs. Innominate Artery Cannulation for Antegrade Cerebral Protection in Aortic Surgery: The ACE Randomized Trial

The ACE trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled trial comparing axillary vs. innominate artery cannulation for established antegrade cerebral perfusion in patients having aortic surgery (thoracic and aortic arch) requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest using a non-inferiority trial design.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Surgery on the thoracic aorta often requires a brief period of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). The most feared complication of aortic surgery is neurological injury, which can range from mild cognitive impairment to more severe injuries such as stroke. Due to the significant morbidity and mortality associated with post-operative stroke and neurological dysfunction, cerebral protection techniques have evolved extensively. A recommended approach to cerebral protection during DHCA is to deliver blood to the brain in an antegrade fashion via the arterial system, so called antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP). Axillary artery cannulation, a form of ACP, has become the preferred method of neuroprotection for aortic operations requiring DHCA. However, axillary artery cannulation requires more surgical time and presents potential complications such as brachial plexus injury, seromas, and limb ischemia. The present study aims to determine whether a less common alternative strategy, innominate artery cannulation, offers similar neuroprotection compared to axillary artery cannulation and reduces operative times. A total of 110 patients undergoing elective aortic surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two strategies. The primary outcome will be the number of patients with new ischemic lesions found on post-operative diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and total operative time.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B1W8
        • St Michael's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. Elective aortic arch operation.
  3. Planned open distal anastamosis with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients undergoing surgery for aortic dissection or urgent/emergent operation.
  2. Patients undergoing surgery for total aortic arch replacement.
  3. Patients who are unable to undergo MRI scan (such as due to claustrophobia).
  4. Use of an investigational drug or device at the time of enrolment
  5. Participation in another clinical trial which interferes with performance of the study procedures or assessment of the outcomes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Axillary artery cannulation
Axillary artery cannulation for antegrade cerebral perfusion
Procedure: Axillary artery cannulation
The right axillary artery will be exposed via an infraclavicular incision and a Dacron graft sewn to it in an end to side fashion after 5000 units of IV heparin. Following median sternotomy and full systemic heparinization, CPB will be initiated and the patient cooled. The base of the innominate artery will be clamped, and antegrade cerebral perfusion will be provided via the axillary artery. Following completion of the distal open aortic anastomosis, the clamp on the innominate artery will be removed, CPB via the aorta will be resumed and the patient will be rewarmed. After completion of surgery and weaning from CPB, the axillary artery graft will then be removed, the artery repaired and the skin will be closed.
Active Comparator: Innominate artery cannulation
Innominate artery cannulation for antegrade cerebral perfusion
Procedure: Innominate artery cannulation
After median sternotomy, systemic heparinization, cannulation of the ascending aorta and right atrium, CPB and systemic cooling will be initiated. The ascending aorta, proximal arch and the base of the innominate artery will be mobilized. Purse-string sutures are placed on the anterior wall of the proximal innominate artery and a pediatric venous cannula inserted using a J wire and sequential dilatation. Circulatory arrest with ACP is provided by clamping the base of the innominate artery and connecting the afferent limb of the CPB circuit to the innominate cannula. Once the distal aortic anastomosis is completed, ACP is discontinued, and full CPB via the aortic graft is resumed. Rewarming and the remaining surgery are then completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
new severe ischemic lesions
Time Frame: Post-operative day 4
The primary safety endpoint of this trial is the proportion of patients with new severe ischemic lesions found on post-operative DW-MRI compared with pre-operative MRI.
Post-operative day 4
Total operative time
Time Frame: Intra-operative
The primary efficacy endpoint of this trial is the difference in total operative time between the innominate artery cannulation group and the axillary artery cannulation group.
Intra-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30-day
30-day
Stroke or TIA (transient ischemic attack)
Time Frame: 30-day
30-day
Neurocognitive dysfunction
Time Frame: Post-operative day 4
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Post-operative day 4
Number of new ischemic lesions
Time Frame: Post-operative day 4
assessed by DW-MRI
Post-operative day 4
Volume of new ischemic lesions
Time Frame: Post-operative day 4
assessed by DW-MRI
Post-operative day 4
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Time Frame: Post-operative day 4
assessed by DW-MRI
Post-operative day 4
S100B and Neuron Specific Enolase
Time Frame: 24 hours post-op
Post-operative serum level of circulating biomarkers of neuronal injury
24 hours post-op
Post-operative sepsis, delirium, seizure, encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, post-operative myocardial infarction, re-operation
Time Frame: 30-day
30-day
Seroma, brachial plexus injury, reduced arm mobility and pain, arm ischemia
Time Frame: 30-day
30-day

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cerebral oximetry desaturation
Time Frame: intra-operative
intra-operative
CPB (cardiopulmonary bypass) time
Time Frame: intra-operative
intra-operative
Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time
Time Frame: intra-operative
intra-operative
Antegrade cerebral perfusion time
Time Frame: intra-operative
intra-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Unity Health Toronto

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
London Health Sciences Centre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Mazer, MD, Unity Health Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15-071

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings