Erythropoietin for Management of Anemia Caused by Chemotherapy

February 19, 2020 updated by: Ho Sup Lee, Kosin University Gospel Hospital

A Phase Ⅱ Study of Erythropoietin for Management of Anemia Caused by Chemotherapy in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

This is a phase Ⅱ study of erythropoietin for management of anemia caused by chemotherapy in patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. The investigators want to investigate hematopoietic response of darbepoietin alfa and the quality of life assessment of increasement of hemoglobin.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Darbepoietin alfa may cause the body to make more red blood cells. They are used to treat anemia caused by chemotherapy in patients with malignant lymphoma. Darbepoietin will be applied to R-CHOP(Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine, Prednisolone) chemotherapy every 21days ± 2days with fixed 360㎍. It will be applied to chemotherapy until increment of hemoglobin 12.0g/dL. If the hemoglobin level exceeds 12.0g/dL, administration of darbepoietin will be temporarily stopped.

And, the questionnaire of the quality of life will be conducted at the baseline, after 2th darbepoietin alfa administration, at study completion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP(Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine, Prednisolone) chemotherapy
  2. hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dL are shown at least 3 cycles after starting R-CHOP(Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine, Prednisolone)
  3. Currently receiving or planning to receive at least 4 times of darbepoetin
  4. Age > 18 years
  5. ECOG(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2
  6. Bilirubin < 2 times upper limit of normal
  7. ALT(alanine aminotransferase) or AST(aspartate aminotransferase) < 5 times upper limit of normal
  8. Creatinine < 2 times upper limit of normal
  9. HIV negative
  10. Ferritin > 20 mcg/L (i.e., not obviously iron deficient)
  11. Can read Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scales for Anemia
  12. Agree with informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Received radiation therapy at least 4 weeks before starting chemotherapy
  2. serious pre-existing medical condition (e.g., cardiac failure [New York Heart Association Class III or IV, or left ventricular ejection fraction <50%], active peptic ulceration, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease)
  3. uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 100 mm Hg, despite medical therapy
  4. arrhythmia NCI CTCAE grade ≥ 2
  5. History of previously treated seizures allowed provided the patient has been seizure-free for a minimum of 3 months
  6. active systemic infection requiring treatment, a known diagnosis of human HIV, or active hepatitis B (hepatitis B carriers were permitted)Malignancy was treated surgically or with local radiation therapy with curative intent and the patient has been disease free for > 3 years
  7. known hypersensitivity to darbepoetin alfa
  8. pregnant or nursing and Negative pregnancy test
  9. previous diagnosis of another malignancy with radiographic or biochemical evidence of residual disease (except completely resected basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or an in-situ malignancy)
  10. combined iron deficiency anemia
  11. received erythropoietin at least one months before starting darbepoetin
  12. considered autologous stem cell transplantation before finish 6 cycles of chemotherapy
  13. untreated primary or metastatic CNS(central nervous system) malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Darbepoietin alfa
Hemoglobin level will be checked at every cycle's day 0 or 1(1cycle is 21days) after starting Darbepoietin alfa. It will be applied to chemotherapy until increment of hemoglobin 12.0 g/dL.
Drug: Darbepoetin alfa
Darbepoietin alfa will be administered subcutaneously at a fixed dose of 360㎍. If it is impossible, administration by intravenous infusion is okay.
Other Names:
  • Nesp
Drug: R-CHOP
R-CHOP regimen is a practical procedure in patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Darbepoietin alfa will be administered to these patients.
Other Names:
  • Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine, Prednisolone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematopoietic response
Time Frame: hemoglobin level of day 21 after Darbepoietin alfa administration
Hemoglobin level after Darbepoietin alfa administration
hemoglobin level of day 21 after Darbepoietin alfa administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scales for anemia
Time Frame: at baseline, Day 21 after 2th darbepoietin alfa administration, Day 21 after last darbepoietin alfa administration
at baseline, Day 21 after 2th darbepoietin alfa administration, Day 21 after last darbepoietin alfa administration
Adverse events as measured by CTCAE v3.0
Time Frame: From the date of first drug administration to the date of the 30th days of last drug administration.
From the date of first drug administration to the date of the 30th days of last drug administration.
Proportion of patients requiring red blood cell transfusions
Time Frame: From the date of first darbepoietin alfa administration to day 21 after last darbepoietin alfa administration
From the date of first darbepoietin alfa administration to day 21 after last darbepoietin alfa administration
Mean time to response of hemoglobin
Time Frame: From the date of first darbepoietin alfa administration to day 21 after last darbepoietin alfa administration
From the date of first darbepoietin alfa administration to day 21 after last darbepoietin alfa administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kosin University Gospel Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 7, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EPOMA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings