Supplemental Oxygen and Oxygen Desaturations in Colonoscopies

March 31, 2026 updated by: University of Utah

Evaluation of Oxygen Desaturation and Apnea Events With Supplemental Oxygen During Procedural Sedation in Colonoscopies

This study will compare apnea and oxygen desaturation events among various methods of supplemental oxygen delivery during procedural sedation in colonoscopy patients. The goals of the study are to track apnea (10 or more seconds without respiration) and oxygen desaturation (hemoglobin oxygen saturation less than 90%) events in colonoscopy patients receiving one of three different methods of supplemental oxygen administration. The first method is standard-of-care continuous flow oxygen therapy, where a constant flow of oxygen is administered through a nasal cannula or oxygen mask. The second method is synchronized flow oxygen therapy. This is a delivery method implemented in an FDA-cleared medical device (Sovant, Dynasthetics LLC) which delivers variable-volume oxygen pulses only as the patient inhales. The delivered oxygen pulses are commensurate to the set flow rate and the patient's respiratory rate. The third method is continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP), where non-invasive pressure support is given to the patient's airway to help keep their airway open. The hypothesis being tested is that synchronized flow delivery and CPAP therapy will demonstrate reductions in apnea and oxygen desaturation events compared to traditional continuous flow oxygen therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sedation procedures such as colonoscopies involve administering drugs to patients that reduce awareness and pain without complete loss of consciousness. A side effect of these drugs is respiratory depression, where the patient's breathing becomes more shallow and less frequent. Another side effect is partial or complete obstruction of the airway by the airway tissue, inhibiting the flow of oxygen to the lungs. When a patient experiences significant respiratory depression or airway obstruction, they may not receive adequate oxygen, which may result in low hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2), which is generally monitored with a probe on a finger. This may lead to inadequate oxygenation of tissues or organs and can lead to permanent organ damage or even death in severe cases.

The current standard approach to prevent oxygen desaturation during procedural sedation is supplemental oxygen therapy, usually administered through a nasal cannula or oxygen mask. The traditional method is continuous flow oxygen therapy, where a constant flow of oxygen is given. Research has demonstrated that while this does improve overall oxygen saturation levels during sedation, oxygen desaturation and apnea still frequently occur.

An FDA-cleared intelligent oxygen delivery device (Sovant, Dynasthetics LLC) that is relatively new to the market provides a new approach to supplemental oxygen delivery called synchronized flow, which delivers variable-volume pulses of high-flow oxygen only as the patient inhales. The volumes of the pulses are based on a set flow rate and the patients respiratory rate. Research has shown that higher oxygen concentrations reach the lungs when using synchronized flow delivery as opposed to continuous flow oxygen delivery, but research has yet to demonstrate that synchronized flow reduces oxygen desaturation events.

Research has demonstrated that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, which involves directing air flow into a tight-fitting mask over the patient's nostrils and/or mouth to stent open the airway, effectively reduces oxygen desaturation and apnea when administered with a non-invasive ventilator. However, non-invasive ventilators used for administering PAP therapy are expensive, large, require special training to operate, and often are not available in areas of the hospital where sedation procedures take place, making this a less-practical approach.

We have developed a smaller low-cost CPAP system for sedation as an additional software feature and disposable integrated into the FDA-cleared intelligent oxygen delivery device that also administers continuous flow and synchronized flow supplemental oxygen (Sovant, Dynasthetics LLC). The aim of the study is to administer supplemental oxygen to colonoscopy patients using these three different administration methods (continuous flow, synchronized flow, and CPAP therapy) and evaluate differences in oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) and apnea (10 seconds or more without respiration) events. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of synchronized flow oxygen delivery compared to continuous flow oxygen delivery in reducing oxygen desaturation and apnea. We also aim to evaluate whether our compact and low-cost CPAP system can also effectively reduce oxygen desaturation and apnea compared to the current standard practice of continuous flow delivery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • South Jordan, Utah, United States, 84009
        • University of Utah South Jordan Health Center - Endoscopy
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient
  • No life threatening conditions
  • Undergoing colonoscopy procedures and receiving procedural sedation at the University of Utah Health clinic in South Jordan, Utah.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability/refusal of subject to provide informed consent.
  • Less than 18 years of age.
  • Standard colonoscopy exclusion criteria used at the GI lab at the University of Utah.
  • Patients known or suspected to be pregnant.
  • Patients with an ASA physical status of IV (A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life) or V (A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation).
  • Patients known to have acute respiratory distress syndrome, severe COPD, or cardiovascular disease.
  • If their oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) is below 93% while breathing room air prior to the procedure.
  • Patients with severe medical condition(s) that in the view of the acting physician prohibits participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous Oxygen Flow
This arm is the traditional supplemental oxygen delivery of providing a continuous oxygen flow through a nasal cannula or non-rebreather oxygen mask at a flow rate set by the anesthetist.
This is the traditional approach of administering oxygen at a constant flow rate chosen by the anesthetist through a nasal cannula or non-rebreather oxygen mask.
Other Names:
  • Continuous flow
Experimental: Synchronized Oxygen Flow
This arm is breath-synchronized oxygen delivery with the FDA-cleared Sovant oxygen delivery device through a nasal cannula or non-rebreather mask. Oxygen is pulsed at the beginning of the patient's inhalation and flow is discontinued the rest of the breath.
This is breath-synchronized oxygen delivery of supplemental oxygen by the FDA-cleared Sovant device, where oxygen is given synchronously with the patient's inhalation only through a nasal cannula or non-rebreather oxygen mask.
Other Names:
  • Synchronized Flow
Experimental: CPAP
This arm is oxygen delivery through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy administered by an investigational device, where oxygen is given through a tight-fitting mask over the patient's mouth and nose. The oxygen flow rate is automatically adjusted by the device to maintain a set pressure in the patient's airway as selected by the anesthetist.
Supplemental oxygen delivered via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy through a tight-fitting mask over the patient's mouth and nose, where oxygen flow rate is automatically adjusted by the investigational devce to maintain the anesthetist-selected airway pressure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxygen Saturation AUC
Time Frame: The duration of the procedure
The area under the hemoglobin oxygen saturation curve (AUC) will be calculated as the difference between the desaturation threshold of 90% and the recorded SpO2 integrated over the duration that SpO2 was below the 90% threshold.
The duration of the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apneic events
Time Frame: The duration of the procedure
The number and duration of apneic events, with apnea defined as 10 seconds or more without respiration.
The duration of the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kai Kuck, PhD, University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Obstruction

Clinical Trials on Control

Subscribe