Efficacy of SASI Bypass for Type-2 Diabetic Obese Patients (SASI)

February 9, 2016 updated by: tarek mahdy, Mansoura University

Efficacy of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass for Type-2 Diabetic Obese Patients: Loop Gastric Bipartition, a Novel Metabolic Surgery Procedure.

the investigator modified the Sanator's operation by performing a loop rather than Roux-en-Y bipartition reconstruction and the investigator are reporting the first clinical results of the outcomes of SASI bypass as a mode of functional restrictive and neuroendocrine modulation therapeutic option for obese type 2 diabetes mellituspatients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All patients were subjected to thorough history, clinical examination and laboratory investigations including basic preoperative investigations, lipid profile, thyroid and suprarenal hormonal evaluation. In addition, patients may undergo further assessment for pulmonary functions or gastroesophageal disease including endoscope. . Abdominal ultrasound was done to exclude calcular cholecystitis and to evaluate the degree of fatty liver. Reduction the size of fatty liver was done by putting all patients on low-calorie protein diet for 6 weeks. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis started 12 h before surgery with low molecular weight heparin subcutaneous injections . Preoperative data included age, gender, initial weight, initial body mass index (BMI), obesity comorbidities and treatment medications used (chest problems, diabetes, arterial hypertension and cardiac ischaemia, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, gall stones, urinary stress incontinence, joint pain, depression, infertility and heart burn). Postoperative data included hospital stay, early postoperative complications during the first month (e.g. fever, collection, bleeding, vomiting, leak and port site problems .Long-term complications more than 1 month after surgery (e.g. nausea, vomiting, reflux, stricture, intestinal obstruction , hypoalbuminemia , anemia and calcium or iron or vitamin D , vitamin B12 deficiency and), excess weight loss and BMI were collected.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:Type 2 diabetic obese pateints -

Exclusion Criteria:patients age above 65 or below 18 years old, history of upper laparotomy, unfit for anesthesia or laparoscopy, major psychological instability and drug abuse.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: SASI bypass
sleeve gastrectomy done and gastro-ileum anastomosis 2.5 meter from the ileocecal valve . the anastomosis is less than 3cmm in diameter . the concept to push undigested food early to the ileum to stimulate intestinal hormones secretion to control diabetes .
Other: SASI bypass
he operation was done under general anesthesia. The technique commences with the devascularization of the greater curvature of the stomach with the harmonic scalpel.junction. The stomach is then tubularized over a 36 French calibration tube, with a linear stapler charged with a green cartridge, commencing 6 cm proximal to the pylorus. The ileocecal junction is identified and 250 cm is measured upwards. The selected loop is ascended antecolic without division of the greater omentum, and a stapled isoperistaltic side-to-side to the anterior wall of the antrum of the stomach just cranial 3 cm away from the pylorus with a linear stapler charged with a green cartridge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
excess weight loss
Time Frame: one year
The percent of excess weight loss was calculated as follows: [(preoperative weight-follow up weight)/preoperative excess weight] ×100.
one year
resolution of diabetes
Time Frame: one year
Resolution of diabetes was defined in this study as a fasting plasma glucose level < 110 mg/dL or HbA1C level < 6 % without hypoglycemic medication at 1 year after surgery. whereas improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 25% in the fasting plasma glucose level and of at least 1% in the hemoglobin A1c level with hypoglycemic drug treatment
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mansoura University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • QASMSD5188453

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings