Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulphate for Caesarean Delivery

February 25, 2017 updated by: Ahmed talaat ahmed aly, Assiut University

Effect of Adding Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulphate to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Spinal Block and Neonatal Outcome in Uncomplicated Caesarean Delivery

Regional anesthesia has become more popular in cesarean deliveries because most of the parturients prefer being awake during the birth process. In addition, regional anesthesia may be a safer method than general. In spinal anesthesia local anesthetics alone may not be enough for an effective postoperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability of the patient wich is crucial during cesarean section. So far many adjuvants have been used to augment the analgesia produced by intrathecal local anesthetics and to reduce their adverse effects .

Various intrathecal adjuvants to local anaesthetics have found to improve the quality and extend duration of spinal block. Prolongation of duration of spinal block is desirable both for long procedures and for postoperative pain relief. Efficacy and safty of intrathecal magnesium as analgesic adjuvant has been tested by several clinical trails in recent years.Antinociceptive effect of magnesium appears to be relevant for the management of chronic and post operative pain. These effects are primarily based on regulation of calcium influx in to the cell. Magnesium blocks calcium influx and non competitively antagonizes NMDA channels. NMDA receptor signelling plays an impartent in determining the duration of acute pain3).) addition of magnesium to spinal anaesthesia improved postoperative analgesia in orthopedic setting. addition of intrathecal magnesium sulfate to 10 mg bupivacaine plus 25µg fentanyl prolonged spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective 2-adrenergic agonist which has been used as pre-medication and as an adjuvant to general anesthesia.Dexmedetomidine have several beneficial actions during perioperative period. They decrease sympathetic tone with attenuation of the neuroendocrine and haemodynamic response to anaesthesia and surgery, reduce anaesthetic and opiod requirement, cause sedation and analgesia. Dexmedetomidine was first introduced into clinical practice as a short term intravenous sedative in intensive care. Like any other adjuvant dexmedetomidine is not free from adverse effects. Use of dexmedetomidine is often associated with a decrease in heart rate and blood pressure.Dexmedetomidine was used to enhance the analgesic property of local anaesthetics like lidocaine bupivacaine and ropivacaine. In vivo and in vitro studies indicated that these local anaesthetics had significant neurotoxicity. Dexmedetomidine showed protective or growth promoting properties in tissues, including nerve cells from cortex. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine has a neuroprotective effect similar to methylprednisolone.

The mechanism by which intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists prolong the motor and sensory block of local anesthetics is not clear. It may be an additive or synergistic effect secondary to the different mechanisms of action of local anesthetic and alpha 2 adrenergic agonist. The local anesthetics act by blocking sodium channels, whereas the alpha 2 adrenergic agonist acts by binding to pre synapyic C fibre and post synaptic dorsal horn neurons. Intrathecal alpha 2 adrenergic agonist produce analgesia by depressing the realease of C fibre transmission by hyperpolarization of post synaptic dorsal horn neurons. Li et al observed that Glutamate is involved in excitatory neurotransmission nociception and plays an essential role in relaying noxious stimuli in the spinal cord. Intrathecal injection of alpha 2 adrenergic agonists produces potent antinociceptive effects by altering spinal neurotransmitter release and effectively treats acute pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
78

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Assiut, Egypt, 71111
        • Recruiting
        • Ahmed Talaat Ahmed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 45 years
  2. Undergo elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
  3. ASA physical status Ӏ-ӀӀ .
  4. Singleton pregnancy .
  5. At least 36 weaks gestation .

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with a history of cardiac , liver , or kidney diseases .
  2. Women with allergy to amide local anesthetics or medications included in the study .
  3. Women with any neurological problem .
  4. Any contraindication of regional anesthesia .
  5. Women with evidence of intrauterine growth restriction or fetal compromise .
  6. Failed or insatisfactory spinal block .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group C
Patients will receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg in 2.5 ml
Drug: Bupivacaine
Patients will receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg in 2.5 ml
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group D
Patients will receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg in 2 ml with dexmdetomidine 5 µg in 0.5 ml normal saline .
Drug: Dexmedetomidine
Patients will receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg in 2 ml with dexmdetomidine 5 µg in 0.5 ml normal saline
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group M
Patients will receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg in 2 ml with magnesium sulfate 50 mg in 0.5 ml normal saline .
Drug: Magnesium Sulfate
Patients will receive intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg in 2 ml magnesium sulfate 50 mg in 0.5 ml normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 6 hours
analgesia will be given if VAS is 4 or more
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
heart rate
Time Frame: 6 hours
effect of study drugs on the maternal heart rate
6 hours
blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 hours
effect of study drugs on the maternal mean blood pressure
6 hours

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
APGAR Score
Time Frame: 5 minutes
effect of study drugs on the APGAR fetal outcome
5 minutes
plasma concentration of stress hormones
Time Frame: 3 hours
effect of study drugs on the stress hormones levels
3 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Zain E. Hassan, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Assuit university (Other Identifier: Assuit university)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings