Techniques to Enhance Patient Comfort in Sedation-risk Free Colonoscopy

December 14, 2015 updated by: Felix W. Leung, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Can Simple and Inexpensive Techniques Enhance Patient Comfort in Sedation-risk Free Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy?

Hypotheses

  1. Loading the sigmoid colon with warm water and warm water irrigation for dealing with spasm (Study Treatment) will significantly reduce the proportion of patients complaining of abdominal discomfort compared with no water loading and waiting for spasms to subside (Control Treatment). The median discomfort score reported by the patients will be significantly lower in the group receiving the Study Treatment than the group receiving Control Treatment. Hypothesis
  2. Exploratory hypothesis: There are differences in secondary outcome variables when patients managed by the Study and Control Treatments are compared. Co-variables affect the primary and secondary outcome variables.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to conduct a RCT study to determine the effectiveness of loading the sigmoid colon with warm water and warm water irrigation for dealing with colonic spasms in enhancing patient abdominal comfort during unsedated colonoscopy. The specific aim is to compare Study Treatment of warm water loading and irrigation when spasms occur with Control Treatment of no water loading and waiting for spasms to subside. The proportion of patients complaining of abdominal discomfort and their discomfort score are the primary outcome variables. The secondary outcome variables and co-variables described below will be recorded in a prospective manner to ensure completeness of data collection. In preliminary clinical observation at VA Sepulveda ACC, 25 to 30% of VA patients accept colonoscopy without sedation. The goal of this study is to find ways of further reducing discomfort associated with unsedated colonoscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 91343
        • Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and the Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Accepts adult healthy male and female patients
  • At least 18 years of age
  • In need of colonoscopy for screening or follow up of colonic polyps
  • Willing to consent and be randomized

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving outpatient narcotic treatment
  • Patients who report excessive anxiety
  • Patients with moderate to severe abdominal discomfort
  • Unable to provide consent
  • Have poor bowel preparation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Warm water loading of sigmoid colon
Warm water loading of sigmoid colon and irrigation when spasms occur.
Warm water loading of sigmoid colon when spasms occur and waiting for them to subside.
Placebo Comparator: Control
No water loading, only air and waiting for spasms to subside.
Air will be used instead of warm water for unsedated colonoscopy.
Other Names:
  • air

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
abdominal discomfort
Time Frame: 30 days
Abdominal discomfort reported to a blinded observer 5-10 min after colonoscopy.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
colonoscopy-related outcomes
Time Frame: 30 days
various procedure related measures
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felix W. Leung, MD, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FL0055

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Screening of Colonic Polyps

Clinical Trials on Warm water

3
Subscribe