The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Metabolism, the Metabolome and Microbiome in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (Microbiome)

April 5, 2022 updated by: Meera Shah, M.B., Ch.B., Mayo Clinic

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Metabolism, the Metabolome and the Microbiome in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

What are the benefits of undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in improving type 2 diabetes outside of weight loss alone?

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery leads to improvements in diabetes that occurs even before any significant weight loss is seen. What are the reasons for this? There is evidence in animals that changes in the composition of gut bacteria after RYGB may be responsible for improvements in how glucose is metabolized in the body. The study aims to correlate changes in the bacterial composition of the gut that occurs after surgery with improvements in glucose metabolism in people with type 2 diabetes. The investigators will do this by using validated methods to measure glucose metabolism and cutting edge technology to analyze the gut microbiome. A parallel group of patients with similar weight, height and age will undergo caloric restriction alone to mimic weight loss seen after RYGB. Participants will also undergo similar glucose metabolism studies and analysis of their gut bacterial composition. Thus, any difference seen between groups can be attributed to the surgery itself and may lead to identification of novel therapeutic options for diabetes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 20-65 years of age.
  • Seen at Mayo Clinic Nutrition Clinic and have received authorization for RYGB surgery.
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus or impaired fasting glucose with BMI >35 AND not interested in surgery but are interested in supervised caloric restriction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with thiazolidinediones.
  • Chronic antibiotic therapy.
  • Active microvascular or macrovascular complications of diabetes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)
Subjects between the ages of 20-65 years of age seen for weight management in the Nutrition Clinic at Mayo Clinic, who have been approved for RYGB.
Procedure: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)
Subjects will be studied prior to surgical intervention and 12 weeks post surgery. Subjects in surgical arm will start diet intervention after surgery. Follow up with dietary will be per standard of care following RYGB surgery.
Other Names:
  • Bariatric Surgery
Sham Comparator: Caloric restriction
Subjects between the ages of 20-65 years of age, with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose. Subjects will undergo caloric restriction alone to mimic weight loss seen after gastric bypass surgery.
Behavioral: Caloric Restriction
Subjects participating in caloric arm of this study will be asked to consume an identical diet that is controlled for caloric content and macronutrient composition. This is identical to that consumed by patient undergoing RYGB. Subjects in the caloric restriction arm will start the diet after the screening visit. Compliance will be monitored by alternating weekly meetings with a clinical psychologist and dietician.
Active Comparator: Exendin-9,39
Four subjects who have undergone RYGB surgery will be studied 4 weeks after surgery. Subjects will be randomized to receive an infusion of Exendin-9,39 or normal saline.
Drug: Exendin-9,39
A subset of 4 subjects who have undergone RYGB surgery will be studied 4 weeks after surgery. Subjects will be randomized to receive an infusion of either Exendin-9,39 or normal saline. Exendin-9,39 blocks the action of specific hormones called "incretins" that are produced by the gut in health and in larger quantities after gastric bypass surgery.
Placebo Comparator: Normal Saline
Four subjects who have undergone RYGB surgery will be studied 4 weeks after surgery. Subjects will be randomized to receive an infusion of Exendin-9,39 or normal saline.
Drug: Normal Saline
subset of 4 subjects who have undergone RYGB surgery will be studied 4 weeks after surgery. Subjects will be randomized to receive an infusion of either Exendin-9,39 or normal saline. Exendin-9,39 blocks the action of specific hormones called "incretins" that are produced by the gut in health and in larger quantities after gastric bypass surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fasting Glucose
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Blood sample taken after an overnight fast.
At baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Fasting Glucose
Time Frame: 4 weeks post intervention
Blood sample taken after an overnight fast.
4 weeks post intervention
Peak Glucose
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Blood sample taken after a meal.
baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Peak Glucose
Time Frame: 4 weeks post intervention
Blood sample taken after a meal.
4 weeks post intervention
Glucose AUC
Time Frame: 0 to 360 minutes post-meal at Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention
Area under the curve calculated from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
0 to 360 minutes post-meal at Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention
Changes in the Gut Microbiome Following RYGB or Caloric Restriction
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Stool sample collection for gut microbiome analysis
baseline and 12 weeks post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Meera Shah, MBChB, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 15-000179

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings