Stepping Up 4 Your Child (4yourchild)
Stepping Up 4 Your Child: The Impact of an Educational Program and Social Case Work Involvement on Single Fathers
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kentucky
-
Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States, 42701
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40292
- University of Louisville
-
Owensboro, Kentucky, United States, 42302
-
Owenton, Kentucky, United States, 40359
-
Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42003
-
Sandy Hook, Kentucky, United States, 41171
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- non-custodial father AND
- age 16-24 OR
- age 24 up + low income OR
- age 24 up + child support payment delinquent
Exclusion Criteria:
- female
- custodial father
- male but not a father
- younger than age 16
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 4 Your Child Program
Program integrates the provision of responsible parenting, economic stability, and relationship education services to fathers at risk for paternal disengagement.
|
Integrates the provision of responsible parenting, economic stability, and relationship education services to fathers at risk for paternal disengagement.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: 4 Your Child + Case Management
Participants assigned to treatment group that includes case management will receive an initial assessment to determine their strengths and needs.
The participant will then work collaboratively with their case manager to connect to community resources to meet his needs.
To do so, the case manager will meet with the participant using the following schedule: Months 1-2: intervention in the form of weekly face-to-face meeting with a case manager, plus a weekly phone call from a case manager; Months 3-4: intervention in the form of face-to-face meeting every other week, plus a weekly phone call; Months 5-6: intervention in the form of face-to-face meeting once a month, plus a weekly phone call.
|
Integrates the provision of responsible parenting, economic stability, and relationship education services to fathers at risk for paternal disengagement.
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Waiting list control
Individuals who are randomly assigned to this condition will receive no treatment for a period of months in parallel with the experimental intervention conditions.
Data will be gathered from them, and they will be randomly assigned to a treatment condition when possible.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fathering Knowledge and Skills.
Time Frame: immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
Fathering knowledge and skills will be measured using the 24/7 Dad Fathering Skills Survey (National Fatherhood Initiative, 2010).
This survey has 25 items that are multiple choice response questions.
This survey comes with the 24/7 Dad curriculum packet.
Given that this survey is a measure of fathering knowledge and not a standardized scale, no reliability data are available.
|
immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
|
Change in Fathers' Parenting Behavior.
Time Frame: immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
Fathers' reported parenting behavior will be measured using the Index of Father Involvement (Hawkins et al., 2002).
This measure has 9 factors loaded as subscales designed to tap direct and indirect forms of involvement and a total of 26 items.
All items are measured on a 5 point scale ranging from A (excellent) to F (failing).
The measure has a reported reliability/internal consistency score of .69
|
immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
|
Change in Child Support Compliance.
Time Frame: immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
These payment data will be obtained via reports from the Kentucky Office of Child Support Enforcement.
|
immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
|
Change in Co-Parenting Relationship Quality.
Time Frame: immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
Co-Parenting Relationship Quality.
Co-parenting relationship quality will be measured using the Co-parenting Questionnaire (CQ, Margolis, Gordis, & John, 2001).
This measure is a 14-item self-report instrument examining: 1) the amount of conflict between parents surrounding parenting issues, 2) cooperation as the extent to which mothers and fathers support, value, and respect each other as parents and the degree to which they ease one another's parenting burden, and 3) triangulation, the extent to which parents distort parent-child boundaries by attempting to form a coalition with the child that undermines or excludes the other parent.
The 14 items form a three factor structure and have good internal consistency with alphas for the 3 factors and the total scale ranging from .69 to .87.
|
immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Conflict Resolution Skills.
Time Frame: immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
The Stanley-Markman Relationship Dynamics Scale (Renick et al, 1992) will be used to measure conflict resolution skills.
This measure has reported Chronbach's alpha levels of .73 and .81
(Stanley et al, 2006) and strong predictive validity for relationship failure.
|
immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
|
Change in Communication Skills.
Time Frame: immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
Communication skills will be measured through the Communication Patterns Questionnaire to assess communication skills.
This measure has strong discriminant validity and Chronbach's alpha levels ranging from .73 to .88 (Noller & White, 1990).
|
immediate after intervention, at 3 months later and at 6 months later
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15.1258
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.