Early Detection of Mucosal Abnormalities in Graft-versus-host Disease (E-mage)

August 28, 2019 updated by: Nantes University Hospital
Gastro-intestinal graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major source of morbidity and mortality amongst allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). The diagnosis is based on histological findings that involve colonic biopsies with a risk of bleeding, especially in case of thrombocytopenia. Moreover the diagnosis is frequently made at a clinical stage of the disease, after the appearance of gastro-intestinal symptoms. Endo-microscopy is a novel endoscopic technique that allow "optical biopsies" during a conventional endoscopy and has proved its efficiency in several indications. In a pilot study the investigators showed that it had good sensibility and sensitivity compared to histology as gold standard. Therefore this study aim to identify endo-microscopic criteria allowing the early diagnosis of GHVD before its clinical manifestations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a mini-invasive alternative technique to perform biopsies in the terminal part of the colon with rectosigmoidoscopy alone. Confocal laser endomicroscopy, either using an endoscope-based or a probe based technology , aims to decrease the number of standard biopsies and their associated risks, by providing real-time in situ microscopy. In a previous pilot study performed in 15 patients at the University hospital of Nantes, the investigators suggested that combining probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) could detect early mucosal abnormalities suggestive of GVHD and thus be part of a mini-invasive algorithm for early detection of GI-GVHD. However, in this study, the investigators showed that pCLE was a sensitive method for the early diagnosis of GVH with a sensibility of 85% and a specificity of 71.5%. These interesting results are however to put in question due to several reasons. First of all the pCLE criteria used to define a GVHD in this study were established with data stemming of literature in other validated indications such as the MIAMI score for the diagnosis of malignant biliary structures and therefore can turn out not to be as relevant as expected. Secondly the interpretations of the images obtained with pCLE were only interpreted by a single endoscopist who by the way wasn't blinded from the macroscopic appearance of eventual lesions during rectosigmoidoscopy resulting in a bias. Thirdly the number of patient as in a pilot study was probably not sufficient to evaluate the real sensibility and sensitivity of those new indication and technique for the early diagnosis of GVH. All together these observations lead us to the necessity of developing the promising results obtained previously and allow their realization by the creation of an innovating pCLE score : the E-mage score. The different criteria of the score will be established after the one defined in the pilot study reviewed by an expert committee combining anatomo-pathologists and endoscopists to be as objective as possible with quantitative and semi-quantitative assessments focusing particularly on crypt architecture, morphologic and dynamic criteria and fluorescein leakage with a cut off standing as no GVHD, likely GVHD or certain GVHD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
19

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CORON Emmanuel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient at risk for GVHD, i.e. undergoing HSCT for hematologic disorder
  • Patient receiving a reduce intensity conditioning
  • Aged 18 years or over
  • Underlying hematologic disorder in complete remission
  • Willing to participate after informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient receiving a myeloablative conditioning regimen
  • Patients receiving allo-HSCT from an haploidentical donor or an umbilical cord blood
  • Patients receiving a second or beyond allo-HSCT
  • Patient with the underlying hematologic disorder in relapse
  • Patients having developed a GVHD before inclusion in the study
  • Patients having developed engraftment syndrome
  • Patients receiving corticosteroid upper 0.5 mg/kg/d
  • Patients with ongoing uncontrolled medical condition
  • Prior history of allergy to fluorescein
  • Renal dysfunction
  • Suspected or documented bowel obstruction
  • Known inflammatory bowel disease
  • History of major abdominal intervention
  • No contraception
  • Breast-feeding or pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Probe based confocal laser endomicroscopy (Cellvizio)
intra-veinous injection of 5 mL of 10% fluorescein diluted in 50 cc of saline serum. The images obtained during the examination will be recorded via the endomicroscopy console.
Device: Probe based confocal laser endomicroscopy (Cellvizio)
The probe is a miniaturized microscope in the form of a fiber which is inserted through the endoscope and brought into contact with the mucosa. It thus allows for a "live virtual biopsy", that is to say, obtaining real-time microscopic virtual image of the mucosa. It requires an intra-veinous injection of 5 mL of 10% fluorescein diluted in 50 cc of saline serum. The images obtained during the examination will be recorded via the endomicroscopy console so that two endoscopists blinded from the macroscopic and histological findings can review the data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
E-mage Score
Time Frame: Once for each patient between day 21 and day 28 after graft
The primary endpoint is the evaluation of E-mage score as a new way to detect the early occurrence of GVH amongst patient undergoing Allo-HSCT, considering its sensibility an sensitivity. The E-mage score will be constructed after an expert committee to define semiquantitative or quantitative criteria allowing the classification of pCLE lesions from no GVH to certain GVH. Those criteria will be set regarding the results of the pilot study. The pCLE images will be interpreted by two endoscopists used to pCLE images and blinded from macroscopic observations. Correlation between the E-mage score calculated for each patient and the gold standard histology will be evaluated and sensibility and specificity of the Emage score will be calculated.
Once for each patient between day 21 and day 28 after graft

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
new early paraclinical markers of GVH and correlation with the occurrence of GVHD
Time Frame: up to 3 month after graft
Identification of intestinal modifications (microbiota, AMP secretion, phenotype of the enteric nervous system cells, immune phenotype ) presented by each participant
up to 3 month after graft
GVHD physiopathology
Time Frame: within one year
Identification of intestinal modifications (microbiota, AMP secretion, phenotype of the enteric nervous system cells, immune phenotype ) presented by each participant
within one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nantes University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Emmanuel Coron, MD-PHD, CHU de Nantes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 3, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC15_0327

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings