Standard Tubal Ligation Versus Salpingectomy for Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Standard Tubal Ligation Versus Salpingectomy for Sterilization at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation in women undergoing surgical sterilization at the time of a planned cesarean delivery. Salpingectomy is currently being investigated as a potential strategy for ovarian cancer prevention. While this procedure is currently performed during hysterectomies, its feasibility at the time of cesarean delivery is not well established.
This randomized, prospective clinical trial will compare the two sterilization methods to demonstrate that salpingectomy compared with standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery will not result in increased operative time, blood loss or other complications. This study is necessary to promote salpingectomy as a standard sterilization method during cesarean deliveries.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
- University of Virginia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must have planned cesarean delivery and desire sterilization
- Subjects must be able to read and provide written informed consent
- Subjects must be English or Spanish speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with known hereditary cancer syndromes
- Subjects with a history of prior tubal surgery
- Subjects with a placenta accreta
- Subjects undergoing trial of labor after cesarean delivery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Control
Tubal sterilization will be performed by standard tubal ligation, either Parkland or Pomeroy technique, at the time of cesarean section
|
Standard tubal ligation by either Parkland or Pomeroy technique will be performed at cesarean section
|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Tubal sterilization will be performed by bilateral salpingectomy using a ligasure device at the time of cesarean section.
|
Bilateral salpingectomy will be performed instead of standard tubal ligation as sterilization during cesarean section.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time of tubal ligation
Time Frame: at time of procedure
|
Primary outcome will be the time it takes to complete the sterilization procedure
|
at time of procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total procedure time
Time Frame: at time of procedure
|
The total time it takes to complete the cesarean plus sterilization procedure
|
at time of procedure
|
|
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: at time of procedure
|
Estimated blood loss for the entire procedure
|
at time of procedure
|
|
Rate of aborted procedures
Time Frame: at time of procedure
|
Inability to complete bilateral salpingectomy in the experimental arm
|
at time of procedure
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reoperation rate
Time Frame: within 6 weeks
|
Rate of reoperation within 6 weeks
|
within 6 weeks
|
|
Length of stay
Time Frame: within 1008 hours
|
Length of stay in hours
|
within 1008 hours
|
|
Readmission rate
Time Frame: within 6 weeks
|
Rate of readmission within 6 weeks
|
within 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kate' Pettit, MD, University of Virginia
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19517 (Other Identifier: City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Method of Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Section
-
NCT03475303UnknownThe Effect of Early Versus Traditional Hospital Discharge for Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
-
NCT01846858CompletedExtent of Thermal Injury Using Different Energy Sources at the Time of Robotic Hysterectomy Procedure
-
NCT06585748RecruitingUrinary Catheterization As the Cause of Abnormal Reaction of Patient, or of Later Complication, Without Mention of Misadventure At Time of Procedure
-
NCT04981353Active, not recruitingNumerical Rating Pain Score | the Total Doses of Pethidine Needed Through-out Delivery Will be Measured | the Incidence of Failed Delivery and Need of Cesarean Section Will be Assessed | the Incidence of Transient Fetal Bradycardia or Deceleration After the Administration of the Block Will be Recorded | ABGAR Score of the Neonate
-
NCT07540429RecruitingDiagnosis of BPD Based on the DIB-R Clinical Interview for the BPD Group | Diagnosis of ADHD Using the KSADS-PL for the ADHD Group | Absence of Pathology on the CBCL and Ab-DIB for the Healthy Control Group | All Participants Were Euthymic at the Time of Task Administration
-
NCT05260970RecruitingSuturing of Rectus Muscle at Cesarean Section
-
NCT05841888CompletedThe Aim of Our Study Was to Evaluate the Outcomes in Women Who Implemented the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol at Delivery by Cesarean Delivery
-
NCT02183857CompletedTime Needed to Achieve a Successful Cannulation of the Femoral Artery in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
-
NCT04006249Completedto Evaluate the Prevalence of Periodontal Diseases in Patients With Hemochromatosis at the Time of Diagnosis and / or Their Usual Therapeutic
-
NCT01784380CompletedThe Investigators Collected 534 PCOS Patients as the Case Group,and 580 Infertile Women With Normal Ovulatory Cycle of the Control Group; | At the Same Time, the Investigators Continuedly Collect Cases to October 2012, and Totally Collected 579 Patients With PCOS Altogether; | 534 Patients in the Cases Group and 580 Women in the Control Group Received no Measures, While 579 Patients Received Drugs; | The Investigators Monitored Basic Indexes in Blood of All the Subjects in This Suvey,and Also Monitored Indexes of 579 Patients After Treatment.
Clinical Trials on Tubal ligation
-
NCT02377128Unknown
-
NCT03135431Completed
-
NCT02527278Completed
-
NCT02374827Completed
-
NCT03860805Active, not recruitingLaparoscopy | Ovarian Reserve | Salpingectomy | Sterilization Tubal
-
NCT02944149Completed
-
NCT06509425RecruitingPelvic Congestion Syndrome