Non-invasive Estimation of Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Healthy Subjects by Electrical Impedance Tomography (PAP-EIT)

February 1, 2017 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Prospective Proof-of-concept Study Non-invasive Estimation of Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Healthy Subjects by Electrical Impedance Tomography

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a condition characterized by a sustained elevation in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) above 25 mmHg assessed by right heart catheterization. PH is fatal in absence of adequate treatment or therapy, as the condition progressively increases the workload of the right heart and ultimately leads to its failure. With a minimal indicative prevalence of 1 case/300, PH affects at least 25'000 people in Switzerland alone. After initiation of PH therapy, the follow-up of the patient's health status is often limited to punctual PAP measurements at the clinic at intervals of several months. The lack of more frequent measurements of the patient's PAP strongly hinders the identification of short-term trends in pulmonary hemodynamics, and therefore the anticipation of worsening conditions or treatment inefficiency. As possible solutions, wireless implantable hemodynamic monitors such as the CardioMEMSTM HF System (CardioMEMS Inc., Atlanta, USA) have recently been introduced for the continuous monitoring of PAP in patients with PH. The benefits of frequent measurements over intermittent clinic visits have been demonstrated in several previous studies, notably in terms of prediction of therapy outcomes, anticipation of worsening heart failure, feedback rapidity during therapy, or decline in hospitalization rates. Nevertheless, despite the undeniable advantages that implantable monitors offer to the patient, they remain highly invasive solutions. In contrast, noninvasive alternatives for the measurement of PAP exist, such as transthoracic echocardiography, but are impractical for frequent PAP assessments due to their dependency on qualified personnel to perform the measurement. An optimal PAP monitoring modality for patients with PH should be non-invasive (free of any risks or complications associated with cardiac catheterization) and unsupervised (able to operate without supervision of a medical doctor). Such a modality does not currently exist. In the present study, the investigators propose and investigate the potential of a novel non-invasive, continuous and unsupervised PAP monitoring approach based on the pulse wave velocity (PWV) principle and the use of electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy subjects ≥ 18 years old

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects ≥ 18 years old, BMI < 30 kg/m2
  • Good understanding of written and oral German
  • Willing to provide a signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pace-maker/ ICD
  • Chronic heart diseases
  • Chronic pulmonary diseases
  • Congenital heart/pulmonary diseases
  • Instable angina pectoris
  • Active alcohol or drug abuse
  • Pregnancy or lactation (women of childbearing age will be asked to performed urinary pregnancy test before the screening phase)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation coefficients
Time Frame: Single visit 2 hours
Assessment of significant subject-wise correlation coefficients between the reference PAP, obtained by the gold Standard transthoracic echocardiography technique, and an EIT-derived PAP-related parameter. The primary outcome is therefore the demonstration of the feasibility of monitoring changes in PAP (intra-subject trending ability) by EIT.
Single visit 2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Stefano Rimoldi, Prof, University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016-00747

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings