Safety and Efficacy of Low-volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution

August 13, 2017 updated by: Min Seob Kwak, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Safety and Efficacy of Low-volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution vs 4L PEG Dolution

The investigators will investigate the safety and efficacy of low-volume preparation (Oral Sulfate solution) compared to 4L PEG solution in bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

One aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of low-volume preparation (Oral Sulfate solution) on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Traditionally, polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution, which requires ingestion of a large volume of liquid, has been used and now to a low-volume preparations because of its clear advantages in tolerability. The tolerability of bowel preparations is related to their volume, taste, and side effects, with this being a particular problem in the elderly. Meanwhile, a new oral sulfate solution (OSS, SUPREP, Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, Mass) formulation as an effective low-volume bowel cleansing agent, with a split-dose regimen was recently developed in 2009.

Concerned about being able to better complete ingestion of bowel cleansing agent, OSS with lower volume and improved taste features, as long as it does not sacrifice safety, shuld be a better choice than PEG. Many studies have already looked at the efficacy and safety of OSS compared to PEG in average risk population, but there are no data available in solely at the elderly population. In this context, we hypothesized that OSS could be a good alternative to a standard 4L-PEG solution in elderly patients.

In this report, we describe a multicenter, prospective, investigator-blind, randomized, controlled trial investigating OSS with 4L PEG for efficacy and safety in the elderly.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
193

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05278
        • Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 75 years (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All participants from 65 to 75 age

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Underwent Colorectal surgery
  2. CHF, Acute MI <6 months
  3. ASA class III =<
  4. LC, CRF, Ascite, IBD, or Severe inflammatory state
  5. Severe constipation (Bowel movement 3/wk > or Taking stool softener)
  6. Disabled person physically or mentally
  7. Refuse consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: OSS(Suprep)
Oral Sulfate solution (Suprep) in day before and split-dose regimens In the OSS arm: between 17:00 and 18:00 hours on the day before colonoscopy, subjects were instructed to pour one 180-ml bottle of the study medication into a provided 480-ml mixing cup and fill it with water and then drink the entire volume, followed by two additional 480 ml of water. At approximately 6:00 a.m. on the following morning, the subjects took the second dose of OSS by same formulation protocol.
Other: low-volume preparation, oral sulfate solution
Oral Sulfate solution (Suprep) in day before and split-dose regimens In the OSS arm: between 17:00 and 18:00 hours on the day before colonoscopy, subjects were instructed to pour one 180-ml bottle of the study medication into a provided 480-ml mixing cup and fill it with water and then drink the entire volume, followed by two additional 480 ml of water. At approximately 6:00 a.m. on the following morning, the subjects took the second dose of OSS by same formulation protocol.
Other Names:
  • Suprep
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 4L PEG solution(Colyte)
4L PEG solution in day before and split-dose regimens In the 4L PEG arm: subjects had the first 2L between 18:00 and 19:00 hours (250mL every 15 minutes) in the evening before the colonoscopy. And the second 2L was given between 07:00 and 08:00 on the day of colonoscopy.
Other: large-volume preparation, 4L polyethylene glycol
4L PEG solution in day before and split-dose regimens In the 4L PEG arm: subjects had the first 2L between 18:00 and 19:00 hours (250mL every 15 minutes) in the evening before the colonoscopy. And the second 2L was given between 07:00 and 08:00 on the day of colonoscopy.
Other Names:
  • Colyte

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy in bowel preparation
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
The boston bowel preparation scale The BBPS uses a 10-point (0-9) summation scale assessing bowel preparation quality, by a 3 point scoring system of 0 to 3 in 3 segments of the colon (right colon, transverse colon, and left colon), where 0 = ''unprepared colon with mucosa not seen because of solid stool,'' 1 = ''portion of colonic mucosa of the segment seen, but other areas not well seen due to staining, residual stool, and/or opaque liquid,'' 2 = ''minor amount of residual staining, stool, and/or opaque liquid, but colonic mucosa of the segment seen well,'' and 3 = ''entire colonic mucosa seen well with no residual staining, stool or opaque liquid.'' An adequate bowel preparation was defined by a total BBPS score ≥ 6 with all segment scores ≥ 2, and excellent cleansing was considered as a score of > 7.
Up to 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 2 months

Proportion of adverse events. Adverse events recorded on the questionnaires included nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, sleep disturbance, numbness, weakness/faint feeling, fecal incontinence, and thirsty.

Blood samples were taken at the screening visit and the day of the procedure and were analysed for serum electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphate and magnesium), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Incident kidney injury was defined as a 25% increase in serum creatinine levels or longitudinal significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Up to 2 months
compliance and acceptability
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
proportion of patients willingness
Up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Min Seob Kwak, MD,PhD, Kyunghee University Hospital at Gangdong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 13, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016-03-021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Will not share datas

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Preparation

Clinical Trials on low-volume preparation, oral sulfate solution

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings