A Clinical Trial Using Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Liver Cancers

July 2, 2020 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

A Prospective Clinical Trial Using Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Liver Cancers

Liver cancer including primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic liver cancers is one the most common malignancies in the world. Over 10000 new cases per year are diagnosed in Taiwan. Despite the many treatment options, the prognosis of HCC remains dismal. More than 8000 people died of this cancer every year in Taiwan. A majority (70% to 85%) of patients present with advanced or unresectable disease. In contrast, small liver cancers can be cured with an appreciable frequency. Five-year disease-free survival exceeding 50% has been reported for surgical resection, and for the inoperable patients who do not have vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is recommended as an alternative curative therapy. However, the main drawback of RFA is its limitation to tumor size and location. The tumors larger than 5 cm in diameter or located adjacent to vessels, could not be ablated completely sometimes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Irreversible electroporation (IRE), developed and manufactured by AngioDynamics US Ltd, can ablate tumor by fenestrating the cancer cell membrane by electric pulse. The anti-tumor effect does not result from thermotherapy, so is also not diminished by adjacent vessels. Several pre-clinical studies have already demonstrated IRE is a safe and effective treatment for live cancers. The system has been approved as safe by the European Union (EU) in 2008 and received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010. However, there are still few experiences in using IRE for tumor ablation in Taiwan. In this study, the investigators will perform IRE for 40 inoperable patients with liver cancers adjacent to vessels who are suitable to receive radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the investigators hospital. The investigators will evaluate the potential side effect and ablate effect of tumors by abdominal computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the investigators will also follow-up this patients for 2 years to evaluate the overall survival and local recurrence rate. The investigators will appraisal the clinical feasibility and advantage of the system by this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for this study:

  1. The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastatic liver cancers with pathologic proven, and the diagnosis of HCC will be made by pathology / cytology or according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) (2010) diagnostic criteria. In brief, Nodules larger than 1 cm found on ultrasound screening of a cirrhotic liver should be investigated further with either tri-phase multidetector computed tomography (CT) scan or dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If the appearances are typical of HCC (i.e., hypervascular in the arterial phase with washout in the portal venous or delayed phase), the lesion should be treated as HCC. If the findings are not characteristic or the vascular profile is not typical, a second contrast enhanced study with the other imaging modality should be performed, or the lesion should be biopsied. Biopsies of small lesions should be evaluated by expert pathologists. Tissue that is not clearly HCC should be stained with all the available markers including cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), and glutamine synthetase to improve diagnostic accuracy.
  2. Unsuitable for surgical resection but local ablation is indicated, however, the distance between tumour and vessels is smaller than 5 mm.
  3. Have at least one, but less than or equal to 3 tumors,
  4. Each tumor must be ≤ 5 cm in diameter,
  5. Child-Pugh class A-B,
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-1,
  7. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ 3,
  8. Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Platelet count ≥ 100 K/Μl. Total bilirubin ≦ 2 mg/dL. alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) < 5 x upper limit of normal. prothrombin time (PT)- international normalized ratio (INR) ≦ 2.0. Serum creatinine ≦ 1.5 x upper limit of normal
  9. Prior Informed Consent Form
  10. Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  11. The disease status is not suitable to receive surgical resection, percutaneous alcohol injection, transarterial chemoembolization or other standard treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients presenting with any of the following will not be enrolled into this study:

1. History of cardiac disease:

  1. Congestive heart failure >New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2
  2. Active coronary artery disease (CAD) (myocardial infarction more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed)
  3. Cardiac arrhythmias (>Grade 2 NCI-CTCAE Version 3.0) which are poorly controlled with anti-arrhythmic therapy or requiring pace maker
  4. Uncontrolled hypertension 2. Any active metal implanted device (eg Pacemaker), 3. Women who are pregnant or women of child-bearing potential who are not using an acceptable method of contraception, 4. Received treatment with an investigational agent/ procedure within 30 days prior to treatment with the IRE System, 5. Known history of HIV infection 6. Concurrent extrahepatic cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: irreversible electroporation (IRE)
irreversible electroporation (IRE) (AngioDynamics, NY) To use 2 to 6 unipolar electrodes of IRE in a predetermined grid pattern. 90 pulses of 2,000 - 3,000 V were applied with a pulse generator (AngioDynamics, NY) across the gap between the electrodes for 100 microseconds (0.1 msec) per each ablation.
Device: Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor response
Time Frame: 1 month after treatment
Tumor response, according to modified RECIST criteria, will be evaluated by abdominal computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 month after treatment.
1 month after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) evaluation
Time Frame: one to two years
Complete an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) evaluation
one to two years
Change of vital signs
Time Frame: one to two years
Measure vital signs including temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and heart rate.
one to two years
Physical examination
Time Frame: one to two years
Conduct a physical examination.
one to two years
Clinical laboratory assessments
Time Frame: one to two years
Collect blood samples for Clinical laboratory assessments, including hematology, A-fetoprotein (AFP) (for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)) / carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (for adenocarcinoma) and chemistry evaluations.
one to two years
Urinalysis
Time Frame: one to two years
Collect urine sample for a routine urinalysis.
one to two years
Conduct CT or MR scans for tumour response evaluation
Time Frame: one to two years
Subjects will still be followed-up in the event of disease progression in order to document local recurrence, a secondary endpoint.
one to two years
Review concomitant medications
Time Frame: one to two years
Use of medications will be reviewed and recorded.
one to two years
Assess for presence of adverse events
Time Frame: one to two years
An adverse event assessment will be performed.
one to two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 18, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201210007DIC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings