Cranberry Extract and Urinary Infection Prevention: a Clinical Trial (PACCANN)

September 7, 2016 updated by: Sylvie Dodin, Laval University

Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Prevention With Biologic Cranberry Extract Intake Standardized in Proanthocyanidins: A Double-blind Clinical Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial study is to assess, among young and sexually active women presenting recurrent urinary tract infection (UTIs), efficacy of an optimal dose of cranberry extract quantified and standardized to 37 mg/day of Proanthocyanidins (PACs), compared to a control dose quantified and standardized to 2 mg/day of PACs on mean number of new UTIs during a 6-month follow-up period.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cranberry juice, fruit (fresh and dried), functional foods, and cranberry dietary supplements are promoted for prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) on the basis of their content of cranberry proanthocyanidins (PACs) with "A-type" interflavan bonds. Several clinical trials have assessed efficacy of cranberry-derived products, essentially with cranberry juices, but discordant results have been found. Lack of compliance but mostly lack of standardization in product concentrations can account for the variability among results. Indeed, most clinical trials do not report quantity of PACs. According to most recent studies, quantification of PACs requiring standardized and reproducible methods should be at least 37 mg/day. It can be hypothesized that efficacy of cranberry extract in UTIs prevention among young women can be strongly increased using optimal dosage (standardized to 37 mg/day of PACs). The purpose of this clinical trial study is to assess, among young and sexually active women presenting recurrent UTIs, efficacy of an optimal dose of cranberry extract quantified and standardized to 37 mg/day of PACs, compared to a control dose quantified and standardized to 2 mg/day of PACs on mean number of new UTIs during a 6-month follow-up period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
140

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy and sexually active women
  • Aged between 18 to 45 years old
  • Recurrence of 2 UTIs in the past 6 months or 3 in the past year
  • Do not have consumed cranberry juice, polyphenols or antioxidant supplements in the last 2 weeks
  • Internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who have personal history of acute or chronic renal failure
  • Women who have personal history of urogenital system anomalies, urogenital tractus surgery or intestinal diseases causing malabsorption (e.g., Crohn and celiac diseases)
  • Women who have personal history of kidney stones, taking anticoagulant medication or have taken anticoagulant medication in the last month
  • Women presenting cranberry allergy or intolerance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Optimal dose
One capsule with a proanthocyanidins standardized cranberry extract of 18,5 mg twice a day, i.e. in the morning and at night.
Dietary supplement: Cranberry extract
The aim of this clinical trial is to assess efficacy of an optimal dose of cranberry extract compared to a control dose on mean number of new UTIs for a 6-month period follow-up in women. Participants will be randomly assigned to the optimal dose or control dose treatment at their first visit at the Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods. This intervention includes three visits at 0, 12 and 24 weeks. At the first visit, women will have to complete questionnaires to provide sociodemographic, medication and natural health products, health antecedents and quality of life information and to document risk factors related to UTIs. A 24-hour recall questionnaire about consumption of PACs will also be completed. A urinary sample analysis and culture as well as a pregnant test will also be performed. Compliance regarding capsules' intake and potential side effects will be documented. The completion of questionnaires and urinary measurements will be repeated at weeks 12 and 24.
Placebo Comparator: Control dose
One capsule with a proanthocyanidins standardized cranberry extract of 1 mg twice a day, i.e. in the morning and at night.
Dietary supplement: Cranberry extract
The aim of this clinical trial is to assess efficacy of an optimal dose of cranberry extract compared to a control dose on mean number of new UTIs for a 6-month period follow-up in women. Participants will be randomly assigned to the optimal dose or control dose treatment at their first visit at the Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods. This intervention includes three visits at 0, 12 and 24 weeks. At the first visit, women will have to complete questionnaires to provide sociodemographic, medication and natural health products, health antecedents and quality of life information and to document risk factors related to UTIs. A 24-hour recall questionnaire about consumption of PACs will also be completed. A urinary sample analysis and culture as well as a pregnant test will also be performed. Compliance regarding capsules' intake and potential side effects will be documented. The completion of questionnaires and urinary measurements will be repeated at weeks 12 and 24.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mean number of urinary tract infections
Time Frame: Within a 6-month period
Within a 6-month period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laval University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Quebec
Nutra Canada

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sylvie Dodin, M.Sc., MD., Laval University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PACCANN_2015

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings