- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06551883
Comparison of Split-dose and Single-dose Bowel Preparation Regimens Using Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte(PEG) (PEG)
Comparison of Comfort and Tolerability Between Split-dose and Single-dose Bowel Preparation Regimens Using Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte: A Quasi-experimental Study
The goal of this quasi-experimental study was to compare the effect of single-dose and split-dose 3L compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG) regimen on the quality, comfort and tolerability of bowel preparation in patients who would undergo colonoscopy examination or treatment.
Participants in group A received a split-dose 3L PEG regimen, with 1L PEG taken on the night before the colonoscopy and 2L PEG taken 4-6 hours before the procedure. Participants in group B received a single-dose 3L PEG taken 4-6 hours before the colonoscopy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Related guidelines recommend a split-dose method for bowel preparation. However, this regimen also has limitations, such as affect patients' sleep and that of other patients in the ward, and exacerbate their discomfort due to increased hunger. This quasi-experimental study aims to investigate the effect of single-dose and split-dose 3L compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG) regimen on the quality, comfort and tolerability of bowel preparation.
A total of 101 patients scheduled for colonoscopy in two gastroenterology wards in a Chinese university hospital from January to June 2021 were enrolled in the study.
Patients in one department (group A) were given the 3L PEG in two doses: 1L of PEG was taken from 8:00 pm to 9:00 pm on the night before the examination, and the remaining 2L of PEG were taken from 4:00 am to 6:00 am on the day of the examination, with 250 mL taken every 15 minutes until finished. Patients in the other department (group B) were given 3L of PEG in a single dose, which was taken gradually from around 3-4 am, 4-6 hours before the examination. Patients in group B were also instructed to take 250 mL every 15 minutes until the 3L were finished.
The bowel preparation quality, comfort, sleep quality, adverse reactions, acceptance, and compliance were evaluated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
- Wang Xia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- inpatients aged 18 to 70 years, with informed consent and willingness to cooperate
Exclusion Criteria:
- intestinal obstruction and stenosis;
- a history of PEG allergy;
- constipation or taking laxatives
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Group A
Patients in group A were given the 3L PEG in two doses: 1L of PEG was taken from 8:00 pm to 9:00 pm on the night before the examination, and the remaining 2L of PEG were taken from 4:00 am to 6:00 am on the day of the examination, with 250 mL taken every 15 minutes until finished.
|
Patients in Group A receive the 3L of PEG in a split dose
|
|
Experimental: Group B
Patients in group B were given 3L of PEG in a single dose, which was taken gradually from around 3-4 am, 4-6 hours before the examination.
Patients in group B were also instructed to take 250 mL every 15 minutes until the 3L were finished.
|
Patients in Group B receive the 3L of PEG in a single dose
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bowel preparation quality
Time Frame: The BBPS scores were filled out by the treating physician in the designated area on the patient's examination request form and were collected and organized by the research team immediately after the end of the day's clinic
|
Bowel preparation quality was evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS)
|
The BBPS scores were filled out by the treating physician in the designated area on the patient's examination request form and were collected and organized by the research team immediately after the end of the day's clinic
|
|
comfort
Time Frame: Patients self-evaluated their comfort level during the bowel preparation process after it was completed
|
a self-designed comfort evaluation scale was used, with a linear visual analog rating scale ranging from 0 (comfortable) to 4 (extremely uncomfortable).
|
Patients self-evaluated their comfort level during the bowel preparation process after it was completed
|
|
tolerability
Time Frame: Patients finished the tolerability evaluation by themselves after completing bowel preparation and before being sent to the endoscopy center
|
①Patients self-assessed whether they were willing to undergo the same bowel preparation method again after the end of bowel preparation; ②Patients self-evaluated the difficulty of completing the bowel cleansing process after bowel preparation, with a score of very difficult (1 point), difficult (2 points), moderate (3 points), easy (4 points), and very easy (5 points)
|
Patients finished the tolerability evaluation by themselves after completing bowel preparation and before being sent to the endoscopy center
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
sleep quality
Time Frame: Patients finished the sleep quality evaluation by themselves after completing bowel preparation and before being sent to the endoscopy center
|
Patients self-evaluated the quality of sleep on the night before bowel preparation, which is compared with usual and may be the same or slightly worse.
|
Patients finished the sleep quality evaluation by themselves after completing bowel preparation and before being sent to the endoscopy center
|
|
adherence
Time Frame: Patients finished the adherence evaluation by themselves after completing bowel preparation and before being sent to the endoscopy center
|
Patients' compliance with medication was evaluated based on three indicators: whether the patient started taking the medication at the correct time, whether the medication was taken completely according to the instructions, and whether the patient engaged in active exercise after taking the medication
|
Patients finished the adherence evaluation by themselves after completing bowel preparation and before being sent to the endoscopy center
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Ashley
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bowel Preparation
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenNorgine BVActive, not recruitingHealthy | Bowel Preparation | Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy | Bowel Cleansing for ColonoscopyBelgium
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedEfficacy of Bowel Preparation | Ease of Bowel Preparation and Patient TolerabilityCanada
-
Alexandra Hospital, Athens, GreeceRecruitingBowel Preparation | Preparation for ColonoscopyGreece
-
Inje UniversityUnknownBOWEL PREPARATION (BOWEL CLEANSING)Korea, Republic of
-
Joseph SpataroHappy Colon FoodsCompletedAssessment of Safety, Quality, and Acceptance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With LaxativesBowel Preparation for Colonoscopy | Colon Cancer Screening | Bowel Preparation, Efficacy, Tolerability, SafetyUnited States
-
Hitit UniversityNot yet recruitingBowel PreparationTurkey
-
Ferring PharmaceuticalsRecruitingBowel PreparationUnited States
-
Fu Jen Catholic University HospitalCompleted
-
Jinling Hospital, ChinaCompleted
-
Taejoon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Completed
Clinical Trials on traditional bowel preparation regime
-
University of Child Health Sciences and Children...RecruitingBowel Preparation | Colostomy - Stoma | BOWEL ANASTOMOSISPakistan
-
Muhammad AslamRecruiting
-
University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City (UMC)Recruiting
-
Braintree LaboratoriesCompletedBowel Preparation for ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationMcMaster UniversityUnknownAnastomotic Leak | Surgical Site InfectionCanada
-
Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical UniversityHoly Family Hospital, PakistanCompletedColorectal Surgery | Bowel Preparation | PediatricPakistan
-
Ningbo No. 1 HospitalCompletedBowel Preparation | Post-polypectomy Bleeding | Urgent ColonoscopyChina
-
Casen Recordati S.L.CompletedBowel Preparation for ColonoscopySpain
-
Harminder SinghCompletedColonoscopy | Patient ComplianceCanada
-
Sunil PatelCompletedColonoscopy | Mass Screening | Colorectal Cancer ScreeningCanada