Clinical Value of Heart Rate Variability Indexes to Predict Outcomes After Exercise Training in Chronic Heart Failure (REINCA)

September 12, 2016 updated by: Roberto Ricca-Mallada, Universidad de la Republica
Controlled exercise training is a valuable therapeutic addition to pharmacological treatment in most patients with chronic heart failure, reducing long-term mortality, preventing cardiac remodeling and improving functional capacity. Despite the mechanism underlying its benefits might be multifactorial, a sustained improvement in autonomic balance is usually attributed as a major effect. Nevertheless, not all eligible subjects show the same response to exercise, probably due to several differences in the subpopulations enrolled. The investigators hypothesize that some Heart Rate Variability indexes could be valid tools to optimize the selection and follow-up of chronic heart failure patients to training

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Forty subjects followed in a University Heart Failure Management Program were prospectively included. All patients were evaluated before the randomization and after 24 weeks from enrollment. The investigators performed a detailed anamnesis and complete physical examination, Doppler echocardiography, Stress Testing, 6-minute walk test, heart rate variability analysis, and quality of life test. Patients were randomized either to a training group: performing a supervised training program, or a control group receiving usual care. All patients received an optimal pharmacologic treatment including diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-adrenergic blocking agents. All patients included in the training group attended a supervised program 3-days/week during 24 weeks (68-74 sessions). Physical aerobic training appears to impart beneficial changes in autonomic control of patients with chronic heart failure through both parasympathetic and sympathetic control of hear rate. These effects produce changes in several Heart Rate Variability indices as HF and rMSSD related with parasympathetic tone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subjects followed in a University Heart Failure Management Program
  • maintained sinus rhythm
  • New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA) I to III and
  • LVEF≤40% documented by echocardiogram
  • optimal pharmacologic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of stroke, myocardial infarction or extended anterior myocardial scar
  • revascularization procedures or recurrent angina within previous 3 months
  • orthopedic impairment
  • alcohol or drug abuse;
  • implant of pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD);
  • frequently ventricular dysrhythmias,
  • atrial flutter or fibrillation
  • insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;
  • severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or renal dysfunction
  • comorbid non-cardiac disease limiting short term survival
  • previous enrollment in an ET program
  • subjects at great propensity for noncompliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Usual Care
usual care and no changes in their previous physical activity
Active Comparator: Cardiac Rehabilitation
Exercise Training program on a 3-days/week basis during 24 weeks (68-74 sessions). Each session started with a 10-min warm-up walking period followed by 20-min of breathing exercises and free non-resistance movements of limbs. This stage was followed by pedaling during 20-minutes at a circuit resistance training protocol using a stationary cycle-ergometer. Each session ended with a cool down period (5-minutes) including diverse stretching maneuvers of engaged muscle groups. The initial bicycle-ergometer workload (WL) was defined as 50% of the maximum achieved in the previous stress testing
Behavioral: Cardiac Rehabilitation
All patients included in this group attended a supervised exercise training program. A cardiologist supervised the hole training sessions. Blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and body weight were measured in each session. The modified Borg scale was used to measure the perceived exercise intensity
Other Names:
  • Exercise training
  • Educational approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Events
Time Frame: 6 month
Change in New York Heart Association Functional Class; Number of hospitalizations 6 months before and after the date of enrollment; temporary or permanent withdrawal from the study protocol (due to persistent atrial or ventricular arrhythmias; worsening of congestive heart failure symptoms; myocardial infarction; unstable angina; need of cardiac interventions: pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, coronary revascularization or cardiac transplantation; stroke or transient ischemic attack; severe peripheral intermittent claudication or death observed during training or follow-up sessions
6 month
Mean heart rate
Time Frame: 6 month
the mean value of the12-min Electrocardiogram-recordings was considered the resting heart rate (beats per minute)
6 month
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 6 month
walking along a 20-meter long corridor at their own pace, with the aim of covering as much ground as possible in 6 minutes. The distance walked was expressed in meter
6 month
left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: one year
The area-length method was measured to obtain biplane left ventricle volumes. Left Ventricle ejection fraction was derived from the standard equation (%)
one year
quality of life
Time Frame: 6 month
All the subjects completed the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), available in its Spanish version, for measuring physical and mental quality of life
6 month
Stress Test
Time Frame: 6 month
symptom limited exercise testing, measured in metabolic unit (MET)
6 month
square root of the mean squared successive differences of R-R intervals (rMSSD)
Time Frame: 6 month
short-term continuous electrocardiographic recordings were performed for heart rate variability analysis. In the time domain, the square root of the mean squared successive differences of R-R intervals (rMSSD) were calculated. Units: ms
6 month
Heart rate power high-frequency (HF)
Time Frame: 6 month
The high-frequency (HF), from 0.15 to 0.40 Hz of the power spectral analysis were calculated. Units: ms2/Hz
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad de la Republica

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Roberto Ricca-Mallada, MD MSc, Hospital de Clínicas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CARDIAC REHABILITATION HF

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings