A Trial of Topical Aloe Vera Gel in Emergency Department Patients Presenting With Simple Traumatic Wounds (ALOE)

February 15, 2017 updated by: NHS Lothian

A Parallel Group Double Blind Placebo Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of Topical Aloe Vera Gel in Emergency Department (ED) Patients Presenting With Simple Traumatic Wounds

This is a double blind placebo-controlled RCT comparing the speed of healing of simple traumatic wounds with Aloe Vera gel compared to both control (Ultrasound gel) and standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Simple traumatic wounds are a common presenting symptom to the ED affecting thousands of patients worldwide every day. Aloe Vera is a natural product that has been linked to better healing both anecdotally and in animal studies. A recent Cochrane review failed to find any human studies on acute wounds such as those seen in the ED. The aim of this study is to see whether Aloe Vera gel improves the wound healing time in these patients. We plan to enrol 270 participants presenting to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh ED with simple traumatic wounds into a randomised controlled trial. Participants will be assessed at baseline using the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool. They will be then be randomized to one of three groups, and allocated to receive either Aloe Vera gel, control (Ultrasound gel) or standard care. The participants in the two gel groups will have identical packaging and the treating clinician will be unaware as to which group they are allocated. They will be asked to place the allocated substance onto the wound twice daily and cover with a supplied dressing on each occasion for 1 week. All groups will be asked to return to the ED for a repeat Bates-Jensen wound assessment, and will also be asked to record the number of days that their wound took to heal. The gel groups will have assessment of product usage. Participants will also be telephoned at 3 weeks. Primary outcome will be number of days for wound to heal. Secondary outcome will be change in Bates-Jensen wound assessment score between baseline and day 10, change in wound size between baseline and day 10 and baseline and day 21, changes in wound characteristics at day 21 as reported by participants, wound infection rate, participant satisfaction and participant compliance with treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Midlothian
      • Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
        • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients deemed by their treating clinician to have a simple traumatic wound will be considered for enrolment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known allergy to either Aloe Vera or ultrasound gel
  2. Patients under 16 year of age
  3. No telephone number for follow-up
  4. Patient lacking capacity
  5. Patient currently using antibiotics
  6. Patient having a puncture or bite wound
  7. Patient having underlying tendon or bone involvement or wound overlying a joint
  8. Patients with burn wounds
  9. Wounds more than 24 hours old
  10. Patient unable/unwilling to attend follow-up
  11. Patients unable to self administer treatment.
  12. Wound that treating clinician would not routinely dress e.g. facial wounds (face, ear, eyebrow, nose, lip, eyelid, scalp), mucosa and hair covered areas, or wounds that require specialist dressing
  13. Self reported pregnancy
  14. Patients with a known allergy to the study dressing
  15. Patients currently recruited in another clinical trial
  16. Patients already recruited in the ALOE Study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Standard care
Experimental: Aloe Vera Gel
Experimental gel placed in identical opaque tube as placebo gel.
Drug: Aloe Vera Gel
The participant will be asked to place the allocated substance onto the wound twice daily and cover with a supplied dressing on each occasion for 1 week.
Other Names:
  • Aloe Vera Gel (LIFEPLAN)
Placebo Comparator: Ultrasound Gel
Placebo placed in identical opaque tube as experimental gel.
Other: Ultrasound gel
The participant will be asked to place the allocated substance onto the wound twice daily and cover with a supplied dressing on each occasion for 1 week.
Other Names:
  • Sterile (AQUASONIC 100) ultrasound transmission gel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of days for wound to heal (defined as epithelial closure without discharge or scab formation)
Time Frame: Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Day 21 (+/- 2 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Numerical change in Bates-Jensen wound assessment score between baseline and day 10 (+/- 2 days)
Time Frame: Baseline and day 10 (+/- 2 days)
Baseline and day 10 (+/- 2 days)
Size (width and height in mm) of wound at baseline, day 10 (+/- 2 days), and day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Time Frame: Baseline, day 10 (+/- 2 days) and day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Baseline, day 10 (+/- 2 days) and day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Characteristics (visibility of wound edges and leakage from wound) as reported by participant at day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Time Frame: Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Wound infection rate
Time Frame: Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Participant satisfaction score
Time Frame: Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Day 21 (+/- 2 days)
Participant treatment compliance (i.e. the total weight of gel used)
Time Frame: Day 10 (+/- 2 days)
Day 10 (+/- 2 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NHS Lothian

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Edinburgh

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Matthew J Reed, MA FRCEM MD, NHS Lothian

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AC16063

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings