Ridge Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Augmented With Freeze Dried Bone Allograft

November 14, 2018 updated by: Mark Ryder, University of California, San Francisco

Ridge Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Augmented With Freeze Dried Bone Allograft: A Comparative Clinical, Histological, and Micro-computed Tomography Study

Improved predictability and quality of bone healing after a tooth is removed is clinically relevant, in that, it improves our ability to achieve successful implant placement at edentulous sites. Currently, a variety of grafting materials and biologic agents are utilized clinically to improve bone healing and provide sufficient dimensions of bone to support a dental implant. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) is one such product that can be used for this application. PRF is a concentrated blood product attained from the patient's own blood consisting of a natural bioscaffold with integrated growth factors capable of sustained release. Once processed, PRF is implanted back into the patient at the wound or defect site to encourage healing. The literature regarding PRF is currently dominated by heterogeneous applications of PRF for reparative and regenerative therapies without a consensus of its clinical efficacy and appropriate application. In this clinical study, PRF will be evaluated to ascertain its clinical efficacy in improving bone formation and alveolar dimensional stability after tooth extraction. A classic bone grafting material used for this purpose, freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA), will be incorporated with the PRF or compared directly to PRF alone. It is hypothesized that the natural scaffold and incorporated growth factors of PRF augmented with the solubility resistance of FDBA will function as an ideal bioscaffold to promote bone healing to a greater extent compared to PRF, FDBA, or blood clot alone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controlled clinical study evaluating the efficacy of four treatment modalities for ridge preservation after extraction of a tooth in preparation for dental implant placement. After tooth extraction the alveolar crest remodels during healing with reductions in vertical and horizontal dimensions. The resulting reduced dimensions after healing of the alveolar crest may be inadequate to successfully place a dental implant to replace the missing tooth. In an attempt to minimize the reductions in dimensions and provide mature healthy bone to support the dental implant, different ridge preservation techniques (treatment of the extraction socket) have been utilized.

Forty subject from the UCSF Dental School who will be having a tooth extracted and replaced with a dental implant will be randomly assigned into the four ridge preservation treatment groups. After three months of healing bone samples from the ridge preservation site will be collected during the implant placement when bone is removed during the osteotomy preparation for the implant. Samples will be evaluated for the extent and quality of bone healing via histomorphometric and micro-CT analysis. Clinical measures of alveolar ridge dimensions will be taken before and after tooth extraction to determine extent of dimensional stability under the different treatment groups.

The four treatments modalities for ridge preservation include autologous platelet rich fibrin (PRF), PRF+freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA), FDBA, collagen barrier membrane. Subjects will be enrolled in the study from the time the socket treated to the time of implant placement (3 months). The results of this study will help to elucidate the extent and quality of bone healing using four different methods for ridge preservation in preparation for implant placement. Further, this study will advance our knowledge of PRF, an autologous sourced blood product used in dentoalveolar surgeries with proven in-vitro qualities but still requiring more extensive clinical testing to demonstrate its full clinical utility.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Single rooted teeth requiring extraction
  2. Intact buccal and lingual plate within approximately 3-4 mm from gingival crest
  3. No clinical or radiographic signs of periapical pathology
  4. Acceptable oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to comply with necessary scheduled visits
  2. Poor oral hygiene
  3. Failing/failed endodontic treatment with history/presence of sinus tracts
  4. Pregnant woman or patients who intend to become pregnant
  5. Tobacco use
  6. Immunosuppressed
  7. Type I or type II diabetes
  8. Patient with any blood disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRF
Autologous blood product used to graft extraction socket
Experimental: PRF+FDBA
Autologous blood product used to graft extraction socket
Graft material used to graft extraction socket
Active Comparator: FDBA
Graft material used to graft extraction socket
Active Comparator: Blood Clot
Surgical treatment of extraction socket without addition of graft material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Vital Bone
Time Frame: 3 months
Percentage of vital bone at healed extraction socket
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: 3 months
The bone mineral density (measured via micro-CT) at healed extraction sockets
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Ryder, DDS, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14-13360

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Clinical Trials on PRF

Search Similar Trials