Breath Synchronized Abdominal Muscle Stimulation to Facilitate Ventilator Weaning: a Pilot Study

October 11, 2021 updated by: Liberate Medical

Breath Synchronized Abdominal Muscle Stimulation to Facilitate Ventilator Weaning: a Pilot

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with exhalation can increase the strength of the respiratory muscles in prolonged mechanical ventilation patients.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the U.S. over 500,000 patients have difficulty weaning from mechanical ventilation every year. These patients cost the health care system $16 billion annually and have an increased risk of medical complications and morbidity.

A major factor responsible for weaning failure is the imbalance between decreased respiratory muscle strength and excessive respiratory load. This study includes an investigational device that applies electrical stimulation to the abdominal muscles in synchrony with exhalation. This is hypothesized to improve the strength of the respiratory muscles. The long term goal of this project is to determine whether this approach can reduce the number of days taken for patients to wean from mechanical ventilation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40204
        • Kindred Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have been mechanically ventilated for at least fourteen days.
  • Clinically stable: oxygen saturation > 90% with a fractional inspired oxygen ≤ 0.40, external positive end expiratory pressure ≤ 5 centimeters water, temperature ranging from 35.5 to 38.5 degrees celsius, no intravenous administration of vasoactive agents.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in whom Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) does not elicit a palpable contraction of the abdominal muscles.
  • Patients with broken or irritated skin on the abdominal wall
  • Patients with a history of neuromuscular disease
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2
  • Patients who are not medically stable
  • Patients with a pacemaker
  • Female patients who are pregnant
  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Patients who are expected to die within four weeks
  • Patients who are unable to follow verbal instructions
  • Patients with epilepsy
  • Patients with an abdominal wall hernia
  • Patients with anoxic encephalopathy
  • Patients with history of, or active, substance abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VentFree Stimulation
Breath synchronized abdominal NMES
VentFree prototype (VF03) that delivers electrical stimulation pulses to the abdominal muscles during exhalation with a frequency of 30 Hz, a pulse width of 350 µs and 90% of the maximum current that the participant can tolerate. These stimulation parameters were selected to cause a tetanic (continuous) contraction of the abdominal muscles, without pain for the patient. Stimulation will be administered for 30 minutes 2 times per day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks; or until the patient is weaned from mechanical ventilation.
Other Names:
  • VentFree
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation
Sham breath synchronized abdominal NMES
Modified VentFree prototype (VF03) that delivers stimulation pulses to the abdominal muscles during exhalation with a frequency of 10 Hz, a pulse width of 100 µs and current set to 10 milliamp. These stimulation parameters were chosen to cause a twitch contraction of the abdominal wall muscles. Stimulation will be administered for 30 minutes, 2 times per day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks; or until the patient is weaned from mechanical ventilation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Maximum Expiratory Pressure From Baseline to Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Maximum expiratory pressure was measured from total lung capacity
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure From Baseline to Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Maximum inspiratory pressure was measured from end expiratory lung volume.
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Thickness of the Transverse Abdominis Muscle From Baseline to Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of transverse abdominis muscle as measured by ultrasound
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Thickness of the External Oblique Muscle From Baseline to Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of the external oblique muscle as measured by ultrasound
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Thickness of the Internal Oblique Muscle From Baseline to Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of the internal oblique muscle as measured by ultrasound
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle as measured by ultrasound
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of the Diaphragm
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Thickness of the diaphragm as measured by ultrasound
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Weaning Success
Time Frame: The earlier of 6 weeks or first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Defined as free from ventilator support for more than 72 hours
The earlier of 6 weeks or first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Number of Days Taken to Wean
Time Frame: The earlier of 6 weeks or first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
The earlier of 6 weeks or first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Cough Peak Flow From Baseline to Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Cough peak flow was measured from total lung capacity
Change from baseline to first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Spontaneous Tidal Volume From Baseline to Final Visit or First Extubation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to final study visit or first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change from baseline to final study visit or first extubation, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Spontaneous Respiratory Rate From Baseline to Final Study Visit
Time Frame: Change from baseline to final study visit, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change from baseline to final study visit, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change in Spontaneous Minute Ventilation From Baseline to Final Study Visit
Time Frame: Change from baseline to final study visit, an expected average of 4 weeks
Change from baseline to final study visit, an expected average of 4 weeks
Maximum Sensation of Stimulation Experienced by Patient
Time Frame: Through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks
Measured using the behavioral pain scale
Through study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks
Number of Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
Time Frame: Though study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks
This includes any adverse event that was graded as having a possible, probable or definite relationship to the study intervention.
Though study completion, an expected average of 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LM-KINDRED-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiration, Artificial

Clinical Trials on Breath synchronized abdominal NMES

Search Similar Trials