Periapical Bleeding Versus PRF Techniques in Regenerative Endodontic Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

March 13, 2025 updated by: Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Comparison of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures Using Periapical Bleeding Induction, L-PRF, and I-PRF in Mature Teeth With Periapical Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This study investigates a biological approach that allows infected and necrotic teeth to heal themselves instead of being treated with traditional root canal therapy. Traditional root canal treatment involves cleaning the infected tissue inside the tooth and sealing it with a filling material, whereas regenerative endodontic treatment is a novel approach that enables the tooth to repair itself. This treatment method involves inducing bleeding in the root area or applying special blood derivatives (PRF types) to accumulate healing-supporting cells and growth factors. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of different biological treatment methods on the healing process, postoperative pain, and tooth discoloration. The results may help develop more effective and aesthetically successful treatment options in the future.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study investigates the effectiveness of regenerative endodontic procedures in the treatment of necrotic and infected teeth. Traditional root canal treatment involves the complete removal of infected tissue from inside the tooth and sealing the root canal with a biocompatible filling material. However, this method does not restore the tooth's natural vitality or protective mechanisms. Additionally, it may increase tooth fragility and lead to discoloration over time.

Regenerative endodontic treatment is a biological approach that promotes the self-healing of the tooth. This method applies tissue engineering principles to stimulate the formation of new tissue within the root canal. During the treatment process, either bleeding is induced at the root tip or special platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) derivatives are applied to facilitate the accumulation of stem cells, growth factors, and immune-boosting components that support healing.

This study compares the effects of different regenerative treatment methods (bleeding induction, L-PRF, and I-PRF applications) on lesion healing, postoperative pain, and tooth discoloration. By determining the most effective method for teeth with completed root development and apical lesions, the study aims to establish an optimal treatment protocol for clinical practice. The findings will contribute to the development of treatment options that preserve the natural structure of the tooth, enhance aesthetics, and improve patient comfort and long-term treatment success.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Etlik
      • Ankara, Etlik, Turkey, 06010
        • Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single-rooted teeth with mature teeth with necrotic pulp requiring endodontic treatment, and a periapical lesion (Periapical Index Score (PAI) ≥3).
  • Individuals without systemic diseases, not using antibiotics, corticosteroids, antidiabetic, or antihypertensive medications, and not pregnant.
  • Patients without acute pain.
  • Patients without extraoral swelling, sinus tract, or acute apical abscess.
  • Individuals willing to participate and able to attend follow-up sessions regularly.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with internal or external root resorption or vertical root fractures.
  • Immature teeth.
  • Individuals outside the age range of 14-65 years.
  • Patients with complicated systemic diseases or those using antibiotics, corticosteroids, antidiabetic, or antihypertensive medications.
  • Patients with acute pain, those who have taken analgesic medication in the last 24 hours, or those who have used antibiotics within two weeks before treatment.
  • Patients who are unlikely to attend follow-up sessions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AP
Necrotic pulped, mature teeth with apical periodontitis.
Revascularization
Regenerative endodontic procedure with L-PRF application
Regenerative endodontic procedure with i-PRF application

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic Assessment of Lesion Healing at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Lesion healing will be evaluated using periapical radiographs with the parallel technique, and the Periapical Index (PAI) will be used for the assessment of lesion healing.
Baseline and 6 months
Change in Pain Level at 24 Hours, 72 Hours, and 1 Week Post-Treatment
Time Frame: Post-Treatment at 24 Hours, 72 Hours, and 1 Week
Pain levels will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain), measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week post-procedure.
Post-Treatment at 24 Hours, 72 Hours, and 1 Week
Assessment of Tooth Discoloration at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Tooth discoloration will be evaluated using a spectrophotometer based on the CIELab system, and teeth with a ΔE value greater than 3 will be considered discolored.
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HKORUCU1
  • 2023/056 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Health Sciences University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The impact of gender differences on pain assessment in the study was also evaluated. Additionally, the effect of age on lesion healing was analyzed. Since the study examines the effects of demographic data on lesion healing and post-treatment pain, demographic data will be shared.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Apical Periodontitis

Subscribe