Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Delayed Implant Placement in the Anterior Region of the Maxilla
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Xin Liu
- Phone Number: +8615902064014
- Email: 838667172@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Baoxin Huang
- Phone Number: +8615820219260
- Email: dentisthbx@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
- Recruiting
- Guanghua School of Stomatology Hospital of Stomatology
-
Contact:
- Xin Liu
- Phone Number: +8615902064014
- Email: 838667172@163.com
-
Contact:
- Baoxin Huang
- Phone Number: +8615820219260
- Email: dentisthbx@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years old and able to understand an informed consent
- Adequate oral hygiene to allow for implant therapy consistent with standards of care.
- Missing a single tooth in the maxillary anterior region
- Presence of adjacent natural teeth
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor oral hygiene
- Severe parafunctional habits, for example, bruxing and clenching
- Presence of clinically active periodontal disease as expressed by probing pocket depths≥4 mm in combination with bleeding on probing.
- Conditions that might lead to a possibly lowered regenerative capacity of the bone, for example, osteoporosis and Paget's disease
- Pregnant or expecting to be pregnant
- History of drug and alcohol abuse
- History of systemic diseases that would contraindicate oral surgical treatment, for example, uncontrolled diabetes (defined as HBA1c level >7%)
- Radiotherapy in the head and neck area,
- On certain medications like bisphosphonates or steroids currently or within the past three months
- Absence of adjacent teeth
- Unwillingness to return for the follow-up examination
- Smokers (more than 20 cigarettes per day). Subjects smoking <20 cigarettes per day were requested to stop smoking before and after surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Type 1 implant placement
Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure
|
Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Type 3 implant placement
Implant is placed in the site which is left to heal for 3 months following tooth extraction
|
Implant is placed in the site which is left to heal for 3 months following tooth extraction
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES)
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Baseline will be at the time of implant placement.Pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES) will be recorded at 0.5, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Radiographic bone volume
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Radiographic bone volume be assessed at pre-operation, 0 ,1.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant survival
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Implant survival will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Probing depth
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Probing depth will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Modified plaque index
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Modified plaque index will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Modified bleeding index
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Modified bleeding index will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Buccal marginal recession
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Buccal marginal recession will be assessed at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Papilla volume
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Papilla volume will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Width of keratinized gingiva
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Width of keratinized gingiva will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
A questionnaire will be recorded at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
|
Oral health impact profile shortened version (OHIP-I)
Time Frame: Up to 10 years after baseline
|
A questionnaire will be recorded at pre-operation, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 10.5 years after implant placement.
|
Up to 10 years after baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Zhuofan Chen, Sun Yat-sen University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rieder D, Eggert J, Krafft T, Weber HP, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM. Impact of placement and restoration timing on single-implant esthetic outcome - a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):e80-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12539. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
- Huynh-Ba G, Meister DJ, Hoders AB, Mealey BL, Mills MP, Oates TW, Cochran DL, Prihoda TJ, McMahan CA. Esthetic, clinical and patient-centered outcomes of immediately placed implants (Type 1) and early placed implants (Type 2): preliminary 3-month results of an ongoing randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):241-52. doi: 10.1111/clr.12577. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- XinL
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.