Air Versus Saline Solution for the Localization of the Epidural Space in Labour Analgesia

June 14, 2016 updated by: Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz

Localization of the Epidural Space Using the Loss of Resistance Technique for Labour Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Air Versus Saline Solution

Epidural space localization using loss of resistance technique with air (ALOR) is controversial in obstetric analgesia due to a minor efficacy and risk of complications, compared with loss of resistance technique with saline (SLOR). This randomized prospective study will compare the efficacy and incidence of most common complications of both techniques in obstetric analgesia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A local ethics committee has approved the study. A statistical power calculation was performed and 177 patients per group will be necessary to confirm a 20% difference of efficacy of the block at 30 minutes (α=0,05; β=0,1). Epidural catheter will be inserted and a standardized analgesic protocol will initiate. The efficacy of the block will be assessed after 30 minutes and at delivery. The apparition of adverse effects during puncture and labour will be annotated. The need for repuncture of the block and the repercussion of the technique on the delivery and the fetus will be recorded as well. At 24 hours, investigators will assess the incidence of pain at the site of puncture (PSP) and the level of maternal satisfaction on a 0 to10 numeric scale.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Parturients asking for epidural analgesia during labour .
  • Age between 18 and 45 years.
  • Spontaneous or induced.
  • Cervical dilatation inferior to 6 cm.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Infection in the puncture site.
  • Refusal of the patient.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Severe hypovolaemia.
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Severe aortic or mitral stenosis.
  • Systemic infection.
  • Non collaborating patient.
  • Incapacity of communicating or lack of comprehension of the study by the parturient
  • Prior neurological symptoms or demyelinising lesions.
  • Valvular stenosis.
  • Severe spinal deviation.
  • Patient previously operated of spinal surgery in the site of puncture.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: air in epidural space
When the ALOR epidural localization technique will be used, an intermittent pressure with fast movements will be exerted on the plunger of the syringe while the Tuohy needle will be inserted until loss of resistance was felt.
Procedure: air in epidural space
The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be then withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of air will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.
Experimental: saline in epidural space
When the SLOR technique is used, a continuous pressure will be exerted on the plunger of the Tuohy needle until loss of resistance was felt.
Procedure: saline in epidural space
The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of saline solution will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Analgesia obtained 30 minutes after the puncture of the epidural block (variation of pain score)
Time Frame: 30 min
30 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HULP2914

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings