Plasma DNA and Vascular Remodelling in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (PADRE)

January 7, 2020 updated by: ADDMEDICA SASA
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between plasma DNA levels and micro- and macro-circulatory vascular remodelling in patients with sickle cell disease

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Ile De France
      • Bobigny, Ile De France, France, 93009
        • Hopital Avicenne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Homozygous SS or Sß0 sickle cell disease patients.
  • Seen in consultation for an annual clinical and para-clinical evaluation of his/her disease.
  • Stable clinical condition of the disease defined as the absence of severe vaso-occlusive crises (requiring hospitalisation or a visit to the emergency unit) in the previous month and absence of transfusion in the previous 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other haemoglobinopathy
  • Known diabetes.
  • Recent administration of an anticoagulant treatment at curative doses (< 48h before inclusion), or platelet-inhibiting drugs (less than 1 week prior to inclusion).
  • Recent transfusion (less than 3 months prior to inclusion).
  • Pregnancy or post-partum (first 40 days after giving birth).
  • Recent consumption of alcohol (less than 10h), coffee (less than 3h), and tobacco (less than 36h) before inclusion.
  • Known infection with hepatitis B, C, and HIV infection.
  • Known cancer or progressive blood disease.
  • Known haemostasis or coagulation disorders.
  • Progressive inflammatory or infectious diseases.
  • Recent history (dating less than 3 months) of venous (pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis) or arterial (acute coronary syndrome, stroke, peripheral arterial ischaemia) thromboembolic event.
  • Adult patients subject to legal protection measures.
  • Patients already involved in a therapeutic protocol.
  • Patients not affiliated to a social security system.

  • Non-inclusion criteria related to the technical requirements of the Endo-PAT:

    • Known cardiac arrhythmia.
    • Severe Raynaud's syndrome.
    • Hand or arm deformity that prevents an EndoPAT analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: sickle cell disease patients
Sickle cell disease patients included in the study and Plasma DNA levels will be analyzed and compared in patients with a reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) < 1.67 (endothelial dysfunction) assessed by Endo-PAT 2000 versus those recorded in patients with a RHI ≥ 1.67 (no endothelial dysfunction).
Procedure: micro- and macro-circulatory vascular remodelling measures not practice in routine care
Vascular measures : reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) assessed by Endo-PAT, central aortic blood pressure, aortic augmentation index, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
Procedure: Biological measures not practice in routine care
Biological measures : Plasma DNA level, NETs (plasma nucleosome levels), Microparticules (MPs) (total, associated with red blood cells, neutrophils, platelets), haem (total and bound to MPs), Myeloperoxydase and elastase activity, neutrophils/DNA, Annexin A5, RNA and TSP1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of plasma DNA levels in patients with a reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) < 1.67 (endothelial dysfunction) assessed by Endo-PAT 2000 versus those recorded in patients with a RHI ≥ 1.67 (no endothelial dysfunction)
Time Frame: 1 days
1 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Relationship between plasma DNA levels and cerebral micro- and macro-angiopathy assessed by CT angiography or MRI angiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Relationship between plasma DNA levels and cardiac damages
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Relationship between plasma DNA levels and pulmonary blood pressure
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Relationship between plasma DNA levels and macrocirculatory vascular measurements
Time Frame: 2 days
2 days
Relationship between plasma DNA levels and nephropathy
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Relationship between plasma DNA levels and a clinical index of the sickle cell disease severity in a stable condition
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ADDMEDICA SASA

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: LE JEUNE Sylvain, MD, Hopital Avicenne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 17, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 7, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DRE-FR-15-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings