Risk Stratification in Primary Care Combined With Stratified-specific Physical Therapy Care for Low Back Pain

September 5, 2018 updated by: Sharon Henry, University of Vermont Medical Center

Does Risk Stratification in Primary Care Combined With Stratified-specific Physical Therapy Care Improve Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain Compared to Those Who Receive Only Current Care?

This study aims to examine patient outcomes following risk stratification for low back pain in Family Medicine combined with either matched physical therapy (PT - i.e., stratified-specific PT) treatments or current treatment in primary care across The University of Vermont Health Network.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The University of Vermont Health Network is a five hospital network that serves primarily a rural population of approximately 1 million people in Vermont and upstate New York. The primary aim of this prospective, longitudinal, pragmatic, non-randomized clustered, non-blinded, controlled trial is to examine whether PT treatment stratified to match the patient's risk factors based on the STarT Back Tool is more effective than the current treatment in primary care for non-specific low back pain (LBP) in improving short- (6 months) and long-term (12-month) patient outcomes (disability).

To do the risk stratification, investigators will use the STarT Back Tool which is designed for primary care settings and is validated for non-specific LBP (acute flare-ups or chronic pain). The tool is designed to identify the prognostic risk (low, medium, high) for progression to chronic LBP. In addition, the tool assists clinicians in decision making to ensure that low risk patients are not over treated or medicalized, that 'at risk' patients get access to the right provider early on and that enhanced care is given for complex cases. Thus, the tool assists in matching the 'right patient to the right treatment' at the 'right time' which is critical given the high prevalence and cost of LBP.

Patients with a primary diagnosis of LBP (acute flare-up or chronic) who are seen in any of the six Family Medicine sites will complete the STarT Back Tool and the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (mODI). With the non-randomized, cluster design, three of the Family Medicine sites are identified as "Participating Sites" and three are identified as "Comparator Sites." Patients with low back pain from "Participating Sites" who are stratified as medium- or high-risk patients will be referred to physical therapy (PT) for a matched (i.e., stratified-specific treatment). Those patients who are identified as low-risk will be retained in Family Medicine for management using advice, reassurance, patient education, NSAIDs (no imaging or specialist referral is encouraged). Patients with low back pain from "Comparator Sites" will be managed according to current care practices in Family Medicine. Using the mODI, the investigators will compare the two study arms at short- (6 months) and long-term points (12 months).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
        • University of Vermont Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosis of acute, chronic or non-specific LBP,
  2. between 21 - 60 years of age,
  3. able to stand and walk without assistance,
  4. able to understand and read English,
  5. able to understand and sign a consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. active serious spinal complications such as tumor or infection,
  2. active treatment for metastatic or bone cancer of the spine,
  3. pregnancy or less than 6 months post-partum or less than 6 months post weaning.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Stratified Care
In three "Participating Sites" from Family Medicine sites, the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool will be administered to patients with acute and chronic low back pain and based on patients' responses, patients will be stratified into one of three risk groups: low, medium or high-risk. Patients in the medium- and high-risk groups will be referred to physical therapy for a matched physical therapy (PT) intervention based on the risk strata. Patients in the low-risk group will be managed in Family Medicine with an intervention that includes advice, reassurance, patient education, and NSAIDs (with no referral for imaging or specialist care).
Other: Matched Physical Therapy Intervention

Patients who are medium-risk will receive up to 6-8 physical therapy (PT) visits over a 3 month period that is guided by published evidence based practice guidelines. The PT treatment will be tailored to the physical findings and specific patient needs, and appropriate exercises, spinal mobilization/manipulation, strengthening/stretching as well as a home program will be given to improve patient pain and function and reduce disability.

Patients who are high-risk will receive the evidence based PT treatment as deemed necessary. In addition, the PT treatment will incorporate principles of psychologically informed practice to address psychosocial barriers (e.g., fear avoidance, anxiety, etc) that may be impeding disability reduction. This may include instruction on chronic pain rehabilitation techniques such as the use of: pacing in order to maintain or increase activity; graded activity principles in order to increase function; and pain education and understanding responses to pain.
Active Comparator: Current Care
In three "Comparator Sites" from Family Medicine, providers will give the current care at The University of Vermont Medical Center for patients with acute and chronic low back pain.
Other: Current Care in Family Medicine
Patient education, medication management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
Low back pain disability measure
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Vermont Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sharon M Henry, PT, PhD, The University of Vermont Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 29, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16-494

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Matched Physical Therapy Intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings