Detecting Autologous Transfusion by Measuring Alterations in the Dynamics of Red Blood Cell Maturation and Recycling

May 7, 2018 updated by: Daniel Cushman, University of Utah
A total of 40 subjects will be recruited for participation in this study. 20 subjects (10 males and 10 females) will be randomized to the active group (those receiving re-infusion of autologous blood) and 20 subjects (10 males and 10 females) will be randomized to the placebo group (receiving NS infusion).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Autologous blood transfusion is a major problem in a wide range of competitive sports. Methods with increased sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility are needed to identify athletes who cheat in this manner and compromise their health and the integrity of their sports in general. Complete blood counts (CBC) offer routine high-resolution assessment of the current hematologic status of individuals, providing estimates of a number of blood characteristics, such as the total hemoglobin concentration in the blood (HGB) and the volume fraction of cells in the blood (HCT). These CBC components are homeostatically controlled by the carefully regulated dynamic processes of red blood cell (RBC) production in and release from the bone marrow, RBC maturation in the peripheral circulation over the course of the ~100-day RBC lifespan, and clearance and recycling of senescent cells. Any significant perturbation to the circulating population of RBCs, like autologous transfusion, will immediately trigger compensatory modulation of one or more of these dynamic processes. The investigators believe quantification of these underlying dynamic processes will enable us to detect autologous transfusion. These dynamic RBC processes cannot currently be measured directly, but novel mathematical modeling enables their inference from routine complete blood and reticulocyte counts. The investigators propose to test the ability of modeled RBC dynamics to identify instances of autologous blood transfusion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Center for Clinical & Translational Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female between 18-35 years old
  2. Classified as low risk and will not have any major signs or symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease according to the American College of Sports Medicine's (ACSM) risk stratification categories
  3. The subjects should be well-trained endurance athletes. This group could consist of cyclists (road and mountain), triathletes, runners, long-distance swimmers, etc.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 18 or greater than 35 on the day of enrollment
  2. Any contraindication to blood donation as defined by the American Association of Blood Banks http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/QuestionsaboutBlood/UCM272981.pdf
  3. Any chronic illness (e.g.diabetes, heart disease, hypotension, anemia, hemoglobinopathy, marrow diseases, leukemia/lymphoma, pregnancy, amenorrhea/female athlete triad)
  4. Any abnormal CBC index or iron study; any blood dyscrasia
  5. Abnormal blood and urine tests for doping agents (e.g. phthalates)
  6. Positive uhCG or women who are attempting to get pregnant during the study period
  7. Unwilling or unable to provide blood samples or receive a blood transfusion
  8. Not a participant in endurance sports activities
  9. Are currently on any medications that might affect hematologic parameters including, but not restricted to, hematopoietic medications
  10. Subjects with a baseline hemoglobin above 16.7 g/dL, or baseline hematocrit below 35% or above 55%.
  11. Any subject that plans to participate in an organized athletic event (or USA Cycling sanctioned event) within 30 days following the re-infusion phase of the study will not be allowed to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment - Autologous Transfusion
Participants will be randomized to the treatment group (autologous transfusion)
Other: Autologous Transfusion
Participants will receive autologous transfusion on Day 21
Placebo Comparator: Control - Normal Saline (Placebo)
Participants will either be randomized to the control group (saline transfusion)
Other: Control - Normal Saline (Placebo)
Participants will receive saline on Day 21

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematocrit
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This will be used within a mathematical model to define the volume (v) and hemoglobin (h) dynamics of a typical RBC as deterministic functions (f) and random fluctuations in the rates of these changes over time (ζ) (Patel, Patel, & Higgins, 2015).
8 weeks
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This will be used within a mathematical model to define the volume (v) and hemoglobin (h) dynamics of a typical RBC as deterministic functions (f) and random fluctuations in the rates of these changes over time (ζ) (Patel, Patel, & Higgins, 2015).
8 weeks
Reticulocyte count
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This will be used within a mathematical model to define the volume (v) and hemoglobin (h) dynamics of a typical RBC as deterministic functions (f) and random fluctuations in the rates of these changes over time (ζ) (Patel, Patel, & Higgins, 2015).
8 weeks
Mean corpuscular volume
Time Frame: 8 weeks
This will be used within a mathematical model to define the volume (v) and hemoglobin (h) dynamics of a typical RBC as deterministic functions (f) and random fluctuations in the rates of these changes over time (ζ) (Patel, Patel, & Higgins, 2015).
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Utah

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory
Partnership for Clean Competition

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Cushman, M.D., University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 83533

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings