The Effects of Kinesio Tape Application With Different Verbal Input Given to With Patients With Rotator Cuff Tear
Istanbul University, Faculty of Health Science, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients were included in the study if they had a partial rotator cuff tear diagnosed on clinical grounds
- No episodes of shoulder instability
- No radiographic signs of fracture of the glenoid or the greater or lesser tuberosity MRI evidence of cuff tear
- Duration of symptoms of at least 3 months,
- Inadequate response to nonoperative management (including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, rest, and 1 local corticosteroid injection) Positive empty can test indicating possible supraspinatus involvement
- Positive Hawkins-Kennedy test indicating possible external impingement, -Subjective complaint of difficulty performing activities of daily living
- 20 to 50 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients were excluded from the study if they had inflammatory joint disease -Rheumatologic disease Osteoarthritis of humerus head
- Prior surgery on the affected shoulder
- Inability to complete questionnaires because of language problem or cognitive disorder
- Shoulder girdle fracture
- Glenohumeral dislocation/subluxation
- Acromioclavicular sprain
- Concomitant cervical spine symptoms
- A history of shoulder surgery
- Patients who did not accept to participate
- Patients who did not come to the second evaluation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1
it has been limited evidence of KT is effective
|
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application.
The physical therapist said that it has been limited evidence of KT is effective during application.
|
|
Experimental: Group 2
it has been not known that KT is effective or not
|
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application.
The physical therapist said that it has been not known that KT is effective or not during application.
|
|
Experimental: Group 3
it has been known that KT has excellent result
|
The treatment group received a standardized therapeutic KT application.
The physical therapist said that it has been known that KT has excellent result during application.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: The rest, night and pain in activity were assessed by VAS before and after 30 min, before and after 24 hours of KT application
|
Pain intensity was assessed using the VAS; each patient was asked the pain during the rest, activity, and at night (on a 0 -10 numerical pain rating scale with zero corresponding to no pain and 10 corresponding to terrible pain).
The rest, night and pain in activity were assessed by VAS before, after 30 min and 24 hours after KT application
|
The rest, night and pain in activity were assessed by VAS before and after 30 min, before and after 24 hours of KT application
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shoulder range of motion
Time Frame: ROM (range of motion) assessed by goniometer before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
Shoulder ROM measurements of forward flexion, abduction, and scapular plane external -internal rotation were taken using a standard goniometer.
Pain-free active ROM and passive ROM were assesment.
|
ROM (range of motion) assessed by goniometer before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire
Time Frame: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was evaluated before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire is a 30-item scale of disability symptoms used to assess a patient's health status.
The scores obtained from all items are then used to calculate a score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was evaluated before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was evaluated before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
|
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score (ASES)
Time Frame: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score was evaluated before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
The ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score) consists of 2 sections: a patient self-evaluation component and an assessment performed by a physician.
The patient self-evaluation section has 11 items that can be used to generate a score.
These items are divided into 2 areas: pain (1 item) and function (0 items).
The function questions ask patients whether they can perform 10 daily life activities.
Additionally, they are asked whether they can do their usual work and take part in normal sporting activity.
Scores on the ASES range from 0 (absence of function) to 100 (normal function).
The four-point Likert scale for the function questions ranges from 0 (unable to do) to 3 (not hard).
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score was evaluated before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score was evaluated before and 24 hours of KT application.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IU
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.