Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Transperineal Targeted Biopsy Compared to Standard Transrectal Biopsy

May 22, 2019 updated by: The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

Assessing the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transperineal Targeted Biopsy Compared to Standard Transrectal Biopsy Outcomes Study: The ASTROS Trial

Prostate biopsies are currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Many biopsies, however, are unnecessary or cannot detect significant prostate cancer (PCa). With multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) we now potentially have a way of increasing the detection of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) while decreasing the detection of non-significant PCa.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In men with previously negative prostate biopsy and persistent elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, it is unclear which biopsy strategy offers the highest detection rate for significant prostate cancer. The hypothesis of this study is that targeted MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy improves the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa) compared with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Patients who fulfill all eligibility criteria and have provided written consent will be randomized to undergo MRI followed by biopsies (arm A) or TRUS transrectal biopsy (arm-B). Patients will be randomly assigned to arm A or arm B following a 1:1 simple randomization procedure according to a computer-generated randomization list. The primary end point will be the comparison of detection rates csPCa between arm A and arm B. csPCa will be defined according to the Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) criteria for targeted biopsy Gleason Score ≥ 7 or maximum CCL ≥ 5 mm and the updated Epstein criteria for SB (Gleason score ≥ 7, PSA density ≥ 0.15, Gleason score ≥ 2 positive cores, and bilateral cancer). The secondary end points will be (1) Comparison of the overall detection rate of PCa and csPCa between arm A mpMRI+ and arm B and (2) Comparison of complication rates between arm A mpMRI+ and arm B.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
        • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males aged 18-75 years old
  2. PSA >1 ng/ml but <15 ng/ml
  3. Negative DRE
  4. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous prostate biopsy or prostate surgery
  2. Previous prostate mpMRI
  3. Contraindication to mpMRI: patients with pacemakers, defibrillators or other implanted electronic devices
  4. Patients in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (prisoners)
  5. Patients with acute urinary symptoms including urinary retention and urinary tract infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: MRI/ultrasound transperineal prostate biopsy
In arm A, all patients with positive mpMRI evidence of lesions suspicious for PCa, i.e. PI RADS ≥ 3 will be submitted to transperineal mpMRI-targeted prostate biopsy (arm A MRI+). The gland and the regions of interest will be contoured, and the prostate contour will be fused in real time with the TRUS image. Biopsies will be performed via a transperineal approach in the operating room. The patient will be placed in dorsal lithotomy position. mpMRI-targeted biopsies will be performed on regions of interest, and three to six cores will be obtained for biopsy from each lesion and is standard of care according to START criteria for targeted biopsy. In cases of negative mpMRI results i.e. PI RADS<3, arm A patients will undergo TRUS-guided transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy (arm A MRI-) as described in arm B.
Device: MRI/ultrasound transperineal prostate biopsy
3-6 targeted biopsy cores from each prostate region of interest
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
TRUS-guided transrectal prostate biopsy will be performed using a disposable 18-gauge biopsy gun with a specimen size of 18-22 mm (Bard Medical, Covington, GA, USA). The 12 cores will be obtained from 12 separate anatomical regions of the prostate which is standard practice in performing TRUS-guided transrectal prostate biopsy: left medial apex, left lateral apex, left medial midgland, left lateral midgland, left medial base, left lateral base, right medial apex, right lateral apex, right medial midgland, right lateral midgland, right medial base and right lateral base.
Device: transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
12 systematic biopsy cores

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Time Frame: Within 2-4 wks after biopsy
Number of subjects with positive clinically significant prostate cancer results
Within 2-4 wks after biopsy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Detection Rate of Prostate Cancer Between Arm A mpMRI+ and Arm B
Time Frame: Within 2-4 wks from biopsy
Number of overall positive prostate cancer (Combined positive and clinically significant positive results) Not all positive prostate biopsies are considered clinically significant. Clinically significant results indicate further work up and/or treatment. Physicians and patients may choose not to just monitor non-clinically significant prostate results for future changes. The overall detection rate will report the total number of both non-clinically significant positive results and clinically significant results.
Within 2-4 wks from biopsy
Comparison of UTI Incidence in Arm A mpMRI+ and Arm B
Time Frame: From the time of biopsy through 4 weeks post-biopsy
Number of confirmed UTIs
From the time of biopsy through 4 weeks post-biopsy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen B Williams, MD, University of Texas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 25, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 12, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17-0013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on MRI/ultrasound transperineal prostate biopsy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings