IPG Replacement Study (PREFERENCE-H) (PREFERENCE-H)
Prospective Evaluation Comparing the Effects of Constant Current Versus Constant Voltage in Deep Brain Stimulation Using Hybrid Systems
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Gera, Germany
- Praxis Dr. Oehlwein
-
Halsbrücke, Germany
- Klinik am Tharandter Wald
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
-
-
-
-
-
Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
- Ospedale Generale Regionale F. Miulli
-
Mestre, Italy
- Ospedale dell'Angelo
-
Milano, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
-
Pavia, Italy
- Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale C. Mondino
-
Roma, Italy
- Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli
-
Udine, Italy
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S Maria della Misericordia
-
-
Cona
-
Ferrara, Cona, Italy, 44124
- Az.Osp. Universitaria Ferrara
-
-
Veneto
-
Padua, Veneto, Italy
- Fondazione "Ospedale San Camillo" I.R.C.C.S
-
-
-
-
Florida
-
Kendall, Florida, United States, 33176
- Baptist Hospital of Miami
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
- Neuroscience Consultants
-
-
New York
-
Albany, New York, United States, 12208
- Albany Medical College at Albany Medical Ctr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject (and caregiver, if applicable) signed the approved Informed Consent;
- Subject is ≥ 18 and ≤ 74 years of age;
- Subject is bilaterally treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) using a constant voltage device (i.e. Soletra™, Itrel™, Kinetra™, ActivaPC™ or ActivaRC™ IPG) and is responding satisfactory to CV stimulation in the Investigator's opinion;
- In the physician's opinion, the subject is a suitable candidate for an IPG replacement with different stimulation paradigm;
- Subject needs and/or requests an IPG replacement within 12 months after consent and the current IPG has at least 2.6 V output left (i.e. approx. 30% of full battery capacity) at the time of subject enrollment;
- PD symptom onset is no longer than 20 years;
- Subject has a Hoehn & Yahr score <IV (on stim);
- Subject with a normal cognitive function (MMSE ≥25);
- Subject is fluent speaker (as judged by the investigator) of the language spoken in the country where the investigational site is located.
Exclusion Criteria:
- IPG battery has less than 30% battery life at the time of consent;
- Need to replace or reposition the leads or extensions during the IPG replacement procedure;
- Subject had >10 recurrent falls experienced in the 3 months prior to consent;
- Subject is unwilling to change to either a St Jude Medical Infinity™ or Brio™ DBS system for the IPG replacement;
- Subject is unable to attend the study visits.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system
Subjects will be implanted with SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system
|
Implanted Medtronic® IPG will be explanted and replaced by a SJM Infinity™ DBS IPG or a SJM Brio™ DBS IPG system
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Percentage of Subjects Who Indicate Preference on Constant Current Over Constant Voltage at the 3 Month Follow-up Visit.
Time Frame: 3 Months
|
Proportion of subjects who preferred constant current device over constant voltage, tested against a performance goal (PG) of 50.0% at the 3-month follow-up visit.
|
3 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Events Per Patient-year of Follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months after IPG replacement
|
Total number of safety events related to battery replacement surgical procedures for hybrid systems divided by total follow-up duration from IPG replacement visit to either 12M visit or withdrawal visit (patient-years).
|
12 months after IPG replacement
|
|
Incidence Rate
Time Frame: 12 months after IPG replacement
|
Number of subjects who underwent IPG replacement and encountered safety events related to battery replacement surgical procedure for hybrid system divided by total subjects who underwent IPG replacement.
|
12 months after IPG replacement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Edward Karst, Abbott
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SJM-CIP-10135
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.