Avoiding Bacterial Contamination of Clean Catch Urine Cultures in Ambulatory Patients in the Emergency Department

April 16, 2020 updated by: Mary Lough, Stanford University
The purpose of this study is to find the best cleaning and collection methods to obtain a 'non-contaminated' clean catch mid-stream urine sample to diagnose suspected urinary tract infection (UTI).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a major public health issue resulting in more than 3-million visits to Emergency Departments in the United States each year. As part of the diagnostic work up, a sterile urine sample is requested for culture. The preferred urine specimen is a "Clean Catch Midstream Urine Sample". When patients are ambulatory and competent, this is a self-obtained specimen in a private bathroom. If the urine is not collected in a sterile manner the urine sample may be 'contaminated' by bacteria that originate from the skin or genital area, and not from the urinary tract. This is often described by the clinical laboratory as 'mixed growth bacteria'. A contaminated sample may lead to a false-positive urine culture result. In a non-contaminated urine specimen, only a single bacterial growth is identified as the source of the infection. Mixed bacterial flora with two or more microorganisms makes interpretation of the urine culture more difficult and prone to error. The American College of Pathologists has published results of national laboratory surveys on Urine Culture Contamination in 1998 and 2008 that document the scope of the problem.

SAMPLE: Adult ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a suspected UTI and have a urine culture ordered by a physician. A total of 2000 patients will be enrolled (500 per group). This is estimated to result in 600 urine samples (150 per group). Written consent is not normally required for a self-obtained urine sample. The study will be explained and participants will verbally consent or decline to participate, as approved by the Institutional Review Board.

SETTING: Emergency Department of an academic medical center.

METHOD: This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 4 groups that compare different patient self-cleaning and self-collection methods. All study supplies materials are commercially available in the United States. Each participant will be provided with study-specific visual aids for male or female participants and their randomly assigned group. The four groups are:

Group 1: Standard moist wipes and standard collection container. Group 2: Silver impregnated moist wipes and standard collection container. Group 3: Standard moist wipes and funnel collection container. Group 4: Silver impregnated moist wipes and funnel collection container. The urine samples will be sent to the Hospital Microbiology Laboratory for analysis. Urine samples with a positive leuk-esterase pre-screen will be sent for urine culture.

DATA ANALYSIS:This study is powered to detect a large effect size change in any study groups (2. 3. 4) compared with control (group 1). The sample size is sufficient to identify the method(s) with the lowest urine sample contamination rate.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1471

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department at an Academic Medical Center with a physician order for a urine culture. Patient must be able to self-obtain the urine culture.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of older
  • Urine culture order by physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Urinary catheter in place
  • Not ambulatory

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
A: Container + Castile-soap wipe
Sterile urine collection container and Castile-soap wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen - Control group represents usual care in the Emergency Department.
Other: Container
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other Names:
  • Standard container for urine collection
Other: Castile-soap wipe
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
B: Container + Silver impregnated wipe
Sterile urine collection container and silver-impregnated cloth-wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen
Other: Container
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other Names:
  • Standard container for urine collection
Other: Silver Impregnated Wipe
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other Names:
  • Theraworx
C: Funnel + Castile-soap wipe
Sterile urine collection funnel and Castile-soap wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen
Other: Castile-soap wipe
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other: Funnel
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other Names:
  • Peezy Mid-stream urine collection kit
D: Funnel + Silver-impregnated wipe
Urine collection funnel and sliver impregnated cloth-wipe given to patient to self-obtain a clean catch mid-stream urine specimen
Other: Silver Impregnated Wipe
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other Names:
  • Theraworx
Other: Funnel
Ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department who have a urine culture ordered by the physician receive one of four urine collection/hygiene options.
Other Names:
  • Peezy Mid-stream urine collection kit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in the number of contaminated urine cultures
Time Frame: 9 months
Contamination >10,000 CFU/mL mixed flora identified by Clinical Laboratory
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
EBLEN Charities
Forte Medical Ltd.
Avadim Technologies, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mary E. Lough, PhD, RN, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 33879

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bacteriuria

Clinical Trials on Container

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings