Comparing Sennosid A+B and Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation

August 28, 2024 updated by: İbrahim Durak, Hitit University

Sennosid A+B Versus Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation; A Prospective Randomized Observer-Blinded Study

Colonoscopy Preparation: Comparing Sennoside A+B and PM/Ca

Colonoscopy is a test used to examine the inside of the bowel. Proper bowel preparation is crucial because it helps doctors get a clear view during the procedure.

What is Sennoside A+B? Sennoside A+B is a type of laxative made from the senna plant. It works by stimulating the bowel to move and reducing the absorption of water, making it easier to pass stools. Research has shown that high doses of sennoside A+B can be effective for bowel preparation.

Sennoside A+B vs. PEG:

Some studies have found that sennoside A+B is more effective than PEG, another laxative, but can cause more abdominal pain. Other studies have found no significant difference in effectiveness between the two.

What is Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid (PM/Ca)? PM/Ca is a combination of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid. Sodium picosulfate stimulates bowel movements, while magnesium oxide and citric acid help increase water in the bowel, making it easier to pass stools.

PM/Ca vs. PEG:

Research has shown that PM/Ca is as effective as PEG for bowel preparation. Patients using PM/Ca generally tolerate the preparation process better than those using PEG.

Conclusion:

While PEG is the preferred option according to guidelines, its high cost can make it less accessible in some places. In this study, we aim to compare the effectiveness and patient tolerance of Sennoside A+B and PM/Ca since no direct comparison between these two preparations has been made before.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Colonoscopy is an endoscopic imaging method used to examine the lumen and mucosa of the bowel. It is the gold standard method used for colorectal cancer screening and the detection of most colorectal pathologies. Successful bowel preparation is one of the key factors for a successful colonoscopic examination.

Sennoside A+B is a stimulant laxative derived from the senna plant (Cassia senna). Studies have shown that after senna is ingested, it is activated by the gut flora, directly interacts with the intestinal mucosa, stimulates bowel movements, and inhibits the absorption of electrolytes and water. High doses of senna have been shown to be beneficial as a bowel preparation agent.

There are many studies in the literature comparing senna compounds with polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. In a randomized controlled study conducted by Coskun et al. on 474 patients, it was found that bowel cleansing was better with sennoside A+B compared to PEG, but abdominal pain was more common in the senna group. Another randomized controlled study conducted by Shavakhi et al. on 322 patients found no difference in effectiveness between the two agents.

Drugs containing sodium picosulfate-magnesium oxide-citric acid (PM/Ca) are laxative agents recommended for colonoscopy preparation in ESGE and ASGE guidelines. While sodium picosulfate acts as a stimulant laxative, magnesium oxide and citric acid act as osmotic laxatives.

In the SEE CLEAR II randomized controlled trial comparing PM/Ca with PEG, PM/Ca was found to be as effective as PEG. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of side effects, but participants using PM/Ca tolerated the bowel preparation procedure much better.

The ASGE and ESGE guidelines primarily recommend PEG solutions for colon preparation. However, due to the lack of reimbursement by the Social Security Institution (SGK) in our country and the resulting cost, access to PEG treatment is difficult for patients. For these reasons, other treatments recommended in the available guidelines are used more frequently in our country.

Although there are many studies in the literature comparing PM/Ca and sennoside A+B preparations with PEG and other preparations in terms of efficacy for bowel preparation, no study has directly compared PM/Ca with sennoside A+B to date. We aimed to compare the efficacy and patient tolerance of these two commonly used preparations in our country.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: İbrahim Durak
  • Phone Number: +903642193000

Study Locations

      • Çorum, Turkey, 19030
        • Hitit University Erol Olcok Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:
          • İbrahim Durak

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-80 years scheduled for elective outpatient colonoscopy.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of intra-abdominal surgery.
  • Chronic kidney failure.
  • Congestive heart failure.
  • Chronic liver failure.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Electrolyte imbalance.
  • Hospitalized patients.
  • Patients unable to use the bowel preparation treatment
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to Sennoside A+B or PM/Ca components
  • Known gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: "Sennoside A+B Group" for bowel preparation.

This study will compare two bowel preparation methods in patients undergoing colonoscopy:

Sennoside A+B Group

Intervention: Patients will take Sennoside A+B, a stimulant laxative derived from the senna plant.

Purpose: To cleanse the colon by increasing bowel movements and reducing water absorption.

Bowel Preparation
Active Comparator: "PM/Ca Group" for bowel preparation.

PM/Ca Group (Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid)

Intervention: Patients will take a combination of sodium picosulfate (a stimulant laxative) and magnesium oxide/citric acid (osmotic agents).

Purpose: To promote bowel movements by stimulating the bowel and drawing water into the colon.

Bowel Preparation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sennosid A+B versus Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Observer-Blinded Study
Time Frame: 4 months

Effectiveness of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

The BBPS is a standardized 9-point assessment scale for the colon. The structure of the colon is divided into its three segments: right colon, transverse colon, and left colon. Each segment is classified from 0 to 3 depending on the degree of soiling. The sum total of the three segments represents the degree of soiling, so that a total ≤ 5 points shows poor bowel preparation, while 6-7 shows good bowel preparation, and ≥ 8 very good bowel preparation. The investigators will consider patients with a score of 6 or higher as successful.

4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: İbrahim Durak, Hitit University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 22, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 22, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Preparation

Clinical Trials on Sennosid A+B

Subscribe