Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps (HOT/COLD)

February 22, 2023 updated by: Sorlandet Hospital HF

Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps. A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to investigate the comparative effectiveness between polyp removal with or without electrical current. The investigators want to include 600 polyps in the trial.

It is known that polyps have the potential to develop to cancer if left in situ, but the investigators do not know the best way to remove them completely.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study the investigators want to compare to widely used methods for polyp removal; hot and cold snare polypectomy. There has not been performed any big studies on this subject earlier, but current knowledge indicates that hot polypectomy (i.e. with use of electrical current) is somewhat better with regard to complete resection of polyps compared to cold polypectomy (without electrical current).

In this project the patients will be randomized to either hot or cold polypectomy. The investigators will distribute videos of how the polypectomies should be performed, and a gastroenterologist in the project group will instruct the doctors examining the patients to make sure that everyone performs polypectomy according to current guidelines.

The study is designed as a non-inferiority trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

429

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatient colonoscopy
  • Signed, written informed consent
  • At least one flat/sessile polyp sized 4-9 mm identified during colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted cardiac electro converter
  • Severe comorbidity (NYHA 3-4)
  • Known coagulopathy (INR > 1,8) or resent use of any of the new oral anti-coagulant medications
  • Platelet count < 100
  • Resent use of clopidogrel or other non-acetylsalicylic acid platelet inhibitor (Last dose < 5 days before the procedure)
  • Previous biopsy or attempt of polypectomy of the polyp considered for inclusion in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cold polypectomy

Patients in this arm will have their polyps removed by cold polypectomy, i.e. a metal sling that is closed around the basis of the polyp, and the polyp is cut off.

After removal there will be taken biopsies from the resection margins, and both the polyp and the biopsies will be examined by a histopathologist to see if the polyp is removed completely.

Active Comparator: Hot polypectomy

Patients in this arm will have their polyps removed by hot polypectomy, i.e. a metal sling taht is closed around the basis of the polyp, electrical currents is applied, and the polyp is cut off.

After removal there will be taken biopsies from the resection margins, and both the polyp and the biopsies will be examined by a histopathologist to see if the polyp is removed completely.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete resection rate
Time Frame: Hopefully within 4 weeks, when the histopathologist has examined the biopsies
We want to measure the rate of polyps that are resected completely, both with biopsies from the margin and the histopathologists evaluation of the resection margins of the polyp itself.
Hopefully within 4 weeks, when the histopathologist has examined the biopsies

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: 4 weeks

We want to register early (during the procedure) and late (within 4 weeks after the procedure) complications.

Complications we will record is bleeding/blood in the stool, perforation and patient contact with health care provider

4 weeks
Factors explaining the primary outcome
Time Frame: During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks.
Patient characteristics
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks.
Factors explaining the primary outcome
Time Frame: During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Doctor characteristics
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Factors explaining the primary outcome
Time Frame: During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Procedure characteristics
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Factors explaining the primary outcome
Time Frame: During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks
Histology of polyps, correlation between resection margins and biopsies, correlation between optical and histopathological diagnosis
During the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Polypectomy

3
Subscribe