Improving Mobility and Cognition in Older Adults Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS)
Improving Mobility and Cognition in Older Adults: Establishment of an Interdisciplinary Clinical Research Program Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Manuel Montero Odasso, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 42369 519-685-4292
- Email: Manuel.MonteroOdasso@sjhc.london.on.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amer Burhan, MBChB, FRCPC
- Phone Number: 47326 519-685-4292
- Email: Amer.Burhan@sjhc.london.on.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada
- Parkwood Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having executive dysfunction (defined as score below 11 out of a possible 13 in the "Montreal Cognitive Assessment -MoCA- executive score index")
- Age 60 years and older
- English speaking
- Able to ambulate 10m independently without any gait aid (eg. walker, cane)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to understand or communicate in English
- Parkinsonism or any neurological disorder with residual motor deficit (eg. Major stroke, epilepsy)
- Musculoskeletal disorder detected by clinical examination which affects gait performance -Active osteoarthritis affecting lower limbs (American College of Rheumatology criteria)
- Severe depression operationalized as Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score>10
TMS specific exclusion criteria:
- Persons with metal anywhere in the head, excluding the mouth, including shrapnel, and screws and clips from surgical procedures
- Persons with cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, electrodes inside the heart
- Unstable heart disease
- Persons with increased intracranial pressure, as in acute large infarctions or trauma
- Previous major stroke, history seizure, Parkinson D, Huntington D.
- History of schizophrenia/schizo-affective disorder, substance use disorder within 1 year of study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: rTMS Active
High frequency pulsed repetitive magnetic stimulation at 100 % resting motor threshold will be delivered using a figure of 8 air film cooled coil attached to the Magstim® Rapid 2 machine.
Resting motor threshold will be determined minimum energy needed to elicit the a reliable visible contraction in the contra-lateral first interosseous muscle using single pulse rTMS applied to the area between C1-C3 using the 10-20 international EEG electrode system.
For stimulation, the coil will be positioned on the scalp corresponding to F4 then F3 electrode position using the 10-20 international EEG system.
Real stimulation will consist of delivering 1200 pulses at 20 hz frequency to F4 location followed by the same stimulation to F3.
The total time needed to deliver pulses is 20 minutes.
|
See Arms description
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: rTMS Sham
Sham stimulation will also involve delivering the same stimulus but with angulation of the coil at 45 degrees, which will give similar scalp sensation but unlikely to deliver magnetic stimulation to the cortex
|
See Arms description
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Gait velocity - cm/s
Time Frame: Seven days
|
Seven days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Executive function, assessed as time to take to complete Trail Making A and B (TMT A and B) in seconds.
Time Frame: seven days
|
seven days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Gait variability which is calculated as coefficient of variation (CoV)
Time Frame: Seven days
|
Seven days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Manuel Montero Odasso, MD,PhD, Lawson Health Research Institute, Western University, St. Joseph's Healthcare
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- Muir SW, Gopaul K, Montero Odasso MM. The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2012 May;41(3):299-308. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs012. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
- Shaw FE, Bond J, Richardson DA, Dawson P, Steen IN, McKeith IG, Kenny RA. Multifactorial intervention after a fall in older people with cognitive impairment and dementia presenting to the accident and emergency department: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003 Jan 11;326(7380):73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7380.73. Erratum In: BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):699.
- Andrews SC, Hoy KE, Enticott PG, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul. 2011 Apr;4(2):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
- Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, Marcolin MA, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Paulus W, Pascual-Leone A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
- Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB, Kuslansky G, Katz MJ, Buschke H. Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer's dementia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1761-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020441.
- Pascual-Leone A, Tarazona F, Keenan J, Tormos JM, Hamilton R, Catala MD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuroplasticity. Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00095-5.
- Miniussi C, Cappa SF, Cohen LG, Floel A, Fregni F, Nitsche MA, Oliveri M, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Priori A, Walsh V. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive neurorehabilitation. Brain Stimul. 2008 Oct;1(4):326-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
- Montero-Odasso M, Verghese J, Beauchet O, Hausdorff JM. Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Nov;60(11):2127-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04209.x. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
- Montero-Odasso M, Hachinski V. Preludes to brain failure: executive dysfunction and gait disturbances. Neurol Sci. 2014 Apr;35(4):601-4. doi: 10.1007/s10072-013-1613-4. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
- Shaw FE. Prevention of falls in older people with dementia. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2007;114(10):1259-64. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0741-5. Epub 2007 Jun 8.
- Oliver D, Connelly JB, Victor CR, Shaw FE, Whitehead A, Genc Y, Vanoli A, Martin FC, Gosney MA. Strategies to prevent falls and fractures in hospitals and care homes and effect of cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2007 Jan 13;334(7584):82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39049.706493.55. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
- Connolly KR, Helmer A, Cristancho MA, Cristancho P, O'Reardon JP. Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice post-FDA approval in the United States: results observed with the first 100 consecutive cases of depression at an academic medical center. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;73(4):e567-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07413.
- Luber B, Kinnunen LH, Rakitin BC, Ellsasser R, Stern Y, Lisanby SH. Facilitation of performance in a working memory task with rTMS stimulation of the precuneus: frequency- and time-dependent effects. Brain Res. 2007 Jan 12;1128(1):120-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
- Barr MS, Farzan F, Rajji TK, Voineskos AN, Blumberger DM, Arenovich T, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. Can repetitive magnetic stimulation improve cognition in schizophrenia? Pilot data from a randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Mar 15;73(6):510-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
- Doruk D, Gray Z, Bravo GL, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Effects of tDCS on executive function in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2014 Oct 17;582:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
- Reis J, Robertson EM, Krakauer JW, Rothwell J, Marshall L, Gerloff C, Wassermann EM, Pascual-Leone A, Hummel F, Celnik PA, Classen J, Floel A, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Siebner HR, Born J, Cohen LG. Consensus: Can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation? Brain Stimul. 2008 Oct;1(4):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
- Elder GJ, Taylor JP. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation: treatments for cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in the neurodegenerative dementias? Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Nov 10;6(9):74. doi: 10.1186/s13195-014-0074-1. eCollection 2014.
- Gersner R, Kravetz E, Feil J, Pell G, Zangen A. Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on markers for neuroplasticity: differential outcomes in anesthetized and awake animals. J Neurosci. 2011 May 18;31(20):7521-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6751-10.2011.
- Li KZ, Roudaia E, Lussier M, Bherer L, Leroux A, McKinley PA. Benefits of cognitive dual-task training on balance performance in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Dec;65(12):1344-52. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq151. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
- Hausdorff JM, Doniger GM, Springer S, Yogev G, Simon ES, Giladi N. A common cognitive profile in elderly fallers and in patients with Parkinson's disease: the prominence of impaired executive function and attention. Exp Aging Res. 2006 Oct-Dec;32(4):411-29. doi: 10.1080/03610730600875817. Erratum In: Exp Aging Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;33(1):121.
- Montero-Odasso M, Oteng-Amoako A, Speechley M, Gopaul K, Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Muir-Hunter SW. The motor signature of mild cognitive impairment: results from the gait and brain study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Nov;69(11):1415-21. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu155. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
- Muir SW, Speechley M, Wells J, Borrie M, Gopaul K, Montero-Odasso M. Gait assessment in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: the effect of dual-task challenges across the cognitive spectrum. Gait Posture. 2012 Jan;35(1):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 107526
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.