Physical Therapy Treatments, Including Neural Mobilization and Hip/Back Stretches for People Between 50-89 With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Leg Pain Provoked by Walking

Neural And Hip Mobilizations In Patients With Neurogenic Claudication Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Case Series

Aging of the back is common in the older people and can result in difficulties standing and walking. Conservative treatment is recommended before considering surgery. Some recommended exercises involve the use of expensive equipment. The present study plans to evaluate if specifically moving the nerves in the legs/back and improving flexibility of the hip and back can benefit patients. These exercises require no equipment, are simple to perform, and can provide patients a way to continue to perform these exercises at home. The purposes of this study are to (1) observe the benefit of a treatment program involving moving the nerves of the leg/back, stretching the legs and low back in patients with low back pain and difficulties walking; and (2) determine if benefits received remain at a 3-month follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79109
        • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged between 50-89 years old
  • Intermittent unilateral or bilateral leg pain occurring with walking and standing activities that is relieved only with sitting or by assuming flexed positions
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) confirmation of lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Leg symptoms greater than 4/10 and provoked within 15 minutes of walking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior lumbar surgery
  • Spinal injection in last 6 weeks
  • Impaired walking tolerance due to factors other than neurogenic claudication
  • Inability to follow the rater's instructions
  • Any medical contra-indication for hip mobilizations in extension or flexion
  • Current medico-legal issues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Double knee to chest stretches, hip extension mobilization, neural mobilizations, home exercises program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire is a condition specific measure used for subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis. The measure consists of three separate subscales: Symptom, Functional, Satisfaction. Each scale has five to seven items, with each item scored on a Likert response scale with four to five options. The subscale score is calculated as the unweighted mean of all answered items, with a range of scores for each subscale as follows: one to five for symptom severity, one to four for physical function, and one to four for satisfaction. Lower scores represent fewer symptoms, greater function, and greater satisfaction with the results of their treatment. The subscale scores will be assessed independently of each other.
Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is an objective measure for subjects to rate their pain. This measure uses an 11 point scale where "0" represents "no pain" and "10" represents "the worst imaginable pain". Subjects in this study will be asked to rate their average pain during walking activities during the past week. The NPRS is a valid measure that has been shown to have good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.61) (Childs et al 2005). This measure has been used in previous studies examining subjects with degenerative LSS.
Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
Change in Total Ambulation Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks
Total Ambulation Time is an objective test to measure walking tolerance that has shown concordance correlation coefficient of 0.96 test-retest reliability in subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis (Deen et al 2000). This is a valid measure as it reproduces a subject's symptoms in the same manner as they are reproduced during daily life. Subjects will be asked to ambulate on a treadmill in a fully erect posture at a self-selected walking pace. Subjects will not be permitted to lean forward or hold onto handrails. Ambulation will be stopped at 15 minutes or when the subject reports a level of discomfort in their leg(s) that would cause them to stop walking in usual daily life situations (Deen et al 2000). The subject will be asked to remain standing for up to 15 seconds (if tolerated) in order to assess whether the leg symptoms can resolve in standing or if sitting is required. Longer walking times are considered an improvement in condition with this test.
Baseline, 3-6 weeks
Change in Time to First Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks
Time to First Symptoms is an objective test used to record the time it takes before the onset of leg symptoms during treadmill ambulation. This measure has shown concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98 for test-retest reliability in subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis (Deen et al 2000). It is a valid measure of leg symptoms onset during an ambulation activity, which is responsible for symptom onset in daily life. Subjects will ambulate on a treadmill in a fully erect posture. Subjects will ambulate at a self-selected comfortable walking pace and will not be permitted to lean forward or hold onto handrails. Subjects will be asked to report the moment of first onset of leg symptoms (unilateral or bilateral leg pain, fatigue, paresthesia, and/or tightness). Longer times to the onset of first symptoms are considered an improvement in condition with this test
Baseline, 3-6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Reid D Gehring, DPT, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • Study Chair: Jean-Michel Brismee, ScD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All collected IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Physical therapy intervention

Subscribe