- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03368638
Physical Therapy Treatments, Including Neural Mobilization and Hip/Back Stretches for People Between 50-89 With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Leg Pain Provoked by Walking
January 22, 2021 updated by: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Neural And Hip Mobilizations In Patients With Neurogenic Claudication Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Case Series
Aging of the back is common in the older people and can result in difficulties standing and walking.
Conservative treatment is recommended before considering surgery.
Some recommended exercises involve the use of expensive equipment.
The present study plans to evaluate if specifically moving the nerves in the legs/back and improving flexibility of the hip and back can benefit patients.
These exercises require no equipment, are simple to perform, and can provide patients a way to continue to perform these exercises at home.
The purposes of this study are to (1) observe the benefit of a treatment program involving moving the nerves of the leg/back, stretching the legs and low back in patients with low back pain and difficulties walking; and (2) determine if benefits received remain at a 3-month follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
8
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79109
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
50 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged between 50-89 years old
- Intermittent unilateral or bilateral leg pain occurring with walking and standing activities that is relieved only with sitting or by assuming flexed positions
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) confirmation of lumbar spinal stenosis
- Leg symptoms greater than 4/10 and provoked within 15 minutes of walking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior lumbar surgery
- Spinal injection in last 6 weeks
- Impaired walking tolerance due to factors other than neurogenic claudication
- Inability to follow the rater's instructions
- Any medical contra-indication for hip mobilizations in extension or flexion
- Current medico-legal issues
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
|
Double knee to chest stretches, hip extension mobilization, neural mobilizations, home exercises program
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
|
The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire is a condition specific measure used for subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis.
The measure consists of three separate subscales: Symptom, Functional, Satisfaction.
Each scale has five to seven items, with each item scored on a Likert response scale with four to five options.
The subscale score is calculated as the unweighted mean of all answered items, with a range of scores for each subscale as follows: one to five for symptom severity, one to four for physical function, and one to four for satisfaction.
Lower scores represent fewer symptoms, greater function, and greater satisfaction with the results of their treatment.
The subscale scores will be assessed independently of each other.
|
Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
|
|
Change in Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
|
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is an objective measure for subjects to rate their pain.
This measure uses an 11 point scale where "0" represents "no pain" and "10" represents "the worst imaginable pain".
Subjects in this study will be asked to rate their average pain during walking activities during the past week.
The NPRS is a valid measure that has been shown to have good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.61) (Childs et al 2005).
This measure has been used in previous studies examining subjects with degenerative LSS.
|
Baseline, 3-6 weeks, 3-6 months
|
|
Change in Total Ambulation Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks
|
Total Ambulation Time is an objective test to measure walking tolerance that has shown concordance correlation coefficient of 0.96 test-retest reliability in subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis (Deen et al 2000).
This is a valid measure as it reproduces a subject's symptoms in the same manner as they are reproduced during daily life.
Subjects will be asked to ambulate on a treadmill in a fully erect posture at a self-selected walking pace.
Subjects will not be permitted to lean forward or hold onto handrails.
Ambulation will be stopped at 15 minutes or when the subject reports a level of discomfort in their leg(s) that would cause them to stop walking in usual daily life situations (Deen et al 2000).
The subject will be asked to remain standing for up to 15 seconds (if tolerated) in order to assess whether the leg symptoms can resolve in standing or if sitting is required.
Longer walking times are considered an improvement in condition with this test.
|
Baseline, 3-6 weeks
|
|
Change in Time to First Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-6 weeks
|
Time to First Symptoms is an objective test used to record the time it takes before the onset of leg symptoms during treadmill ambulation.
This measure has shown concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98 for test-retest reliability in subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis (Deen et al 2000).
It is a valid measure of leg symptoms onset during an ambulation activity, which is responsible for symptom onset in daily life.
Subjects will ambulate on a treadmill in a fully erect posture.
Subjects will ambulate at a self-selected comfortable walking pace and will not be permitted to lean forward or hold onto handrails.
Subjects will be asked to report the moment of first onset of leg symptoms (unilateral or bilateral leg pain, fatigue, paresthesia, and/or tightness).
Longer times to the onset of first symptoms are considered an improvement in condition with this test
|
Baseline, 3-6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Reid D Gehring, DPT, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
- Study Chair: Jean-Michel Brismee, ScD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ellis RF, Hing WA. Neural mobilization: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(1):8-22. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818594.
- Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
- Deen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, McPhee MC, Verheijde JL, Lemens SM. Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Oct;75(10):1002-7. doi: 10.4065/75.10.1002.
- Burns SA, Mintken PE, Austin GP, Cleland J. Short-term response of hip mobilizations and exercise in individuals with chronic low back pain: a case series. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 May;19(2):100-7. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.0000000007.
- Katz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G, Katz NP, Bayley J, Fossel AH, Chang LC, Lipson SJ. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Sep;38(9):1236-41. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380910.
- Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, Kusakabe T, Ishii Y, Itoi E. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):207-13. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182134e73.
- Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, Wainner RS, Gill HE, Ryder MG, Garber MB, Bennett AC, Fritz JM. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 15;31(22):2541-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000241136.98159.8c.
- Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Fritz JM. Nonsurgical management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a literature review and a case series of three patients managed with physical therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003 Feb;14(1):77-101, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/s1047-9651(02)00076-1.
- Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL, Gregory AA, Clary R. A non-surgical approach to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Feb 23;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-16.
- Bodack MP, Monteiro M. Therapeutic exercise in the treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):144-52. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00017.
- Pua YH, Cai CC, Lim KC. Treadmill walking with body weight support is no more effective than cycling when added to an exercise program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(2):83-9. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70040-5.
- Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016 Jan 4;352:h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.
- Gilbert KK, Roger James C, Apte G, Brown C, Sizer PS, Brismee JM, Smith MP. Effects of simulated neural mobilization on fluid movement in cadaveric peripheral nerve sections: implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and dysfunction. J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Sep;23(4):219-25. doi: 10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000094.
- Ammendolia C, Chow N. Clinical outcomes for neurogenic claudication using a multimodal program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(3):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
- Backstrom KM, Whitman JM, Flynn TW. Lumbar spinal stenosis-diagnosis and management of the aging spine. Man Ther. 2011 Aug;16(4):308-17. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
- Bade M, Cobo-Estevez M, Neeley D, Pandya J, Gunderson T, Cook C. Effects of manual therapy and exercise targeting the hips in patients with low-back pain-A randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):734-740. doi: 10.1111/jep.12705. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
- Cleland JA, Whitman JM, Houser JL, Wainner RS, Childs JD. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):921-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
- Fritz JM, Delitto A, Welch WC, Erhard RE. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jun;79(6):700-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90048-x.
- Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):253-65. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001.
- Gilbert KK, Smith MP, Sobczak S, James CR, Sizer PS, Brismee JM. Effects of lower limb neurodynamic mobilization on intraneural fluid dispersion of the fourth lumbar nerve root: an unembalmed cadaveric investigation. J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Dec;23(5):239-45. doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000009.
- Goren A, Yildiz N, Topuz O, Findikoglu G, Ardic F. Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jul;24(7):623-31. doi: 10.1177/0269215510367539. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
- Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, Hasegawa T, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH. Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 1;21(21):2412-20. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611010-00002.
- Kerrigan DC, Xenopoulos-Oddsson A, Sullivan MJ, Lelas JJ, Riley PO. Effect of a hip flexor-stretching program on gait in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):1-6. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50056.
- Kobayashi S, Uchida K, Takeno K, Baba H, Suzuki Y, Hayakawa K, Yoshizawa H. Imaging of cauda equina edema in lumbar canal stenosis by using gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: experimental constriction injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):346-53.
- Koc Z, Ozcakir S, Sivrioglu K, Gurbet A, Kucukoglu S. Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):985-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c0a6b.
- Konno S, Kikuchi S, Tanaka Y, Yamazaki K, Shimada Y, Takei H, Yokoyama T, Okada M, Kokubun S. A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Oct 30;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-102.
- Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, Hwang SW, Mendel RC, Reitman CA; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059.
- Lee LW, Zavarei K, Evans J, Lelas JJ, Riley PO, Kerrigan DC. Reduced hip extension in the elderly: dynamic or postural? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1851-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.008.
- Macedo LG, Hum A, Kuleba L, Mo J, Truong L, Yeung M, Battie MC. Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1646-60. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120379. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
- Morishita Y, Hida S, Naito M, Arimizu J, Takamori Y. Neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal canal stenosis: the clinical relationship between the local pressure of the intervertebral foramen and the clinical findings in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):130-4. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318167b054.
- Nee RJ, Butler D. Management of peripheral neuropathic pain: Integrating neurobiology, neurodynamics, and clinical evidence. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2006;7(1):36-49
- Porter RW, Ward D. Cauda equina dysfunction. The significance of two-level pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jan;17(1):9-15.
- Rademeyer I. Manual therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comprehensive physical therapy approach. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003 Feb;14(1):103-10, vii. doi: 10.1016/s1047-9651(02)00077-3.
- Schafer A, Hall T, Muller G, Briffa K. Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):482-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1632-2. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
- Sugioka T, Hayashino Y, Konno S, Kikuchi S, Fukuhara S. Predictive value of self-reported patient information for the identification of lumbar spinal stenosis. Fam Pract. 2008 Aug;25(4):237-44. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn031. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
- Tomkins-Lane CC, Holz SC, Yamakawa KS, Phalke VV, Quint DJ, Miner J, Haig AJ. Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):647-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.023. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 22, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
April 22, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 8, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
December 11, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 25, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A17-4019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
All collected IPD
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridHospital San Carlos, Madrid; FUNDACION PARA LA INVESTIGACION HOSPITAL CLINICO...RecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) | Lumbar Canal StenosisSpain
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
University of ValenciaHospital General Universitario de ValenciaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Neurogenic ClaudicationSpain
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNorth American Spine SocietyCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spinal InstabilityUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityWithdrawnLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Disc Disease | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandKlinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital BaselCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal StenosisSwitzerland
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar SpondylosisChina
-
Bursa City HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityTurkey
-
The First People's Hospital of LianyungangNot yet recruitingSpinal Stenosis Lumbar
-
Neurocenter of Southern SwitzerlandMaastricht University; Schulthess KlinikRecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Spinal Disease | Lumbar InstabilitySwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Physical therapy intervention
-
University of AlcalaCompletedPregnancy Related | Recti DiastasisSpain
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabNorthwestern University; University of Illinois at Chicago; Ann & Robert H Lurie... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPremature Birth | Intraventricular Hemorrhage | Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia | Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy | Motor DelayUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedShoulder Weakness Following Neck Dissection SurgeryUnited States
-
Sahmyook UniversityCompletedPain, Postoperative | Rotator Cuff Injuries | KinesiophobiaKorea, Republic of
-
Nourhan Atwa SaidCairo UniversityRecruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Egypt
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruitingChronic StrokePakistan
-
University of AlbertaAlberta Health servicesRecruitingHead and Neck Cancer | TrismusCanada
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedCerebral PalsyPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted