Finding the Optimal Voluntary Exercise Parameters for Those Living With Quadriplegia

May 8, 2017 updated by: Barbara Shay, University of Manitoba

Finding the Optimal Voluntary Exercise Parameters for Generating a Health Benefit in Those Living With Quadriplegia

There are over 44,000 persons living with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Canada, who face substantial challenges in maintaining a healthy body composition after injury. As a result, obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are prevalent in this population. Guidelines indicating that twice weekly 20-minute sessions of exercise (plus resistance training) will increase physical fitness in those with SCI have been recently published. However, no SCI-specific guidelines indicating the volume of exercise to reduce the risk of developing obesity-related diseases exist. Longitudinal studies indicate that a weekly exercise-related energy expenditure of 2000 - 2500 Calories is correlated with the least likelihood of cardiovascular disease in the able-bodied population. There is little information regarding energy expenditure (EE) for activities carried out by persons with SCI, with less available for persons with tetraplegia. Once known, this EE data can be used to develop exercise interventions to determine the volume of voluntary exercise required to reduce obesity and risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease in those living with tetraplegia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the absence of successful regeneration treatments to recover normal neurological function after spinal cord injury, there has been a needed focus on research aimed at preventing or minimizing the secondary complications of living with a spinal cord injury (SCI). Approximately 44,000 persons live with traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada, half of which have tetraplegia, with 35 new spinal cord injuries (SCI) per million each year. Persons with spinal cord injury SCI are among the most sedentary on the planet, with a much higher incidence of related diseases, such as obesity, glucose intolerance, diabetes and cardiovascular disease than the able-bodied population. At the same time, information needed to minimize the risk of developing these diseases for those living with spinal cord injury is lacking. For example, specific information regarding resting energy requirements, energy expenditure during exercise, and the volume of exercise required to maintain a healthy body composition and prevent the development of sedentary-related disease in this population is scarce.

In order to maintain weight, and not gain excess body fat, energy intake in food Calories needs to match energy use. In addition to understanding energy use in order to maintain weight balance, exercise is also important for muscular and cardiovascular health. Research to date indicates that the resting energy expenditure of persons with SCI is considerably less than able-bodied persons with the same weight or body mass index. A considerable portion of this reduced resting energy expense is due to the reduced muscle mass after SCI. There are mixed research results regarding whether there are additional reductions in resting energy expenditure, after adjusting for fat free mass, in persons with SCI. Training has been shown to be effective in reducing shoulder pain, improving function, improving physical capacity, reducing hyperinsulinemia, and reducing dyslipidemia in persons with chronic paraplegia.

However, it is less clear if voluntary exercise can have the same beneficial effects for those living with tetraplegia, in part because their peak power output is only one-third to one-half that achieved during arm exercise in those with paraplegia. In addition, it may be very difficult for those with tetraplegia to be able to exercise for a sufficient duration to achieve a sufficient training effect to either maintain a healthy body composition or reduce the risk of developing the sedentary diseases common to this population. This study will provide the exercise-related energy expenditure data to address this question.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0T6
        • University of Manitoba

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will consist of 7 persons living with tetraplegia in addition to 7 persons living with paraplegia to act as controls for study 1. Participants will have sustained a motor-complete spinal cord injury at least 6 months previous. Able-bodied participants are matched for age, height and weight.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • motor complete spinal cord injury
  • tetraplegia or paraplegia
  • stabile condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • serious overuse injuries of the upper extremities
  • known cardiovascular disease
  • current pressure ulcers
  • morbid obesity
  • known thyroid dysfunction
  • cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
tetraplegia, paraplegia
motor complete spinal cord injured individuals with tetraplegia or paraplegia
Other: exercise
energy expenditure will be measured for each of the participants during different conditions, rest, during exercise with the arm crank height high or low. Energy expenditure will also be measured during exercise using different modes (arm ergometer, wheelchair and arm-bike). Results will be compared between rest and exercise and between individuals with SCI and able-bodied.
able-bodied
age height and weight matched able bodied
Other: exercise
energy expenditure will be measured for each of the participants during different conditions, rest, during exercise with the arm crank height high or low. Energy expenditure will also be measured during exercise using different modes (arm ergometer, wheelchair and arm-bike). Results will be compared between rest and exercise and between individuals with SCI and able-bodied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in energy expenditure
Time Frame: At baseline, and every minute for three minutes of steady state exercise

Study 1 will test if optimizing the height of the arm crank axis during arm cycle ergometry will show a greater mechanical efficiency for those with tetraplegia and lead to a longer duration of sustained rhythmic exercise.

Study 2 will determine the energy expenditure while performing different modes and intensities of voluntary exercise in those with tetraplegia (wheeling, arm cycle ergometry and hand-cycling).

Study 3: Will determine if periods of reduced core temperature are present and contribute to the reduced basal and resting energy expenditure in those living with tetraplegia.
At baseline, and every minute for three minutes of steady state exercise

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Manitoba

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Barbara L Shay, PhD, University of Manitoba

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H2011:323
  • 313540 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CPA-MB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on exercise

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings