Diffusion-weighted Imaging Magnetic Resonance for Assessing Liver Fibrosis

September 13, 2016 updated by: Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, Mahidol University

Diffusion-weighted Imaging Magnetic Resonance for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Several noninvasive radiological techniques have been investigated for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis among patients with chronic infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a particularly appealing method for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. The aims of this study are to evaluate the accuracy of DW-MRI in patients with chronic viral hepatitis for determining the stage of liver fibrosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Among patients with chronic infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus, evaluation of the stage of liver fibrosis is of major importance for determining prognosis and therapeutic decisions. Liver biopsy is a costly and invasive technique with associated mortality and morbidity. A typical biopsy fragment represents only 1/50,000 of the organ. Several noninvasive radiological techniques have been investigated for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a particularly appealing method for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Because it is easy to implement, non-operator dependent, and process without the need for contrast agents. However, preliminary studies on small numbers of patients in which various hardware and sequencing profiles were used have reported inconsistent results for staging liver fibrosis with DW-MRI. The aims of this study are to evaluate correlation between stage of hepatic fibrosis and liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized liver ADC with spleen assessed by DW-MRI in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B or C. Also, this study aim to evaluate factors that influence liver ADC and normalized liver ADC with spleen value for predicting the stage of liver fibrosis as well as to estimate the optimal cutoff values of DW-MRI for determining significant liver fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥2) and advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥3).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
121

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
    • Bangkok
      • Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All naive patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infection who undergo liver biopsy examination for evaluating candidates for antiviral therapy will be invited to participate into this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other cause of chronic liver disease
  • Contraindication for liver biopsy
  • Contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Diffusion-weighted imaging
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination of liver will be performed on a 3.0T Achieva MR scanner (Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) will be performed using a single-shot echo-planar imaging during a single end expiratory breath-hold. A single observer placed circular regions of interest around 2.30 cm2 to measure mean signal intensity (SI) in the right hepatic lobe and the spleen for each b value, avoiding areas of artifact, vessels, and focal lesions. A monoexponential fit will be performed to calculate liver and spleen apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on the basis of ln(SI) as a function of b value, using all b values. Normalized liver ADC will be calculated as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC.
Device: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI)
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination of liver will be performed on a 3.0T Achieva MR scanner (Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) will be performed using a single-shot echo-planar imaging during a single end expiratory breath-hold. A single observer placed circular regions of interest around 2.30 cm2 to measure mean signal intensity (SI) in the right hepatic lobe and the spleen for each b value, avoiding areas of artifact, vessels, and focal lesions. A monoexponential fit will be performed to calculate liver and spleen apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on the basis of ln(SI) as a function of b value, using all b values. Normalized liver ADC will be calculated as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The correlation coefficient of the stage of hepatic fibrosis and liver apparent diffusion coefficient as assessed by DW-MRI
Time Frame: At enrollment
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate correlation between stage of hepatic fibrosis and liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized liver ADC with spleen assessed by DW-MRI in patients with chronic viral hepatitis B or C.
At enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The optimal cutoff values of DW-MRI for determining the stage of liver fibrosis
Time Frame: At enrollment
The aim of this study is to estimate the optimal cutoff values of DW-MRI for determining significant liver fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥2) and advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stage ≥3).
At enrollment
The effects of hepatic steatosis, necroinflammation and hepatic iron on ADC values for determining the stage of liver fibrosis
Time Frame: At enrollment
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the degree of hepatic steatosis, necroinflammation, and hepatic iron affect the values of liver ADC and normalized liver ADC with spleen for determining the stage of liver fibrosis.
At enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mahidol University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, MD, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Si237/2014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no a plan to make individual participant data available.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings