GENESIS: Genetic Biopsy for Prediction of Surveillance Intervals After Endoscopic Resection of Colonic Polyps (GENESIS)

November 2, 2016 updated by: Thomas Seufferlein, University of Ulm
Colorectal cancer ist the 2nd most leading cancer among men and women in germany. Screening colonoscopy has the potential to detect premalignant lesions. By endoscopical resection of these lesions, colorectal cancers could be avoided. The decision for surveillance is made according to patients medical history, amount and histological characteristics of the resected polyps. Molecular guided decisions are still missing. Thus, further tools and mechanisms, beyond but in addition to endoscopy and histopathological, are strongly required to reduce such interval carcinomas and get a better and deeper inside into molecular alterations which occurs in premalignant lesions in the colon and describe risk populations which might benefit from shorter surveillance strategies by colonoscopy. Therefore GENESIS will enroll 100 patients, which underwent screening colonoscopy with polyp ectomy. All biopsies were stored and processed without formalin in special boxes (PaxGene by Qiagen®). After microdissection of polyp tissue and isolation of DNA targeted next generation sequencing of 38 cancer-related genes followed by bioinformatics and systems biology analyses. The sequencing results were correlated to the endoscopical and histopathological findings. In parallel we are collecting EDTA-blood samples for analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to investigate the potential of liquid biopsies in premalignant colorectal lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer ist the 2nd most leading cancer among men and women in germany. Screening colonoscopy is provided for all people over 55 years in germany to detect and remove precancerous lesions (polyps) and thereby prevent the occurence of colorectal cancers. According to the result of screening colonoscopy and histopathological examination of the removed polyps the next examination will be planned. But so called interval carcinomas were observed with increasing incidence. Thus, further tools and mechanisms, beyond but in addition to endoscopy and histopathology, are strongly required to reduce such interval carcinomas and get a better and deeper inside into molecular alterations which occurs in premalignant lesions in the colon and describe risk populations which might benefit from shorter surveillance strategies by colonoscopy. Therefore we will enroll 100 patients, which underwent screening colonoscopy with polyp ectomy. Each polyp, provided for endoscopical removal, well be biopsied and stored separately. In each case, diagnosis is ensured. Per patient a maximum of 6 biopsies (from 6 different polyps) is intended. All biopsies were stored and processed without formalin in special boxes (PaxGene by Qiagen®). After microdissection of polyp tissue and isolation of DNA targeted next generation sequencing of 38 genes (ACVR1B, DCC, MIER3, SLC9A9, AKT1, DMD, MLH1, SMAD2, APC, EP300, MSH2, SMAD4, ATM, ERBB2, MSH3, TCERG1, ATP6V0D2, FBXW7, MSH6, TCF7L2, BAX, FZD3, MYO1B, TGFBR2, BRAF, GPC6, NRAS, TP53, CASP8, KRAS, PIK3CA, WBSCR17, CDC27, MAP2K4, PIK3R1, CTNNB1, MAP7, PTPN12) followed by bioinformatics and systems biology analyses. The sequencing results were correlated to the endoscopical and histopathological findings. In parallel we are collecting EDTA-blood samples for analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). NGS targeted sequencing of these 38 genes should also be performed on cfDNA level to investigate the potential of liquid biopsies in premalignant colorectal lesions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
101

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
    • Steiermark
      • Graz, Steiermark, Austria, 8036
        • Medical University Graz
  • Germany
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Dornstadt, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 89160
        • Specialized Medical Office for Gastroenterology
      • Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 89081
        • University Ulm, Internal Medicine I, Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn)
    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
        • Technical University Munich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • indication of screening colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic inflammatory bowl disease
  • known colorectal cancer (except curative treated colorectal cancers more than 5 years ago)
  • disagreement in participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Polypectomy and NGS
All patients which underwent screening colonoscopy and fulfilling the inclusion criteria are eligible. Polyps were biopsied and underwent histopathological and genetic analyses
Genetic: Polypectomy and NGS
NGS of 38 cancer-related genes, systems biological analyses, correlation genetics to pathology and clinical data

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Genetic landscape of colonic polyps based on NGS-analysis
Time Frame: 1 year
Are we able to describe risk populations based on clinical, histopathological and sequencing data which might bring a benefit for these cohort for shorter surveillance strategies by colonoscopy? What are the similarities in the altered genes, what are the differences? Are we able to define common signaling hubs?
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Ulm

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medical University of Graz
Technical University of Munich
QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc
Specialized Medical Office for Gastroenterology Dornstadt

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alexander G. Meining, Prof. Dr., University Ulm, Internal Medicine I, Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GENESIS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonic Polyps

Clinical Trials on Polypectomy and NGS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings